johnnyGMAT2k10
MisterEko
I have the same trouble with that approach on CR, with the exception of boldface questions, where you know what it is as soon as you see the bold print. I found diagramming and note taking helps.
On the CR, despite what some of the CR study books say, I think note taking/diagramming can certainly benefit some test takers, but I don't think i should be the recommended course for everyone. That is, I think
MGMAT basically says that everyone should do it, and IMHO that is overreaching. People should experiment with various techniques on it, but I find that all it does is slow me down. Then again, i'm used to the LSAT CR and law school which sort of helps focus those skills.
Personally, I simply read critically from top to bottom and think about any issues or openings I see as I read down. Then, I just go through the question choices and if you've been thinking critically going down you can usually cross of 3 of the answers straight away as they are not even close to being relevant to the question.
The only exception for me is with the bold print questions. For me, what I have found helps most is:
(1) read the passage
(2) before looking at any answer, formulate in my own mind the relationship between the bolded parts (e.g., evidence that supports a conclusion and that conclusion, evidence that supports a conclusion and evidence that undermines that other evidence, etc.);
(3) then find that among the answer choices.
I find that if I look at the answers before determining in my own mind the relationship, it makes it a much slower process as often some of the answer choices are worded in such a way that you can get easily confused if you haven't formulated an idea of the answer before you read it.