Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Source- Manhattan SC book Correct- Between 1998 and 2003, there was heavy fighting in Parthia AMONG numerous armed factions; this conflict, so much more complicated than a conventional war between two states, involved no FEWER than eight countries and twenty-five militia
Incorrect Between 1998 and 2003, there was heavy fighting in Parthia AMONG numerous armed factions yet this conflict, so much more complicated than a conventional war between two states, involved no FEWER than eight countries and twenty-five militia
Explanation in book: Yet should be a semicolon. Yet is illogical because the action in the second clause (this conflict ... militias) did not happen despite the action in the first clause (Between .. factions), as a word such as yet suggests.
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
One way to use a semicolon is to join two related independent clauses. When we read a semicolon, we read it as a (significant) pause, but we must infer the intended meaning ourselves, as a semicolon on its own doesn’t tell us anything about the logical relationship between the two clauses it joins.
Yet, however, does carry a meaning (~"nevertheless" here). The sentence you read is trying to say "heavy fighting among numerous parties, more complicated than between two parties". These ideas need something that allows us to continue reading this as a bunch of ideas moving in the same direction. Yet doesn’t make sense here because the last idea ("more complicated than between two parties") is meant to support the "numerous parties" idea. It’s not supposed to move in the other direction.
One way to use a semicolon is to join two related independent clauses. When we read a semicolon, we read it as a (significant) pause, but we must infer the intended meaning ourselves, as a semicolon on its own doesn’t tell us anything about the logical relationship between the two clauses it joins.
Yet, however, does carry a meaning (~"nevertheless" here). The sentence you read is trying to say "heavy fighting among numerous parties, more complicated than between two parties". These ideas need something that allows us to continue reading this as a bunch of ideas moving in the same direction. Yet doesn’t make sense here because the last idea ("more complicated than between two parties") is meant to support the "numerous parties" idea. It’s not supposed to move in the other direction.
Show more
Dear Sir,
Thanks for prompt response AjiteshArun, I have follow up question to enhance my understanding. If use of "yet" is for "nevertheless", then use of But is also same. And there is difference between "But" and "yet" in GMAT and general english. Please enlighten.
Thanks for prompt response AjiteshArun, I have follow up question to enhance my understanding. If use of "yet" is for "nevertheless", then use of But is also same. And there is difference between "But" and "yet" in GMAT and general english. Please enlighten.
But and yet can be conjunctions, in which case they are very similar in meaning (they can both be used to indicate a contrast, although yet also carries the additional emphasis of nevertheless). They can also be used in other ways (yet as an adverb, but as an adverb or as a preposition).
Did you come across a question that forced you to choose between the two? If you did, you can link to it in this thread.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.