GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2018, 11:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 192
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2009, 21:46
4
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:47) correct 27% (02:06) wrong based on 945 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true?

(A) All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.
(B) Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.
(C) Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.
(D) A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.
(E) Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 486
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2013, 05:40
1
5
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
Posts: 8
Re: ozone layer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2009, 22:46
(A) is out because in the argument there is no distinction about the kind of wavelenghts filtered out
(B) again. The argument does not refer to different area of the world (earth's surface)
(C) out. No distinction about animal eyes resistance.
(D) out. No mention about the number of wavelenghts to causa damages.
(E) here it is

(E) is my answer

Please post OA
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 102
Re: ozone layer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2009, 18:59
late on this one but definitely "E"
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.07
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2011, 11:46
1
3
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true?

A. All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.
B. Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.
C. Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.
D. A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.
E. Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.

Powerscore CR Bible

C is said to be wrong because "many species" may mean "all species". Please explain.

If I say I have 10 balls and many balls are red. Can't I be sure that some will not be red?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 372
Location: Texas
Re: Can "many" include "all"? (Source: PowerScore)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2011, 13:46
I will go with E for this.

Question is asking what of the following is supported by the argument.
3 is - B,C and D are talking out of the way. A is not supporting the argument.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1212
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Can "many" include "all"? (Source: PowerScore)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2011, 14:57
2
+1 E

Yes, "all" MAY include "many".
For example, if you have 100 balls, "many" could be 50 or 100 balls. In both cases, they are a lot! It is an ambiguous term. In this sense, you must be careful of what "many" could mean.

However, I think that " many " is not critical to eliminate C. "Any" is most important in that choice.

I think I deserve kudos 8-)
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.07
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Re: Can "many" include "all"? (Source: PowerScore)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2011, 22:16
metallicafan wrote:
+1 E

Yes, "all" MAY include "many".
For example, if you have 100 balls, "many" could be 50 or 100 balls. In both cases, they are a lot! It is an ambiguous term. In this sense, you must be careful of what "many" could mean.

However, I think that " many " is not critical to eliminate C. "Any" is most important in that choice.

I think I deserve kudos 8-)


Thanks a lot. I overlooked the "any" :shock:

Kudos to you! :-D
VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1055
Re: Can "many" include "all"? (Source: PowerScore)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2011, 00:20
There is a gap in reasoning of how the lights may effect the eye sight of some species.
Hence a supporter answer choice is needed here which fills the gap.

Paraphrase : how the regions where there are holes are more problematic than regions where there are no holes in Ozone layer ?
Answer to this will suffice the argument.

Between D and E,

E gives a clear answer. Also negating E will make the conclusion falls too.
Hence E is an assumption answer choice too.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 176
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2012, 22:32
A) All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.-extreme words
(B) Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.-irrelevant
(C) Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.- wrong. All animal can have their eye damaged.
(D) A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.- not mentioned in text
(E) Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.-correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 147
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2012, 02:13
Fairly simple question to be qualified for 700-Level.

My response - Choice E

Thank you for the question
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 213
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2012, 02:29
Straight E. As you may know by now, the correct answers to Inference questions are typically qualified and sometimes restrictive, and avoid making sweeping statements.

Boundary words such as "some" "likely" can be good indicators of the right answer to Inference questions. E can be adequately inferred by using the given premises without resorting to external informal.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 301
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2012, 21:01
3
1
Good question :). The argument is easy enough to understand, but the answer choices can be a little tricky.

(A) All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.

The argument says that holes can lead to severe damage. That doesn't mean that areas in which the ozone layer is intact do not cause any damage. That is, there is a difference between eye damage and severe eye damage.

(B) Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.

The argument does not talk about the extent of ozone holes.

(C) Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.

Be careful with this one--that not all species are affected by ozone holes does not mean some species are impervious to dangerous wavelengths. The 'some species' could simply be living in area which is not imperiled by ozone holes.

(D) A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.

The argument says nothing about a single wavelength.

(E) Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.

The passage discusses the effects of damaging wavelengths becoming more widespread due to holes in the ozone layer. Therefore, where there are ozone holes there is a great likelihood of eye damage.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 175
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2013, 10:10
The key thing here to note is the phrase "severe eye damage"

The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true?

A. All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.Close but flawed.No one said that other wavelengths cannot cause damage, Its just that they can't cause severe damage.So all the wavelengths need not be filtered out.
B. Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.Can't say. Maybe more live maybe not
C. Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.Is not supported by above statements
D. A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.Not supported
E. Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.
True, ozone filters some of the wavelengths, so the rays are more likely to reach the surface of earth where there are holes in the surface of earth.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 376
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2013, 06:52
ramannanda9 wrote:
The key thing here to note is the phrase "severe eye damage"

The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true?

A. All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.Close but flawed.No one said that other wavelengths cannot cause damage, Its just that they can't cause severe damage.So all the wavelengths need not be filtered out.
B. Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.Can't say. Maybe more live maybe not
C. Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.Is not supported by above statements
D. A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.Not supported
E. Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.
True, ozone filters some of the wavelengths, so the rays are more likely to reach the surface of earth where there are holes in the surface of earth.


We have this in the stem:
" However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species."

Why can't we infer from this that C is the right answer?
Clearly we are told that there will be damage to MOST species.
This means that SOME will not be hurt....
?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 175
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2013, 06:12
ronr34 wrote:
ramannanda9 wrote:
The key thing here to note is the phrase "severe eye damage"

The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true?

A. All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.Close but flawed.No one said that other wavelengths cannot cause damage, Its just that they can't cause severe damage.So all the wavelengths need not be filtered out.
B. Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.Can't say. Maybe more live maybe not
C. Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.Is not supported by above statements
D. A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.Not supported
E. Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.
True, ozone filters some of the wavelengths, so the rays are more likely to reach the surface of earth where there are holes in the surface of earth.


We have this in the stem:
" However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species."

Why can't we infer from this that C is the right answer?
Clearly we are told that there will be damage to MOST species.
This means that SOME will not be hurt....
?


Precisely because the argument says severe damage and the option C says no damage. But there can be minor damage even of there is no severe damage.

Hope it is clear.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2014
Posts: 20
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2015, 19:20
Easy, the answer is a, as here we have the favt that some wavelenght can cause damage.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Mar 2015, 09:55
Answer should be E.
This argument is one of those in which we need to take care of the words such as many, some, all etc. All the options can be rejected if we take care of these quantity words but option E.
It is mentioned in the argument that the holes cause the effect, so it can be inferred that where there is no hole effect will not be there.
_________________

Please give Kudos to the post if you liked.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2015
Posts: 7
Re: The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2016, 22:46
Answer E

A. All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.

Insufficient information. Might be true, but we are not sure.

B. Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.

Again, we dont have much information to support above. Might be true.

C. Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.

Again, we dont have much information to support above. Might be true.

D. A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.

MOST of the species, we dont know the % of species of animals whose eyes could be damaged. Moreover SINGLE is too extreme, probably there are more than one wavelength.

E. Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.

This is the right answer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jan 2017
Posts: 27
GMAT ToolKit User
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2017, 06:03
jade3 wrote:
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true?

(A) All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.
(B) Few species of animals live on a part of the earth’s surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer.
(C) Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight.
(D) A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals.
(E) Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth’s surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not.


hi there,

may someone help me on this :

why we choose E when there is not any relativity to wavelengths as the first sentence states it entirely filter some and let others pass. "The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through" so there is nothing to be likely... one wavelength is either entirely filtered or passed.

am I wrong?
GMAT Club Bot
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is &nbs [#permalink] 13 Mar 2017, 06:03

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.