Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 06:31 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 06:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,928
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,914
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,928
Kudos: 811,543
 [20]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Sindbad
Joined: 11 Aug 2013
Last visit: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
GPA: 3.23
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V28
Posts: 21
Kudos: 19
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sedreddin
Joined: 18 Sep 2016
Last visit: 05 Jul 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
neilphilip10
Joined: 10 May 2017
Last visit: 24 Nov 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
By manipulating the condition we get x+y>z? or x+y<-z
Therefore x+y>xy+x => is y(x-1)<0?
x+y<-(xy+x)=> is y(x+1)+2x<0?
We clearly need the signs of x and y
1) No sign of y.Insufficient
2)No sign of X. Insufficient

1)+2)=>Sufficient to prove above statements
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
1,806
 [4]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,806
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If xy + x = z, is |x+y|>z?

(1) x < 0
(2) y > 0

Given \(x(y+1)=z\), we need the values of \(x\), \(y\) & \(z\) to determine whether \(|x+y|>z\), where LHS is always positive

Statement 1: implies \(x\) is negative so \(x(y+1)\) i.e. \(z\) can be negative or it can be positive depending upon the value of \((y+1)\). But nothing is mentioned about \(y\). So insufficient


Statement 2: implies \(y\) is positive so \(x(y+1)\) i.e. \(z\) can be negative or it can be positive depending upon the value of \(x\). But nothing is mentioned about \(x\). So insufficient

Combining 1 & 2 we get \(x<0\) & \((y+1)>0\) so \(x(y+1)<0\) i.e. \(z<0\)

but \(|x+y|\) is always positive hence we get a Yes for our question stem. Sufficient

Option C
User avatar
Krishaa12
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 508
Posts: 11
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According me E is correct since y is less than zero so y=-1 x= 1 therefore z can be neget ive or +'ve while combining plz correct me if I am wrong
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,806
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krishaa12
According me E is correct since y is less than zero so y=-1 x= 1 therefore z can be neget ive or +'ve while combining plz correct me if I am wrong

Hi Krishaa12

y>0, hence it is positive, rather x<0 i.e negative

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ishan261288
Joined: 31 Oct 2018
Last visit: 04 Nov 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 285
WE:Research (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 15
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If xy + x = z, is |x + y| > z?

(1) x < 0
(2) y > 0

An alternate explanation

x(y+1) - z = 0
First take 1 and 2 both, if x is negative and y is positive, then term x(y+1) is negative, so for x(y+1) - z =0 to be true, z has to be negative so that -z is positive and x(y+1) - z =0. So from this we can deduce that z is also negative--So question stem---> |x+y| is always positive and if z is negative, so |x+y| >z is true.
Now C is correct unless we can make one out of 1 and 2 individually correct or both individually correct. Let's analyze

Take 1) x < 0, if x is negative (and y is positive or negative), nothing can be said about sign of z so we can never know |x+y| >z.
Take 2) y > 0, if y is positive (x can be positive or negative), nothing can be said about sign of z so we can never know |x+y| >z.

So answer is C
User avatar
anon7164
Joined: 14 Feb 2022
Last visit: 26 Jul 2024
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 12
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I didn't find any of the solutions very intuitive or doable in 2 minutes, so I came up with a method but I'm not entirely sure it is correct. Here it is:

Given: x(y + 1) = z
Question: Is |x+y| > z?

Restate the question by opening the absolute value bars and taking both cases.

Is |x+y| > z? is restated as
Is x + y > z --> Is x + y - z > 0
AND
Is -x - y > z --> Is -x - y - z > 0?

If the conditions given satisfy both cases above, we should be able to say that |x+y| > z.

So combine both inequalities by adding them: x + y - z + (- x - y - z) > 0? ---> -2z > 0? ---> z < 0?

We have finally restated the question as, "is z < 0?"

1) x < 0
Tells us nothing about z, insufficient.

2) y > 0
Tells us nothing about z, insufficient.

1) & 2) x < 0 and y > 0 means that x(y+1) = z is <0. Sufficient.

Not sure if I've assumed something wrong here or if there is any other error. Bunuel chetan2u would be grateful if you guys could help me with this - is this approach correct? If not, could you suggest a better method? Thanks in advance :)
Moderators:
Math Expert
109928 posts
498 posts
212 posts