Thats semi-correct (when talking about the missing efficiency of a non-hard-math approach in this case).
Theres no order mentioned, in which the balls were grabbed. So we have two ways (W+B and B+W).
Without much further math, we can argue, that if the probability of 1B + 1W is 50/90, it must result in: (5/10*5/9+5/10*5/9).
That leads us to the conclusion, that both colours must be present in a quantity of five.
In general i agree with you, that a math-approach might be the safer way.
Thats my first day doing DS, but im certain that a mix is the way to go.
hr1212
ccarson
Statement 1: honestly, I didn't use math for this which may mean I'm incorrect but if my logic is correct, this is what I was thinking. given the information that there is a 16/45 chance to get both a red and white ball, we have no information on if the remaining 29/45 chance is more heavily weighted towards red or white. therefore, since we cant determine if there is a higher chance of getting one ball or the other, Statement 1 is insufficient
Statement 2: you're able to find out what the chances are for getting a red ball if you were to decide to solve for it. since you can do that, then you'd also be able to find out what the chances are to getting both white balls. Statement 2 is sufficient
the answer is B
I would suggest that it's always safer to do math for DS questions unless you are short on time, because what I have observed for high quality questions is that they often lead to the default assumption trap where you assume something obvious, let's say a quadratic equation will have 2 roots and hence 2 solutions but on solving you might realize that it was a perfect square with a single root. Similarly, you would sometimes see that both the statements are providing same information if rearranged with some basic match but it ends up giving a mirage like feel and forcing people to choose obvious incorrect choice.
To clarify, let's tweak the probability value in statement 1 slightly. Let the probability to select one red and one white ball be equal to 25/45. Then by your logic, the remaining probability 20/45 also wouldn't give us any indication on which side the probability is more weighted on, and hence would seem insufficient. But now if we solve it mathematically, we get,
\(r*(10 - r) = 25\)
\(r^2 - 10r + 25 = 0\)
\((r - 5)^2 = 0\)
\(r = 5\)
which means no. of white balls are also 5, hence the statement would have been sufficient.