- Given facts:
- Venus: visible every day in April and May.
- Jupiter: visible every day in April and on two days in May.
- The five-planet event happened exactly once in 2012.
- The event requires “visible after dusk,” not just general visibility.
(1) In April in Area X, Jupiter and Venus were visible between dusk and midnight.
- only a timing qualification for Jupiter and Venus in April (after dusk, up to midnight).
- It says nothing about Mercury, Mars, or Saturn in April.
- Without those three, we cannot confirm the five-planet event occurred in April or May.
Conclusion: Statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
(2) Mercury, Mars, and Saturn were all visible on the same day after dusk for three continuous days that were not in May.
- This guarantees the “triple” (Mercury–Mars–Saturn) for three consecutive days outside May.
- Those three days could be in April, or in any other month (e.g., June).
- If they happened in April, then Venus and Jupiter were visible in April (from the prompt), potentially satisfying the five-planet condition; if they happened in another month, Venus/Jupiter visibility is unknown and the event may not occur then.
Conclusion: Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Combining statements (1) and (2)
- If the triple occurred in April:
- From (1), Jupiter and Venus were visible after dusk in April.
- From (2), Mercury, Mars, and Saturn were visible after dusk for three consecutive days (not in May), which could be April.
- Thus, the event could have occurred in April, giving a “Yes.”
- If the triple occurred in a different month (not May):
- (1) says nothing about any month other than April.
- we cannot assert Venus or Jupiter were visible after dusk in that other month.
- The event could fail to occur there, giving a “No.”
Because the triple’s three-day run could be either in April (Yes) or in another month (No), even together the statements don’t pin down whether the unique event happened within April–May.
hence: E (Statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient)