Hey Everyone, this one is driving me nuts. I am trying to see if my logic is incorrect somewhere. Can we have a couple other eyes look this over and give their thoughts on my comments above?
In looking at it more, it seems to me that if P is the midpoint of AB which is shared as a corner of the square PCQD, and both the rectangle ABCD and square PCQD share points D and C which also has to be the diagonal of PCQD. Given just this information and nothing on the area of the rectangle, we can still assume that angles APD and BPC are both 45 degrees since angle DPC has to be 90 (because PCQD is a square). With just this information, we can assume AD and BC are 3 because triangles APD and BPC are 45,45,90. That would mean the area of the rectangle is 18 (3*6) which is the same as the square.
If we do not assume that PCQD is a square (even though we are told so) and we know that the area of the rectangle is 24, then we can look at the third solution Aditya provided and find that the two triangles add up to 24 also, so the area of PCQD is 24 which is actually just a rhombus and not a square.
Does this logic make sense and can somebody else through in their two cents to make sure I'm not missing some bigger point here?
Thanks!