Question 1:
The passage is primarily concerned with
Correct Answer: E. challenging the overemphasis on a prominent aspect of a movement
Explanation: The passage critiques the dominant focus on the Seitosha (an elite group of women writers and intellectuals) in the history of Japanese feminist movements, arguing that their influence has been overstated. It points out that while Seitosha sparked debates on gender equality in urban centers, most rural women—whose concerns were more about economic survival and basic healthcare—were largely left out of these discussions. This suggests the author is challenging the tendency to overemphasize the Seitosha's impact on the feminist movement.
Question 2:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to include which of the following among those “economic responsibilities” referred to in the highlighted text?
Correct Answer: B. Overseeing household finances and farm operations
Explanation: The passage indicates that rural women faced greater economic responsibilities as men migrated to industrial centers. In a rural context, these responsibilities would likely include managing household finances and overseeing farm operations. The other options either focus on urban industrial jobs or specific reforms, which are not directly aligned with the passage’s description of rural women's day-to-day economic burdens.
Question 3:
The existence of which of the following would most seriously undermine the author’s argument concerning the feminist movements in early twentieth-century Japan?
Correct Answer: A. Letters from rural women expressing strong support for the Seitosha’s intellectual debates
Explanation: The author argues that the Seitosha’s intellectual debates, while significant in urban areas, did not resonate with or affect the majority of rural women, whose primary concerns were economic survival and basic healthcare. If there were evidence (such as letters) showing that rural women were strongly engaged with or supportive of the Seitosha’s debates, it would directly contradict the claim that the movement’s influence was overstated and confined to a narrow, elite audience.