Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 09:44 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 09:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mejia401
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Last visit: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
1,438
 [18]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Posts: 251
Kudos: 1,438
 [18]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
SyedHazari
Joined: 05 Mar 2014
Last visit: 23 Mar 2014
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
6
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 4
Kudos: 6
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
crimson_noise
Joined: 14 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V85 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V85 DI77
Posts: 57
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
33,431
 [2]
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,431
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
crimson_noise
Can you please explain why option D is incorrect - "ASD is most likely cause by a combination of genetic, rather than environmental, factors"?
If lack of empathy is from environmental factors like family then that is an inaccurate indicator of ASD.
crimson_noise Great question! This option can seem relevant at first glance, so let's clarify why it's not the right assumption.

The Key Issue: What is the Conclusion Actually Claiming?

Look carefully at the conclusion:

"Such conduct is a clear indication of a lack of empathy within these patients."

The argument is claiming that the behavior (not pointing things out) reveals an internal state (lack of empathy) in people who already have ASD.

The argument is NOT claiming:
  • That lack of empathy indicates someone has ASD
  • What causes ASD
  • What causes lack of empathy

Why Option D is Incorrect

Option D discusses what causes ASD (genetic vs. environmental factors). But this is completely outside the scope of the argument's logic.

Your reasoning was: "If lack of empathy is from environmental factors like family, then that is an inaccurate indicator of ASD."

This would be relevant IF the conclusion were: "Lack of empathy indicates ASD"

But that's not what the argument says. The conclusion is: "This behavior (in ASD patients) indicates lack of empathy"

The Core Logical Gap:
  1. Premise: ASD patients don't point out items of interest (BEHAVIOR)
  2. Conclusion: This indicates they lack empathy (INTERNAL STATE)

Whether ASD is caused by genetic or environmental factors has no bearing on whether a behavior can reveal an internal state. The causation of ASD is irrelevant to this inference.

The correct answer is B because it bridges the gap between observable behavior and internal states - which is exactly what the argument assumes when moving from "doesn't point things out" to "lacks empathy."

Does this clarify why D doesn't work as an assumption for this specific argument?
User avatar
crimson_noise
Joined: 14 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V85 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V85 DI77
Posts: 57
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks!
I seemed to have missed the primary point of the question.
egmat

crimson_noise Great question! This option can seem relevant at first glance, so let's clarify why it's not the right assumption.

The Key Issue: What is the Conclusion Actually Claiming?

Look carefully at the conclusion:

"Such conduct is a clear indication of a lack of empathy within these patients."

The argument is claiming that the behavior (not pointing things out) reveals an internal state (lack of empathy) in people who already have ASD.

The argument is NOT claiming:
  • That lack of empathy indicates someone has ASD
  • What causes ASD
  • What causes lack of empathy

Why Option D is Incorrect

Option D discusses what causes ASD (genetic vs. environmental factors). But this is completely outside the scope of the argument's logic.

Your reasoning was: "If lack of empathy is from environmental factors like family, then that is an inaccurate indicator of ASD."

This would be relevant IF the conclusion were: "Lack of empathy indicates ASD"

But that's not what the argument says. The conclusion is: "This behavior (in ASD patients) indicates lack of empathy"

The Core Logical Gap:
  1. Premise: ASD patients don't point out items of interest (BEHAVIOR)
  2. Conclusion: This indicates they lack empathy (INTERNAL STATE)

Whether ASD is caused by genetic or environmental factors has no bearing on whether a behavior can reveal an internal state. The causation of ASD is irrelevant to this inference.

The correct answer is B because it bridges the gap between observable behavior and internal states - which is exactly what the argument assumes when moving from "doesn't point things out" to "lacks empathy."

Does this clarify why D doesn't work as an assumption for this specific argument?
User avatar
Erick1802
Joined: 11 Jan 2026
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Correct Answer: B
B. It is possible to derive information about internal states from behavioral data alone.

The Logical Gap
The argument suffers from a "Behavior vs. Mindset" gap. Here is the breakdown of the logic:

Premise (The Observation): People with ASD often do not point at things (a physical behavior).

Conclusion (The Internal State): Therefore, they lack empathy (a mental/emotional state).

The Flaw: The author assumes that a lack of a specific outward action (pointing) must be caused by a specific internal deficiency (lack of empathy).

However, there could be many other reasons why someone wouldn't point. Perhaps they feel the empathy but simply don't express it through that specific gesture. To conclude that they lack empathy based only on the fact that they don't point, you must assume that behavior is a perfect, readable map of a person's internal world.

Why the other options fail:
A: This discusses the "most common" symptom. The frequency of symptoms doesn't help us prove that pointing (or lack thereof) equals a lack of empathy.

C: Understanding social requirements in a lab doesn't bridge the gap between a physical gesture and the internal feeling of empathy.

D: The cause of ASD (genetics vs. environment) is irrelevant to whether a specific symptom proves a lack of empathy.

E: This provides an additional symptom (difficulty with irony), but it doesn't provide the logical link needed to validate the conclusion about empathy and pointing.

The "Negation Test"
A great way to check an assumption is to negate it. If you "flip" Choice B to say, "It is not possible to derive internal states from behavioral data alone," the entire argument falls apart. If you can't read the mind through behavior, then the fact that they don't point tells you nothing about their level of empathy.
User avatar
crimson_noise
Joined: 14 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V85 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V85 DI77
Posts: 57
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat

crimson_noise Great question! This option can seem relevant at first glance, so let's clarify why it's not the right assumption.

The Key Issue: What is the Conclusion Actually Claiming?

Look carefully at the conclusion:

"Such conduct is a clear indication of a lack of empathy within these patients."

The argument is claiming that the behavior (not pointing things out) reveals an internal state (lack of empathy) in people who already have ASD.

The argument is NOT claiming:
  • That lack of empathy indicates someone has ASD
  • What causes ASD
  • What causes lack of empathy

Why Option D is Incorrect

Option D discusses what causes ASD (genetic vs. environmental factors). But this is completely outside the scope of the argument's logic.

Your reasoning was: "If lack of empathy is from environmental factors like family, then that is an inaccurate indicator of ASD."

This would be relevant IF the conclusion were: "Lack of empathy indicates ASD"

But that's not what the argument says. The conclusion is: "This behavior (in ASD patients) indicates lack of empathy"

The Core Logical Gap:
  1. Premise: ASD patients don't point out items of interest (BEHAVIOR)
  2. Conclusion: This indicates they lack empathy (INTERNAL STATE)

Whether ASD is caused by genetic or environmental factors has no bearing on whether a behavior can reveal an internal state. The causation of ASD is irrelevant to this inference.

The correct answer is B because it bridges the gap between observable behavior and internal states - which is exactly what the argument assumes when moving from "doesn't point things out" to "lacks empathy."

Does this clarify why D doesn't work as an assumption for this specific argument?

Thank you! I confused environmental and behavioural factors.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts