The Japanese American sculptor Isamu Noguchi
(1904–1988) was an artist who intuitively asked—and
responded to—deeply original questions. He might
well have become a scientist within a standard
(5) scientific discipline, but he instead became an artist
who repeatedly veered off at wide angles from the
well-known courses followed by conventionally
talented artists of both the traditional and modern
schools. The story behind one particular sculpture
(10) typifies this aspect of his creativeness.
By his early twenties, Noguchi’s sculptures
showed such exquisite comprehension of human
anatomy and deft conceptual realization that he won a
Guggenheim Fellowship for travel in Europe. After
(15) arriving in Paris in 1927, Noguchi asked the
Romanian-born sculptor Constantin Brancusi if he
might become his student. When Brancusi said no,
that he never took students, Noguchi asked if he
needed a stonecutter. Brancusi did. Noguchi cut and
(20) polished stone for Brancusi in his studio, frequently
also polishing Brancusi’s brass and bronze sculptures.
Noguchi, with his scientist’s mind, pondered the fact
that sculptors through the ages had relied exclusively
upon negative light—that is, shadows—for their
(25) conceptual communication, precisely because no
metals, other than the expensive, nonoxidizing gold,
could be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections.
Noguchi wanted to create a sculpture that was
purely reflective. In 1929, after returning to the
(30) United States, he met the architect and philosopher
R. Buckminster Fuller, offering to sculpt a portrait of
him. When Fuller heard of Noguchi’s ideas regarding
positive-light sculpture, he suggested using chrome-
nickel steel, which Henry Ford, through automotive
(35) research and development, had just made
commercially available for the first time in history.
Here, finally, was a permanently reflective surface,
economically available in massive quantities.
In sculpting his portrait of Fuller, Noguchi did not
(40) think of it as merely a shiny alternate model of
traditional, negative-light sculptures. What he saw
was that completely reflective surfaces provided a
fundamental invisibility of surface like that of utterly
still waters, whose presence can be apprehended only
(45) when objects—a ship’s mast, a tree, or sky—are
reflected in them. Seaplane pilots making offshore landings
in dead calm cannot tell where the water is and must
glide in, waiting for the unpredictable touchdown.
Noguchi conceived a similarly invisible sculpture,
(50) hidden in and communicating through the reflections
of images surrounding it. Then only the distortion of
familiar shapes in the surrounding environment could
be seen by the viewer. The viewer’s awareness of the
“invisible” sculpture’s presence and dimensional
(55) relationships would be derived only secondarily.
Even after this stunning discovery, Noguchi
remained faithful to his inquisitive nature. At the
moment when his explorations had won critical
recognition of the genius of his original and
(60) fundamental conception, Noguchi proceeded to the
next phase of his evolution.
1. In saying that “no metals, other than the expensive, nonoxidizing gold, could be relied upon to give off positive-light reflections” (lines 25–27), the author draws a distinction between(A) a metal that can be made moderately reflective in any sculptural application and metals that can be made highly reflective but only in certain applications
(B) a naturally highly reflective metal that was technically suited for sculpture and other highly reflective metals that were not so suited
(C) metals that can be made highly reflective but lose their reflective properties over time and a metal that does not similarly lose its reflective properties
(D) a highly reflective sculptural material that, because it is a metal, is long lasting and nonmetallic materials that are highly reflective but impermanent
(E) a highly reflective metal that was acceptable to both traditional and modern sculptors and highly reflective metals whose use in sculpture was purely experimental
2. The passage provides information sufficient to answer which one of the following questions?(A) In what way did Noguchi first begin to acquire experience in the cutting and polishing of stone for use in sculpture?
(B) In the course of his career, did Noguchi ever work in any art form other than sculpture?
(C) What are some materials other than metal that Noguchi used in his sculptures after ending his association with Brancusi?
(D) During Noguchi’s lifetime, was there any favorable critical response to his creation of a positive-light sculpture?
