Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 19:11 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 19:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Tucky
Joined: 17 Feb 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
46
 [15]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 33
Kudos: 46
 [15]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
namculpa
Joined: 24 Nov 2025
Last visit: 01 Dec 2025
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Tucky
Joined: 17 Feb 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
46
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 33
Kudos: 46
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
namculpa
Joined: 24 Nov 2025
Last visit: 01 Dec 2025
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
" Even after swing had run its course, the theory goes, the machinery of the popular music industry continued to prop up the “threadbare” idiom, seducing musicians into going through the motions long after they had any legitimate artistic reason to do so. In other words, mass-market capitalism was a logjam in the path of musical evolution that could be removed only by explosive force. Bebop provided that force."

So does that not mean commericialism was a cause of swing's decline?


Tucky


Author shares his views in P4:
This insistence that bebop is anticommercial may suit the needs of contemporary jazz discourse, but it is a poor basis for historical inquiry. It idealizes the circumstances of artistic creation and represses the unpleasant reality that commercial relations permeate all realms of musical entertainment. For the musicians who originated bebop, mass-market capitalism was not a prison from which the true artist was duty-bound to escape, but a system of transactions defining music as a profession, thereby making their achievements possible.

Look at the ABOVE bold highlighted ones. The author says that Commercial relations were conducive for the origins for Bepop, but never said anything about how commercialism contributed to the decline of swing music. Hence A wrong and B is right.


(A) Historical inquiry into the origins of bebop has tended to overemphasize the commercial causes of swing music’s artistic decline.

(B) Typical accounts of the origins of bebop misrepresent the relationship of bebop’s originators to mass-market capitalism.
User avatar
Tucky
Joined: 17 Feb 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 33
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
these are NOT the Author's views. Those are Writers'/Historians' views. It may help to navigate the passage again.
namculpa
" Even after swing had run its course, the theory goes, the machinery of the popular music industry continued to prop up the “threadbare” idiom, seducing musicians into going through the motions long after they had any legitimate artistic reason to do so. In other words, mass-market capitalism was a logjam in the path of musical evolution that could be removed only by explosive force. Bebop provided that force."

So does that not mean commericialism was a cause of swing's decline?



User avatar
Priyank1905
Joined: 05 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 23
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It felt like a tough passage. It took me 20 minutes to complete the RC. The passage felt confusing and it is having so much information which is a little confusing for the brain to understand. It took me 6 minutes to read and understand the passage and 14 minutes to solve the questions. Got 5 correct out of 8 questions (5/8).

Definitely felt like a 700+ level passage to me
User avatar
ReetArora
Joined: 19 Jan 2022
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 29
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel Sajjad1994 KarishmaB
This passage felt quite confusing , went 4 wrong out of 8. How to deal with such passage? Please help.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,856
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,856
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ReetArora
Bunuel Sajjad1994 KarishmaB
This passage felt quite confusing , went 4 wrong out of 8. How to deal with such passage? Please help.
Hello ReetArora

To crack such dense history passages, concentration is the key if you lost track of information you will not get the desired outcome.

  • Read the first paragraph very carefully to understand what kind of debate is being offered.
  • Pay attention to the twist and key words and see what author is trying to convey. [General opinion vs Author's point of view]
  • Keywords shape the opinions so keep track of all important key words. [In contrast to, But, although, In addition to, Contrary to this and so on]
  • Do not dive into detail and examples too much and keep in mind you will return to the passage to read it again for detail questions.
  • Go with passage from paragraph to paragraph and try to see and conceptualize the bigger picture or the main structure of the subject matter being discussed in the passage.
  • Lastly, you don't need to get all hard questions correct to get a good score, even if you are not sure on a question do not think much of it and try to get over the next question on the screen.
Good luck!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts