Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 16:06 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 16:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
imoi
Joined: 11 Jul 2014
Last visit: 30 Oct 2014
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 26
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rxn
Joined: 15 May 2013
Last visit: 17 Nov 2014
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gmatbattle
Joined: 28 May 2014
Last visit: 03 Apr 2020
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
GMAT Date: 08-20-2014
Posts: 33
Kudos: 230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
evansgherzi
User avatar
Economist GMAT Tutor Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2014
Last visit: 15 Sep 2014
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 110
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

In reference to the Quant, I can provide you some tips specifically on integrated reasoning:

The changes to the new GMAT are relatively minor. The new GMAT replaced one of the two essays from the AWA with a new integrated reasoning section. 90% of what you will have already learned will be valid for the new section. You will only need to spend a few more hours to learn the new Integrated Reasoning section. It is a short section, not even as close in time and effort as the verbal or quant require.

According to mba.com (you can also watch some videos on the IR section and get additional info here) the Integrated Reasoning section consists of one 30-minute section, made up of 12 questions stemming from 4 question types. A prompt or question type might have multiple questions that go with it. There may also be a necessity for switching between ’tabs’ within a question prompt/type. Basically these new question types are graphic in nature and require, for the most part, an ability to analyze data (words, charts, graphs, etc) in order to come up with key insights that require math skills and verbal skills.

The IR section in the exam is not part of the 200-800 score and is non-adaptive. It is graded separately on a scale of 1 to 8. More importantly, it is very possible that many schools will not look at that section as important for now, as it will probably take them some time to determine what an appropriate score is for their particular programs. However, please check with the school programs you are applying to. Most schools have not posted how much they wish to see on the IR section because this does not seem to be a concern for now. Do check though.

Your job is to try to do the best you can there but the concentration should still be on the Verbal and Quant sections. The good news is that you do not need much new raw knowledge but rather you need to become familiar with the question types and practice a bit there so there are no surprises. This section has more of a 'wow' factor as it is graphic and the questions are very different than what has come before so this is what scares people but it shouldn't because of the reasons outlined above.

Hope this helps.

Sincerely,
Evan
User avatar
OutOfTheHills
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Last visit: 07 Mar 2015
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 29
Kudos: 21
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
evansgherzi
Hi,

In reference to the Quant, I can provide you some tips specifically on integrated reasoning:

The changes to the new GMAT are relatively minor. The new GMAT replaced one of the two essays from the AWA with a new integrated reasoning section. 90% of what you will have already learned will be valid for the new section. You will only need to spend a few more hours to learn the new Integrated Reasoning section. It is a short section, not even as close in time and effort as the verbal or quant require.

According to mba.com (you can also watch some videos on the IR section and get additional info here) the Integrated Reasoning section consists of one 30-minute section, made up of 12 questions stemming from 4 question types. A prompt or question type might have multiple questions that go with it. There may also be a necessity for switching between ’tabs’ within a question prompt/type. Basically these new question types are graphic in nature and require, for the most part, an ability to analyze data (words, charts, graphs, etc) in order to come up with key insights that require math skills and verbal skills.

The IR section in the exam is not part of the 200-800 score and is non-adaptive. It is graded separately on a scale of 1 to 8. More importantly, it is very possible that many schools will not look at that section as important for now, as it will probably take them some time to determine what an appropriate score is for their particular programs. However, please check with the school programs you are applying to. Most schools have not posted how much they wish to see on the IR section because this does not seem to be a concern for now. Do check though.

Your job is to try to do the best you can there but the concentration should still be on the Verbal and Quant sections. The good news is that you do not need much new raw knowledge but rather you need to become familiar with the question types and practice a bit there so there are no surprises. This section has more of a 'wow' factor as it is graphic and the questions are very different than what has come before so this is what scares people but it shouldn't because of the reasons outlined above.

Hope this helps.