(E) Did Noguchi at any time in his career consider creating a transparent or translucent sculpture lighted from within?
3. The passage offers the strongest evidence that the author would agree with which one of the following statements?(A) Noguchi’s work in Paris contributed significantly to the art of sculpture in that it embodied solutions to problems that other sculptors, including Brancusi, had sought unsuccessfully to overcome.
(B) Noguchi’s scientific approach to designing sculptures and to selecting materials for sculptures is especially remarkable in that he had no formal scientific training.
(C) Despite the fact that Brancusi was a sculptor and Fuller was not, Fuller played a more pivotal role than did Brancusi in Noguchi’s realization of the importance of negative light to the work of previous sculptors.
(D) Noguchi was more interested in addressing fundamental aesthetic questions than in maintaining a consistent artistic style.
(E) Noguchi’s work is of special interest for what it reveals not only about the value of scientific thinking in the arts but also about the value of aesthetic approaches to scientific inquiry.
4. In which one of the following is the relation between the two people most analogous to the relation between Ford and Noguchi as indicated by the passage?(A) A building-materials dealer decides to market a new type of especially durable simulatedwood flooring material after learning that a famous architect has praised the material.
(B) An expert skier begins experimenting with the use of a new type of material in the soles of ski boots after a shoe manufacturer suggests that that material might be appropriate for that use.
(C) A producer of shipping containers begins using a new type of strapping material, which a rock-climbing expert soon finds useful as an especially strong and reliable component of safety ropes for climbing.
(D) A consultant to a book editor suggests the use of a new type of software for typesetting, and after researching the software the editor decides not to adopt it but finds a better alternative as a result of the research.
(E) A friend of a landscaping expert advises the use of a certain material for the creation of retaining walls and, as a result, the landscaper explores the use of several similar materials.
5. The passage most strongly supports which one of the following inferences?(A) Prior to suggesting the sculptural use of chrome-nickel steel to Noguchi, Fuller himself had made architectural designs that called for the use of this material.
(B) Noguchi believed that the use of industrial materials to create sculptures would make the sculptures more commercially viable.
(C) Noguchi’s “invisible” sculpture appears to have no shape or dimensions of its own, but rather those of surrounding objects.
(D) If a positive-light sculpture depicting a person in a realistic manner were coated with a metal subject to oxidation, it would eventually cease to be recognizable as a realistic likeness.
(E) The perception of the shape and dimensions of a negative-light sculpture does not depend on its reflection of objects from the environment around it.
6. Which one of the following inferences about the portrait of Fuller does the passage most strongly support?(A) The material that Noguchi used in it had been tentatively investigated by other sculptors but not in direct connection with its reflective properties.
(B) It was similar to at least some of the sculptures that Noguchi produced prior to 1927 in that it represented a human form.
(C) Noguchi did not initially think of it as especially innovative or revolutionary and thus was surprised by Fuller’s reaction to it.
(D) It was produced as a personal favor to Fuller and thus was not initially intended to be noticed and commented on by art critics.
(E) It was unlike the sculptures that Noguchi had helped Brancusi to produce in that the latter’s aesthetic effects did not depend on contrasts of light and shadow.
7. Which one of the following would, if true, most weaken the author’s position in the passage?(A) Between 1927 and 1929, Brancusi experimented with the use of highly reflective material for the creation of positive-light sculptures.
(B) After completing the portrait of Fuller, Noguchi produced only a few positive-light sculptures and in fact changed his style of sculpture repeatedly throughout his career.
(C) When Noguchi arrived in Paris, he was already well aware of the international acclaim that Brancusi’s sculptures were receiving at the time.
(D) Many of Noguchi’s sculptures were, unlike the portrait of Fuller, entirely abstract.
(E) Despite his inquisitive and scientific approach to the art of sculpture, Noguchi neither thought of himself as a scientist nor had extensive scientific training.