Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 17:49 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 17:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,468
 [14]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
810,468
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,468
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Elliefry
Joined: 06 Sep 2015
Last visit: 20 Mar 2016
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shashanksagar
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Last visit: 14 Oct 2019
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
Posts: 62
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dont agree, how do we even know how much area of bangladesh is covered with mountains, it may be 1% of total terrestrial area or coal fields.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shashanksagar
dont agree, how do we even know how much area of bangladesh is covered with mountains, it may be 1% of total terrestrial area or coal fields.

Option C could be a valid explanation, if the surface mining in mountainous area is considerable in comparison to total surface mining in Bangladesh. The question states "Which of the following, if true, MOST HELPS to account for....". Since the choice C could be an explanation and the others could not be, option C is the best answer.
User avatar
nealz
Joined: 18 Jun 2015
Last visit: 21 Sep 2022
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 20
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As per option B the demand is decreased. and the supply has no effect, Hence the cost will be decreased.
Although option C holds good too. May I know why to negate option B when compared to C.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nealz
As per option B the demand is decreased. and the supply has no effect, Hence the cost will be decreased.
Although option C holds good too. May I know why to negate option B when compared to C.

The question is about the cost of reclamation of mined-out land. The price of coal is not the topic of argument - option B discusses the cost of coal, not the cost of reclamation mined-out land.
avatar
pvergadia
Joined: 06 May 2016
Last visit: 25 Jul 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 5
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
nealz
As per option B the demand is decreased. and the supply has no effect, Hence the cost will be decreased.
Although option C holds good too. May I know why to negate option B when compared to C.

The question is about the cost of reclamation of mined-out land. The price of coal is not the topic of argument - option B discusses the cost of coal, not the cost of reclamation mined-out land.

I am struggling with this one. Option B says that demand of coal has decreased, I am not seeing any indication of cost here? Am I missing something? I picked B over C because I thought we are not aware how much of the area has mountains. Can anyone help clarify my doubt.

Thanks for the help!
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pvergadia
sayantanc2k
nealz
As per option B the demand is decreased. and the supply has no effect, Hence the cost will be decreased.
Although option C holds good too. May I know why to negate option B when compared to C.

The question is about the cost of reclamation of mined-out land. The price of coal is not the topic of argument - option B discusses the cost of coal, not the cost of reclamation mined-out land.

I am struggling with this one. Option B says that demand of coal has decreased, I am not seeing any indication of cost here? Am I missing something? I picked B over C because I thought we are not aware how much of the area has mountains. Can anyone help clarify my doubt.

Thanks for the help!

The question is about the reclamation cost of coal mines. It does not matter what happens to the cost or demand of coal. Option B is totally out of scope ( If instead of coal, iron or clothes or any other item were mentioned in option B, it would be equally out of scope.)

The following post explains why option C is correct - this is a strengthening question, not an assumption question. A could be condition is enough, a must be condition is not required:
v07-184946.html#p1711245
avatar
Sushilait84
Joined: 29 Jul 2016
Last visit: 04 Mar 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Twenty years ago, Bangladesh put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four takas per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect. Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?

A. Even after Bangladesh began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, coal mines in Bangladesh continued to be less expensive to operate than coal mines in almost any other country.
B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Bangladesh because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.
D. Even after Bangladesh began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than underground mines.
E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in Bangladesh today comes from surface mines.

Hi,

i have a question. how is seizing operation due to is high cost of reclamation strengthens the conclusion that the Cost of reclamation has reduced?
it is very much possible to have low cost of reclamation due to less mining.

Regards

Sushil Kumar
User avatar
RK007
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Last visit: 27 Feb 2020
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Given Kudos: 222
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Posts: 64
Kudos: 49
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation.
avatar
delirium77
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jul 2020
Last visit: 19 Oct 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 81
Location: United States (MI)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.43
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V36
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation.
avatar
KanikaRajput
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 26 Feb 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a doubt regarding option E.
Reclamation cost per ton of coal 20 year ago > reclamation cost per ton of coal now
Parameter of consideration: Reclamation cost/ton of coal
Now if this parameter is decreasing, this could imply that from reclamation of a particular site of land more tones of coal is being mined. Can't this be a possible explanation.
Therefore option E also seems like a possible explanation to me
User avatar
RafZaf
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 27 Apr 2020
Last visit: 12 Sep 2023
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V44
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V44
Posts: 70
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Why is B out of scope ?
Use of coal drops > demand drops > price in market drops > cost at which coal is to be sourced, i.e, reclamation cost has to drop to adjust with market conditions.

On the other hand, Bangladesh might have less than 1% mountainous area and mine operators stopping working in the areas might have nil impact on the average cost.
User avatar
Rance14
Joined: 24 May 2023
Last visit: 26 Oct 2024
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 205
Location: India
Posts: 47
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyMurray

Can you please explain this question?

In option C - how are we supposed to asses what % of Bangladesh's areas are mountainous? Without that information, we are just basing this on an assumption which seems very unlike GMAT CR questions.

Also, why is option B incorrect? If the use of coal has dropped -> its demand has fallen -> hence its price has fallen -> hence, the cost to source coal from the mines has also fallen
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,149
Own Kudos:
83,693
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,671
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,149
Kudos: 83,693
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rance14
GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyMurray

Can you please explain this question?

In option C - how are we supposed to asses what % of Bangladesh's areas are mountainous? Without that information, we are just basing this on an assumption which seems very unlike GMAT CR questions.

Also, why is option B incorrect? If the use of coal has dropped -> its demand has fallen -> hence its price has fallen -> hence, the cost to source coal from the mines has also fallen
I think you can argue this is the "best" optoin to explain the difference, better than others.
However, i completely agree with you and a few other folsk that this is not a bullet-proof question, I permanently took this quesiton out of commission and circulation as we have higher quality CR's in the tests. I have provied you with 2 weeks of GMAT Club tests for help calling out this question.

About option B, the price in question is per ton of extracted coal, so the growth/reduction does not matter as much in total as the cost is on a per unit basis. Even if the coal cost is free, the cost of land reclamation has not changed.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109728 posts
Founder
43149 posts