Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 09:46 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 09:46

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q46  V48
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 771
Own Kudos [?]: 4719 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
 Q49  V35
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 241
Own Kudos [?]: 372 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
plus, a fact that... gmat dislikes that particular phrase
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 1150
Own Kudos [?]: 1737 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Beyond700 wrote:
The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which caused unemployment among the workers.

(A) which caused unemployment among the workers.
(B) which caused the workers to be unemployed.
(C) a circumstance that resulted in unemployment.
(D) a fact that created unemployed workers.
(E) which led many workers to be unemployed.



ABE all wrong b/c improper use of which.

D: a fact that, this is a no no on the gmat most of the time. Also a circumstance better describes what actually happened. The coal strike is a fact, but its better described as a circumstance.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 219
Own Kudos [?]: 565 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Indonesia
 Q50  V31
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Clear C

Agree with Gmatblackbelt on D, while rest are wrong for using incorrect modifiers.

Amar
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 90
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Beyond700 wrote:
The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which caused unemployment among the workers.

(A) which caused unemployment among the workers.
(B) which caused the workers to be unemployed.
(C) a circumstance that resulted in unemployment.
(D) a fact that created unemployed workers.
(E) which led many workers to be unemployed.


For some reason I thought "Which" over here was referring to the previous clause.

totally missed this one!!
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Raffie wrote:
It has to be (C)

A, B and E suggest that the energy reserves caused the unemployment, not the strike.

D suggests that the strike created the workers.


On target. OA is C
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 90
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Beyond700 wrote:
Raffie wrote:
It has to be (C)

A, B and E suggest that the energy reserves caused the unemployment, not the strike.

D suggests that the strike created the workers.


On target. OA is C


Lately I have been confusing myself more and more with the usage of "Which" - I guess I have been too many sources.

1. Which can be used as a relative pronoun referring back to the closest noun and always preceded by a comma - I agree with this one its easy.

2. But sometimes which behaves like an absolute phrase and refers back to the previous sentence as a whole.

Why cant the usage of which above be the latter of the two??

Is the which in the options above a restrictive or non-restrictive clause


can someone please please help me out here.....
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
spider wrote:
Beyond700 wrote:
Raffie wrote:
It has to be (C)

A, B and E suggest that the energy reserves caused the unemployment, not the strike.

D suggests that the strike created the workers.


On target. OA is C


Lately I have been confusing myself more and more with the usage of "Which" - I guess I have been too many sources.

1. Which can be used as a relative pronoun referring back to the closest noun and always preceded by a comma - I agree with this one its easy.

2. But sometimes which behaves like an absolute phrase and refers back to the previous sentence as a whole.

Why cant the usage of which above be the latter of the two??

Is the which in the options above a restrictive or non-restrictive clause


can someone please please help me out here.....


This is how I see it...

In the above sentence:
The coal strike reduced Indian's energy reserves, which...

The coal strike - Subject
reduced - verb
Indiana's energy reserves - object

which - modifier . Modifies the object with this clause 'caused unemployment among the workers'
Here which rightly points to a noun but the whole sentence is illogical.

Absolute phrases are made of nouns or pronouns followed by a participle and any modifiers of the noun or pronoun. Absolute phrases contain a subject (unlike participial phrases), and no predicate. They serve to modify an entire sentence.

Where as the relative pronoun which refers to inanimate things and to animals: in their noun or pronoun form

As the first clause can stand by itself and also, as there is a comma , before which - non-restrictive clause[/b]
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 718
Own Kudos [?]: 3077 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
If I modify the sentencse (d) like below
d)a fact that resulted in unemployment

Which one you will chose? c or d please explain your answers.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 335
Own Kudos [?]: 1250 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools:University of Chicago, Wharton School
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Beyond700 wrote:
The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which caused unemployment among the workers.

(A) which caused unemployment among the workers.
(B) which caused the workers to be unemployed.
(C) a circumstance that resulted in unemployment.
(D) a fact that created unemployed workers.
(E) which led many workers to be unemployed.


C. Which in A, B, and E refers to wrong noun. in D, it is wrong to say that "The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves" created unemplyoed workers.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
x2suresh wrote:
If I modify the sentencse (d) like below
d)a fact that resulted in unemployment

Which one you will chose? c or d please explain your answers.


Both (C) and (D) will be redundant..which means you will have 2 right answer choices.

a fact that resulted in unemployment

or

a circumstance that resulted in unemployment
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 90
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Beyond700 wrote:
spider wrote:
Beyond700 wrote:
Raffie wrote:
It has to be (C)

A, B and E suggest that the energy reserves caused the unemployment, not the strike.

D suggests that the strike created the workers.


On target. OA is C


Lately I have been confusing myself more and more with the usage of "Which" - I guess I have been too many sources.

1. Which can be used as a relative pronoun referring back to the closest noun and always preceded by a comma - I agree with this one its easy.

2. But sometimes which behaves like an absolute phrase and refers back to the previous sentence as a whole.

Why cant the usage of which above be the latter of the two??

Is the which in the options above a restrictive or non-restrictive clause


can someone please please help me out here.....


This is how I see it...

In the above sentence:
The coal strike reduced Indian's energy reserves, which...

The coal strike - Subject
reduced - verb
Indiana's energy reserves - object

which - modifier . Modifies the object with this clause 'caused unemployment among the workers'
Here which rightly points to a noun but the whole sentence is illogical.

Absolute phrases are made of nouns or pronouns followed by a participle and any modifiers of the noun or pronoun. Absolute phrases contain a subject (unlike participial phrases), and no predicate. They serve to modify an entire sentence.

Where as the relative pronoun which refers to inanimate things and to animals: in their noun or pronoun form

As the first clause can stand by itself and also, as there is a comma , before which - non-restrictive clause[/b]


Beyond700 - Thank you for taking out time for the explanation.

I see in this case the which clause is modifying the noun and is a non-essential modifier.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Hi Beyond700,

I am still not clear on the usage of the relative pronoun which. Can you please explain to me with the aid of sentences the use of which-

1. To modifer an inanimate thing

2. To modifer a sentence

Don.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 206
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
don2007 wrote:
Hi Beyond700,

I am still not clear on the usage of the relative pronoun which. Can you please explain to me with the aid of sentences the use of which-

1. To modifer an inanimate thing

2. To modifer a sentence

Don.


As it is quite elaborate, I thought I would share with you some of my notes on this. Kindly have a go at it and feel free to discuss on the same.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne