Para 1: Usage of flash by fireflies to locate and court sexual partners. How fireflies use the flash technique.
Para 2: Common belief that fireflies show behavioral plasticity i.e flash codes do not vary. However study by author and Lloyd show otherwise
Para 3: Behavioral plasticity seen in other insects. Male cricket chirps. In some fireflies both sexes rapidly interchange info, each altering its responses on detecting specific feature of partner's signal
Main point: Plasticity is observed in fireflies/other insects via lloyd's and his examples, evidences that challenge widely held view
1. In the second and third paragraphs, the author is primarily concerned withA. reconciling two apparently conflicting views
-- there is no reconciliation of two conflicting view
B. presenting evidence that counters a common belief
-- It captures the essence as author's evidences show plasticity in fireflies and other insects as opposed to commonly held view
This is the answer
C. questioning the reliability of widely accepted evidence
-- Author does not question reliability of widely held belief rather proves that wide belief is wrong and elaborates in para2 and 3
D. showing how recent evidence bears on a long¬standing controversy
-- long standing controversy is no where mentioned ...there was a commonly help belief not a controversy
E. describing the sole exceptions to an otherwise valid generalization
-- Author does not say that it is a sole exception and hence it is out
2. It can be inferred from the passage that, within any firefly species, the two sexual partners characteristically"But Lloyd (1969) observed one species in Maryland and New Jersey in which the male. After receiving an answer, shifts from emitting single flashes at even intervals to a more complex rhythm in which closely paired flashes replace the single flashes."
"For instance, at 20' C the interval between the single searches flashes averaged 2.60 seconds whereas that between the sets of paired courtship flashes averaged 2.32 seconds. Typically, each male flash emitted at the search interval was answered by females, but females answered only after the second of the closely paired flashes emitted by males at the courtship interval."
"During search, it is typical for the flying male to emit his flash pattern while crisscrossing an area, and for a nearby stationary female of the same species to answer with flashes at the species-specific latency that enables the male to "recognize" an answer. If monition occurs, courtship begins: the male hovers in flight and orient his lantern toward the female, often dimming his flashes to locate her more precisely. Eventually he lands and proceeds on foot, periodically emitting the appropriate flash pattern and receiving answers until they meet and copulate"
A. emit closely pained flashes, but only during courtship
-- there is no mention that they emit closely pained flashes only during courtship
B. answer the photic signals emitted by the members of several species but only during search
-- Incorrect as the passage discussed on one male vs female association rather than members of several species.
C. mate after an exchange of photic information that has enabled them to meet
-- Evidenced in Para 1:"If monition occurs, courtship begins: the male hovers in flight and orient his lantern toward the female, often dimming his flashes to locate her more precisely. Eventually he lands and proceeds on foot, periodically emitting the appropriate flash pattern and receiving answers until they meet and copulate"
This is the answer
D. exchange photic information more rapidly during search than during courtship
-- there is no info on how do they exchange photic information during courtship
E. move on foot toward each other before they meet
-- female is stationary as evidenced in Para 1 ""If monition occurs, courtship begins: the male hovers in flight and orient his lantern toward the female, often dimming his flashes to locate her more precisely. Eventually he lands and proceeds on foot, periodically emitting the appropriate flash pattern and receiving answers until they meet and copulate"
3. The author suggests that the species of firefly that he studied in his investigation isA. not the only firefly species having a flash code that exhibits behavioral plasticity
-- It is true that fireflies are not the only species to exhibit flash code. other insects exhibit the same."Behavioral plasticity is also evident in the analogous signal systems of some other insects. For example, the male cricket chirps a calling song during search and a different song during courtship."
This is the answer
B. probably not the same firefly species observed by Lloyd
-- "In our own research on the same species on Long Island" is what author says in para 2. Hence this option is ruled out
C. atypical of firefly species with regard to the female's ability to shift her photic signal pattern
--
D. governed by the same flash code as any firefly species that exhibits behavioral plasticity
-- it is ruled out as flash codes are variant i.e why they show behavioral plasticity..simple changes to complex...
E. the only firefly- species that has been scientifically observed on Long Island as well as in Maryland and New Jersey
-- it is not true as the last sentence of para3 says "In some and perhaps ill firefly species, both sexes rapidly exchange information. Each altering its response on detecting a specific feature of the partners signal." So the only firefly studies on Longisland and Maryland and New Jersey is incorrect
4. The author implies that which of the following negates the view that the search-courtship flash code remains invariant?A. Each species of firefly has its own distinctive flash code.
-- It does not negate the view that search-courtship flash code remains invariant... distinctiveness does not prove invariant nature
B. A male firefly is capable of recognizing the photic signal of a female of the male's species.
-- It does not negate the view that search-courtship flash code remains invariant as male recognizes female does not mean flash codes between them could not change
C. The male firefly is capable of dimming his flashes in order to better locate the female.
-- Male is capable of dimming his flashes which means it is a new flash code and its duration could also be different. It negates the invariant nature
This is the answer
D. During courtship the male firefly shifts from hovering in flight to proceeding on the ground.
-- This does not touch upon flash code...It talks about movement from flight to proceeding on ground
E. The male's photic signal pattern changes in a regular way between search and courtship.
-- Photic signal pattern changes in regular way does not prove that flash codes remain invariant. It could be that flash codes are simple or complex but they are regular.
