Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 08:40 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 08:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
faceharshit
Joined: 26 Feb 2014
Last visit: 27 Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
55
 [55]
Posts: 3
Kudos: 55
 [55]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
54
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,814
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,871
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,814
Kudos: 811,023
 [55]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
49
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 03 Jan 2026
Posts: 520
Own Kudos:
2,584
 [8]
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 520
Kudos: 2,584
 [8]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,882
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,882
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
faceharshit
Hi friends,
Need your help to approach below Inequality problem :-

Is |n| < 1 ?

1) n^x - n < 0 2) x^-1 = -2


My sol:

1. n (n^(x-1) - 1) < 0
so either n is less than zero OR n^(x-1) - 1 < 0

2. x = -1/2

Clueless on how to analyze above and conclude some answer.
Dear faceharshit,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

In writing these questions, I would urge you to pay more attention to mathematical grouping symbols. You can read more about this concept here:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-quant ... g-symbols/

In this question, clearly statement #1 is insufficient by itself, because we know nothing about x. Clearly, statement #2 is insufficient by itself because we know nothing about n. Clearly, we have to combine them to figure anything out.

From #2, you are correct, we get x = -1/2. Plug this into #1

[n^(-1/2)] - n < 0

Notice, first of all, that we could not make any sensible statement if n were negative, because the square root of a negative is outside the real number system. The fact that this is an ordinary sensible statement automatically precludes negatives. It also precludes n - 0, because 0^(-1/2) is undefined. Add n to both sides.

n^(-1/2) < n

Since we know that n^(-1/2) is positive, divide both sides by that.

1 < n * n^(+1/2) = n^(3/2)

If the 3/2 power of a number is greater than one, then that number must be greater than one. We can answer an affirmative and definitive "no" to the prompt question. Because we can arrive at an answer, that means the combined statements must be sufficient.

Answer = (C)

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
User avatar
sunaimshadmani
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
Posts: 55
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x=-0.5, Then why doesnt n^x become "1/sq.root n"
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 03 Jan 2026
Posts: 520
Own Kudos:
2,584
 [3]
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 520
Kudos: 2,584
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunaimshadmani
If x=-0.5, Then why doesnt n^x become "1/sq.root n"

Thanks for pointing out
If x=-1/2 then the question becomes 1-n^3/2 <0 or n^3/2>1

n>1^2/3 or n>1

Sufficient

We will only have to consider one case as sqrt n is greater than 0

Ans is C

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 883
Own Kudos:
1,884
 [5]
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 883
Kudos: 1,884
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel


Is |n| < 1 ?

(1) n^x - n < 0
(2) x^(-1) = -2
\(\left| n \right|\,\,\mathop < \limits^? \,\,1\)


\(\left( 1 \right)\,\,{n^x} < n\,\,\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {n;x} \right) = \left( {2; -1} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {n;x} \right) = \left( {{1 \over 2};2} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)


\(\left( 2 \right)\,\,{1 \over x} = - 2\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,x = - {1 \over 2}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{INSUFF}}.\,\,\,\,\left( {{\rm{trivially}}} \right)\)


\(\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\,{1 \over {\sqrt n }} < n\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{{\rm{implicitly}}} \,\,\,\,n > 0 \hfill \cr \\
\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\sqrt n \,\, > \,\,0} \,\,\,n\sqrt n > 1\, \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{SUFF}}.\)

\(\left( * \right)\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,n > 0 \hfill \cr \\
\,\left| n \right| < 1 \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,0 < n < 1\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,0 < \sqrt n < 1 \hfill \cr \\
\,0 < n < 1 \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,0 < n\sqrt n < 1\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,{\rm{impossible}}\)


The correct answer is therefore (C), indeed.


This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
User avatar
swatib28
Joined: 21 May 2015
Last visit: 06 Sep 2022
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 18
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Can you please check my below explanation and suggests where am i going wrong ?
Below while working on C choice , we assume that N is +ve but range for N is coming to be negative as well and satisfying the statement..

Whats going wrong here? Please suggest.
Attachments

CamScanner 03-09-2021 08.15.15_1.pdf [363.38 KiB]
Downloaded 80 times

User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,974
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,974
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109814 posts
498 posts
212 posts