First time posting on the forum! I'm just starting my journey through the GMAT and starting up some applications. I've always wanted to pursue an MBA for intrinsic reasons, obtaining business level knowledge/experiences/connections, as well as opening up career opportunities.
When diving into the topic of obtaining an PT MBA (through hours of Googling and talking to many close friends and family), I've come across an interesting statistic that may play heavily into the caliber of schools that I pursue. Some quick background info--I'm 26, working in the mid-west, great experiences in Fortune 10 companies, and an engineer from a top 10 engineering school (BSE/MSE). Currently, my salary is ~$100k and I know in the course of the next 5 years I can move up in the ranks and potentially bring in upwards of a ~30% increase and management/director level positions. Although salary isn't too important for me, given that I have a growing family it is not by any means something I can gloss over when looking at PT MBAs (given some of the schools I was looking into cost upwards of $130k).
Can anyone speak to the potential salary bump that comes from a PT MBA or really even a FT MBA (think Booth, Kellogg, etc.) when you already have a very competitive salary? Specifically, I'm hoping to get into the healthcare strategy (provider, payer, revenue management, etc.) space in the midwest. The more I think of it, the more I realize maybe I need to dial down the caliber of schools I'm looking at and focus more on a local PT MBA program.
I know there are numerous other factors to consider here, but I'm just hoping to get some general insights from the community!