Hi,
In reference to the Quant, I can provide you some tips specifically on integrated reasoning:
The changes to the new GMAT are relatively minor. The new GMAT replaced one of the two essays from the AWA with a new integrated reasoning section. 90% of what you will have already learned will be valid for the new section. You will only need to spend a few more hours to learn the new Integrated Reasoning section. It is a short section, not even as close in time and effort as the verbal or quant require.
According to mba.com (you can also watch some videos on the IR section and get additional info here) the Integrated Reasoning section consists of one 30-minute section, made up of 12 questions stemming from 4 question types. A prompt or question type might have multiple questions that go with it. There may also be a necessity for switching between ’tabs’ within a question prompt/type. Basically these new question types are graphic in nature and require, for the most part, an ability to analyze data (words, charts, graphs, etc) in order to come up with key insights that require math skills and verbal skills.
The IR section in the exam is not part of the 200-800 score and is non-adaptive. It is graded separately on a scale of 1 to 8. More importantly, it is very possible that many schools will not look at that section as important for now, as it will probably take them some time to determine what an appropriate score is for their particular programs. However, please check with the school programs you are applying to. Most schools have not posted how much they wish to see on the IR section because this does not seem to be a concern for now. Do check though.
Your job is to try to do the best you can there but the concentration should still be on the Verbal and Quant sections. The good news is that you do not need much new raw knowledge but rather you need to become familiar with the question types and practice a bit there so there are no surprises. This section has more of a 'wow' factor as it is graphic and the questions are very different than what has come before so this is what scares people but it shouldn't because of the reasons outlined above.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Evan
Your reply has absolutely nothing to do with what was asked, why are you posting about IR when it wasn't even mentioned in the original post? There has been a trend on this forum of Economist tutors who copy and paste or just directly link to a blog post that has nothing to do with what ever was posted. These "advice" posts just come off as lazy, disingenuous, and sleazy. Rather than actually helping posters with informative replies and tips, your posts dilute any actual discussions and waste the time of the original poster and anyone else who is reading this thread hoping for actual advice. This is doing a big disservice for your brand.