It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 09:15

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1271

Kudos [?]: 2423 [2], given: 178

Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2015, 03:05
2
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (01:13) correct 34% (01:13) wrong based on 272 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects supposedly caused by a new vitamin supplement that was recently released onto the market. The new product has many advantages over its competitors such as the inclusion of antioxidants and iron, and the improvement of the absorption process of the vitamins into the body, to name a few. Clearly, the side-effects are not related to the new product and are simply coincidental.

The argument is flawed primarily because the author

A) assumes a correlation between the number of benefits provided by a particular product and its lack of drawbacks
B) does not make a clear comparison between the advantages of the new product and those of any one of its competitors
C) ignores the negative side-effects caused by the new product's competitors
D) fails to include the professional opinion of a medical expert in the field of nutritional science
E) draws a conclusion without presenting factual information that can be logically analyzed
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Kudos [?]: 2423 [2], given: 178

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2013
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 75

GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT ToolKit User
There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2015, 00:37
Harley1980 wrote:
There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects supposedly caused by a new vitamin supplement that was recently released onto the market. The new product has many advantages over its competitors such as the inclusion of antioxidants and iron, and the improvement of the absorption process of the vitamins into the body, to name a few. Clearly, the side-effects are not related to the new product and are simply coincidental.

The argument is flawed primarily because the author

A) assumes a correlation between the number of benefits provided by a particular product and its lack of drawbacks
B) does not make a clear comparison between the advantages of the new product and those of any one of its competitors
C) ignores the negative side-effects caused by the new product's competitors
D) fails to include the professional opinion of a medical expert in the field of nutritional science
E) draws a conclusion without presenting factual information that can be logically analyzed


I do not think that the answer should be A.
Conclusion: the side-effects are not related to the new product and are simply coincidental

In this case, how can we talk about correlation. The author does not state anything that existence of A also depends of existence of B
The author states that existence of side effects cannot be related to the side effects. I don't see any link here with correlation. The author does not even remotely mention mutual relationship or connection between benefits and side effects.
To me, the answer is E. The assertion that taken from the argument is based on intuition or non-factual information.
_________________

Please kindly click on "+1 Kudos", if you think my post is useful

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 75

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 246 [1], given: 39

Re: There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2015, 02:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi,

Option A nails it on the head.

If you notice, "The new product has many advantages over its competitors such as the inclusion of antioxidants and iron, and the improvement of the absorption process of the vitamins into the body, to name a few."

The argument is trying to talk about "the advantages" rather than address the issue at hand ie. "unpleasant side effects".

Basically the argument in doing so assumes that.. a product that has many advantages has less disadvantages. Hence A.

As per option E... "draws conclusion without presenting factual information" .. this is out of scope.. since "advantages" are hardly of concern to us.. we need a solution for the "side-effects".

Regards,
Dom.

Kudos [?]: 246 [1], given: 39

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 19 [1], given: 110

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V27
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.2
Reviews Badge
Re: There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2015, 12:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
I was able to eliminate B,C and D.

Not sure how A can be better than E.

Kudos [?]: 19 [1], given: 110

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1343

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1366

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2017, 08:38
what type of this question?

Kaplan says flaw questions can be a weaken, or an assumption. To me, it looks like a logic question.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1366

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1343

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1366

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2017, 08:39
alphaseeker wrote:
Harley1980 wrote:
There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects supposedly caused by a new vitamin supplement that was recently released onto the market. The new product has many advantages over its competitors such as the inclusion of antioxidants and iron, and the improvement of the absorption process of the vitamins into the body, to name a few. Clearly, the side-effects are not related to the new product and are simply coincidental.

The argument is flawed primarily because the author

A) assumes a correlation between the number of benefits provided by a particular product and its lack of drawbacks
B) does not make a clear comparison between the advantages of the new product and those of any one of its competitors
C) ignores the negative side-effects caused by the new product's competitors
D) fails to include the professional opinion of a medical expert in the field of nutritional science
E) draws a conclusion without presenting factual information that can be logically analyzed


I do not think that the answer should be A.
Conclusion: the side-effects are not related to the new product and are simply coincidental

In this case, how can we talk about correlation. The author does not state anything that existence of A also depends of existence of B
The author states that existence of side effects cannot be related to the side effects. I don't see any link here with correlation. The author does not even remotely mention mutual relationship or connection between benefits and side effects.
To me, the answer is E. The assertion that taken from the argument is based on intuition or non-factual information.



yes, the answer is A. This is an assumption question and E is out of scope. Everything is obvious.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1366

Re: There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects   [#permalink] 20 Oct 2017, 08:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

There have been many complaints about the unpleasant side-effects

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.