Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 23:03 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 23:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aashu4uiit
Joined: 02 May 2012
Last visit: 09 Apr 2015
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
753
 [45]
Given Kudos: 114
Posts: 58
Kudos: 753
 [45]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
38
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
15,571
 [37]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,571
 [37]
34
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 998
Own Kudos:
3,080
 [7]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 998
Kudos: 3,080
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
thangvietname
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 514
Own Kudos:
573
 [3]
Given Kudos: 916
Posts: 514
Kudos: 573
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
most, if not all gmat passage, are well structured and hard to understand , followed by easy question testing the understanding of the passages. this case is opposite to the case created by prep companies, in which passages are too easy, and not well structured and followed by very hard questions.

gmat test us ability to understand the passages and to infer from information in the passage. I think prep companies' passages test only the inference.

I alway see that the gmat typical passages are harder than the prep companies tests.
avatar
KM2018AA
Joined: 11 Sep 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2021
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
21
 [2]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GPA: 3
WE:Sales (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Posts: 62
Kudos: 21
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For the Q-3, can you please explain as to how can we conclude the same about Phanerozoic era?

The passage mentions that Mass Extinctions were Phanerozoic era phenomenon with rates low before large organisms arose. Should not this sentence structure mean that phanero era was the one wherein the extinction rates were low and was the era devoid of large organisms?
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,133
Own Kudos:
7,372
 [6]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,133
Kudos: 7,372
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanations from Veritas:

Question 1:

In this example, as is the case with many hard inference problems, you must link several pieces of information to find the proper inference. Using process of elimination, start with (A). In the first paragraph you learn that mass extinction events are based on the extinctions of easily observed, biologically complex components. You therefore have no idea from this passage how the microbial organisms are affected during a mass extinction event and (A) is incorrect. In the passage you learn that 98% of known species have become extinct but you only learn that over 50% were lost in each of the 5 major mass extinctions. You therefore cannot conclude that over 90% of complex species become extinct during a mass extinction event and (B) is also incorrect. Note: the testmakers are hoping you use the wrong data point to create this improper inference. (C), which is correct, requires that you link together two pieces of information. In the beginning of the 3rd paragraph you learn that “the five major mass extinctions have significantly exceeded the background extinction rate” and then you learn that the rate of those mass extinctions is well over 50%. This allows you to conclude that the background rate is far below 50%. In (D), you learn that marine fossils are used because they provide a better fossil record and stratification but you do not know if they are easier or more difficult to find than other types. In (E), no information is given about whether new species emerge during an extinction event so you cannot make that inference.

Answer is (C).


Question 2:

For this type of question, go find the key word (end of the last paragraph) and make the proper inference. The sentence reads: “Mass extinctions seem to be a Phanerozoic-era phenomenon, with extinction rates low before large complex organisms arose.” In the first part of the sentence you learn that mass extinctions took place during this era. In the second part you learn that the extinction rates were low before “large complex organisms arose” (i.e. before this era.) From this you can conclude definitively that this era was a time during which large, complex organisms existed and (D) is thus correct. (A) must be false from this information, as the Phanerozoic era had to overlap with those 540 million years. For (B), you have no idea from this passage about the emergence of species. Again, (C) is contradicted by this section and for (E) you cannot make this inference (and the passage suggests that number is near 98%).

Answer is (D).


Question 3:

As you learned in several previous questions, you cannot assess the impacts on microbial life from this passage so (A) is incorrect (you have no idea what the author would think). For (B), while the author references this extinction event specifically, no information is given about its significance in relation to the other major extinction events. (C) is contradicted by the passage as you learn at the end of the passage that extinction rates were low before that time period. For (D), there is direct support for this statement in the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph, in which the author states that “extinction occurs at a very uneven rate.” No information is given in the passage to support (E) so it is incorrect. Answer is (D).[/spoiler]


Question 4:

For primary purpose questions, you should focus on the scope of the passage and the intent of the author. For (A) the author does not give any specific warnings and the passage is explanatory/descriptive, not opinionated. For (B), the author does not discuss at all what has caused these mass extinction events. He simply discusses what they are and when some have occurred. For (C), the author does not present any new evidence, just discusses what is known about them now. (D) matches the scope and tone perfectly and is thus correct. For (E) there is no discussion about what will occur in the future.