Sincerely,
Evan

Evan,

Your reply has absolutely nothing to do with what was asked, why are you posting about IR when it wasn't even mentioned in the original post? There has been a trend on this forum of Economist tutors who copy and paste or just directly link to a blog post that has nothing to do with what ever was posted. These "advice" posts just come off as lazy, disingenuous, and sleazy. Rather than actually helping posters with informative replies and tips, your posts dilute any actual discussions and waste the time of the original poster and anyone else who is reading this thread hoping for actual advice. This is doing a big disservice for your brand.
User avatar
imoi
Joined: 11 Jul 2014
Last visit: 30 Oct 2014
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 26
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OutOfTheHills


Evan,

Your reply has absolutely nothing to do with what was asked, why are you posting about IR when it wasn't even mentioned in the original post? There has been a trend on this forum of Economist tutors who copy and paste or just directly link to a blog post that has nothing to do with what ever was posted. These "advice" posts just come off as lazy, disingenuous, and sleazy. Rather than actually helping posters with informative replies and tips, your posts dilute any actual discussions and waste the time of the original poster and anyone else who is reading this thread hoping for actual advice. This is doing a big disservice for your brand.

They have to do their SEO, right? But yeah I know what you mean. Any tips on my questions above by any chance? should probably also say I figured where I am stuck now is 47-48 quant and want to get to 51
User avatar
OutOfTheHills
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Last visit: 07 Mar 2015
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 29
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imoi
OutOfTheHills


Evan,

Your reply has absolutely nothing to do with what was asked, why are you posting about IR when it wasn't even mentioned in the original post? There has been a trend on this forum of Economist tutors who copy and paste or just directly link to a blog post that has nothing to do with what ever was posted. These "advice" posts just come off as lazy, disingenuous, and sleazy. Rather than actually helping posters with informative replies and tips, your posts dilute any actual discussions and waste the time of the original poster and anyone else who is reading this thread hoping for actual advice. This is doing a big disservice for your brand.

They have to do their SEO, right? But yeah I know what you mean. Any tips on my questions above by any chance? should probably also say I figured where I am stuck now is 47-48 quant and want to get to 51

I really wish I had a definitive answer for you but I am in the process of preparing for my GMAT as well and my quant score is in the same range as yours. I have also run into the exact same problem as you where I spend a lot of time doing a problem only to find out my answer doesn't match any of the OAs. At the moment, I feel like my time will be better spent on raising my Verbal to where my quant is rather than push my quant to 51. I feel like this is the more effective way of raising my overall score.
User avatar
imoi
Joined: 11 Jul 2014
Last visit: 30 Oct 2014
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 26
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OutOfTheHills
imoi
OutOfTheHills


Evan,

Your reply has absolutely nothing to do with what was asked, why are you posting about IR when it wasn't even mentioned in the original post? There has been a trend on this forum of Economist tutors who copy and paste or just directly link to a blog post that has nothing to do with what ever was posted. These "advice" posts just come off as lazy, disingenuous, and sleazy. Rather than actually helping posters with informative replies and tips, your posts dilute any actual discussions and waste the time of the original poster and anyone else who is reading this thread hoping for actual advice. This is doing a big disservice for your brand.

They have to do their SEO, right? But yeah I know what you mean. Any tips on my questions above by any chance? should probably also say I figured where I am stuck now is 47-48 quant and want to get to 51

I really wish I had a definitive answer for you but I am in the process of preparing for my GMAT as well and my quant score is in the same range as yours. I have also run into the exact same problem as you where I spend a lot of time doing a problem only to find out my answer doesn't match any of the OAs. At the moment, I feel like my time will be better spent on raising my Verbal to where my quant is rather than push my quant to 51. I feel like this is the more effective way of raising my overall score.

You are absolutely right. I once failed math to 50% (don't look at me) but got 96% on verbal and overall was 700. So yes verbal weights more. My issue is that I am applying for MSc not MBA so I need quant more than verbal. But good luck anyways!
Moderators:
193 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
473 posts