5. The author most probably discusses the cricket's search-courtship signal system for which of the following reasons?A. To illustrate an insect signal system that is totally unlike that of the firefly
-- Author's view to prove that the signal is invariant provind that fireflies exhibit plasticity...Not for this point
B. To complete his argument that rapid information exchange is extremely common within all insect species
-- Author's point is not prove that rapid info exchange is common..author wants to prove that fireflies exhibit plasticity
C. To provide a reference point for evaluating the degree of behavioral plasticity evident in the firefly's signal system
-- Author's point is to evaluate the widely held view of no behavioral plasticity.... This captures the essence
This is the answer
D. To make the point that a photic signal system is more effective in propagating an insect species than is an acoustical signal system
-- author's point is not to make the point that a photic signal system is more effective than accoustic. No where author compares the two
E. To contrast the communication systems of fire¬flies and crickets with regard to the makability to shift from one signal pattern to another
-- Author's point is not to contrast communication system with regard to makability to shift from one pattern to another
6. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following conclusions can properly be drawn solely from the observations reported by Lloyd in 1969?"But Lloyd (1969) observed one species in Maryland and New Jersey in which the male. After receiving an answer, shifts from emitting single flashes at even intervals to a more complex rhythm in which closely paired flashes replace the single flashes."
Author's view: "In our own research on the same species on Long Island, we also observed that search and courtship' differ in this way, but differ as well in the duration of the male's flash interval,
providing further evidence for behavioral plasticity."
A. The firefly populations of Maryland and New Jersey exhibit less behavioral plasticity than does the firefly population of Long Island.
-- Lloyd does not compare plasticity in firefly poulations across locations
B. The firefly's flash code exhibits greater behavioral plasticity than does the cricket's acoustical code.
-- Lloys does not compare with cricket's acoustical code...out of scope
C. In at least one firefly species, the male firefly's flash intervals are more rhythmic during search than during courtship.
-- Lloyd does not observe rhythmic interval during courtship and hence ruled out
D. In a species of firefly, the male's flash pattern exhibits at least one feature of a behaviorally plastic flash code.
-- It captures the essence as "After receiving an answer, shifts from emitting single flashes at even intervals to a more complex rhythm in which closely paired flashes replace the single flashes" that male's flash pattern exhibits at least one feature of behaviorally plasticity. ALso author says even the duration further prove evidence of plasticity.
This is the answer
E. In the firefly species observed by Lloyd, the female's flash pattern exhibits exactly one species-specific-feature.
-- It is not mentioned by Lloyd and hence out of scope
7. Which of the following best expresses the author's main point?Main point: Plasticity is observed in fireflies/other insects via lloyd's and his examples, evidences that challenge widely held view
A. The conclusion that the search-courtship flash codes of all firefly species lack behavioral plasticity can be doubted but not rejected on the basis oldie available evidence.
-- conclusion that the search-courtship flash codes of all firefly species lack behavioral plasticity but not rejected ...is incorrect and does not capture the main point
B. Firefly species vary in the extent to which their search-courtship communication systems exhibit behavioral plasticity.
-- There is no discussion on extent to which firefly species vary in their search-courtship communication systems
C. There is support for the view that the firefly's search-courtship signal system exhibits considerable behavioral plasticity.
-- This is the author's point that firefly signal system exhbits behavioral plasticity.
This is the answer
D. A change in the behavioral situation impairs the flash code of at least one species of firefly.
-- Author's main point is not to show that change in behavioral situation impairs flash code...
E. The firefly's search-courtship signals are more subject to random -fluctuations than are the analogous signals of most other insects.
-- Author says other insects show plasticity and cricket shows plasticity to a lesser degree but that does not mean that signals are more subject to random fluctuations than are analogous signals of most other insects
8. The author's study indicated which of the following regarding the paired courtship flashes in a species of firefly?A. The two flashes arc of different intensities.
-- Intensity is not discussed rather simple vs complex or duration is discussed or rapidly changing info
B. The two flashes have different durations.
-- single search and paired do have different durations
This is the answer
C. The average time interval between the two flashes changes after the male has landed.
-- After the firefly lands, there is no info about that in the passage
D. The male does not receive an answer to the first of the two flashes.
-- It is incorrect as the "Typically, each male flash emitted at the search interval was answered by females, but females answered only after the second of the closely paired flashes"
E. The first of the two flashes is not detected by the female.
-- It is incorrect as the "Typically, each male flash emitted at the search interval was answered by females, but females answered only after the second of the closely paired flashes"
9. Which of the following, if true, would best serve as a basis for broadening the scope of the author's conclusion regarding the behavioral plasticity of the firefly's photic signal system?A. Several recently identified firefly species differ with regard to their flash intensities.
-- Flash intensity differences in firefly species will not bolster plasticity argument. If they have differing flash intensity then it would
B. Thermal conditions influence the length of the latency period between the male's signal and the female's answering signal.
-- It broadens the scope in a way that thermal conditions influence latency period and hence in summer vs winter the latency period could be different. the flash code will change and hence variant
This is the answer
C. There is a specific neural mechanism that enables the male to dim his flashes.
-- It talks about neural mechanism discussion which takes it to different tangent....
D. During search, an answering female may be located in the underbrush, on a bush, or on a tree.
-- Where female may be located is outside the scope of the argument
E. Soon after mating, the female of a species preys on males or a different species by imitating the female flash pattern of that species.[/box_in][/box_out][/align]
--