Answer is (D).
avatar
Tanujm
Joined: 20 May 2019
Last visit: 16 Apr 2020
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In reference to Q3, the passage says that the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event was the most recent mass extinction event. Why can C not be inferred basis this?
User avatar
coreyander
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 31 May 2020
Last visit: 11 Jun 2024
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
1,166
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
Posts: 167
Kudos: 1,166
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanujm
In reference to Q3, the passage says that the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event was the most recent mass extinction event. Why can C not be inferred basis this?

VeritasKarishma SajjadAhmad I have the same doubt. Can you please clarify Q3, on what basis can C be eliminated?

"The most recent, the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago, was a large-scale mass extinction of animal and plant species in a geologically short period of time."


"Mass extinctions seem to be a Phanerozoic-era phenomenon, with extinction rates low before large complex organisms arose."

Cretaceous-Paleocene is most recent. Hence, Phanerozoic-era should have occurred before. Hence, (C) a time period before the Cretaceous-Paleocene era could be valid.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,389
 [3]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,389
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
coreyander
Tanujm
In reference to Q3, the passage says that the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event was the most recent mass extinction event. Why can C not be inferred basis this?

VeritasKarishma SajjadAhmad I have the same doubt. Can you please clarify Q3, on what basis can C be eliminated?

"The most recent, the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago, was a large-scale mass extinction of animal and plant species in a geologically short period of time."


"Mass extinctions seem to be a Phanerozoic-era phenomenon, with extinction rates low before large complex organisms arose."

Cretaceous-Paleocene is most recent. Hence, Phanerozoic-era should have occurred before. Hence, (C) a time period before the Cretaceous-Paleocene era could be valid.


Read these lines very carefully.

Since life began on Earth, the five major mass extinctions have significantly exceeded the background extinction rate for animal and plant species. - there have been 5 major mass extinctions.

In the past 540 million years, during each of these five major events, over 50% of animal and plant species died. - These 5 mass extinctions have taken place within the last 540 million years.

Mass extinctions seem to be a Phanerozoic-era phenomenon, with extinction rates low before large complex organisms arose. - Mass extinction is a phenomenon of Phanerozoic-era. Before this there were no large complex organisms and extinction rates were low.

This means the Phanerozoic-era is the 540 million years era in which large complex organisms arose.

Answer (D)
avatar
Pranjal3107
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Jul 2022
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,709
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
Posts: 133
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
coreyander
Tanujm
In reference to Q3, the passage says that the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event was the most recent mass extinction event. Why can C not be inferred basis this?

VeritasKarishma SajjadAhmad I have the same doubt. Can you please clarify Q3, on what basis can C be eliminated?

"The most recent, the Cretaceous–Paleocene extinction event, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago, was a large-scale mass extinction of animal and plant species in a geologically short period of time."


"Mass extinctions seem to be a Phanerozoic-era phenomenon, with extinction rates low before large complex organisms arose."

Cretaceous-Paleocene is most recent. Hence, Phanerozoic-era should have occurred before. Hence, (C) a time period before the Cretaceous-Paleocene era could be valid.


Read these lines very carefully.

Since life began on Earth, the five major mass extinctions have significantly exceeded the background extinction rate for animal and plant species. - there have been 5 major mass extinctions.

In the past 540 million years, during each of these five major events, over 50% of animal and plant species died. - These 5 mass extinctions have taken place within the last 540 million years.

Mass extinctions seem to be a Phanerozoic-era phenomenon, with extinction rates low before large complex organisms arose. - Mass extinction is a phenomenon of Phanerozoic-era. Before this there were no large complex organisms and extinction rates were low.

This means the Phanerozoic-era is the 540 million years era in which large complex organisms arose.

Answer (D)

But doesn't it suggest that the large organisms arose ? How can we infer that they existed ? I got D using elimination. But D really does not seem right as well.
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 779
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,575
Posts: 779
Kudos: 887
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pranjal3107

But doesn't it suggest that the large organisms arose ? How can we infer that they existed ? I got D using elimination. But D really does not seem right as well.

this chart might help to visualise. Red is the inferred data.

On you specific question about how can you infer that they existed..
Well if they did not exist then whose extinction happened in the past 540 million years? We already know this from the passage - "Such an event is identified by a sharp change in the diversity and abundance of macroscopic life.". So we cannot detect small-simple organism's extinction. So large complex organism must exist for a period of time before they are deemed extinct.

Hope this helps.
Attachments

Veritas_RC_help.jpg
Veritas_RC_help.jpg [ 66.77 KiB | Viewed 3003 times ]

User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,418
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,418
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts