Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 22:47 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 22:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
targetbusiness
Joined: 06 Mar 2017
Last visit: 24 Feb 2021
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
414
 [39]
Given Kudos: 330
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Posts: 177
Kudos: 414
 [39]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
US09
Joined: 15 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Apr 2021
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
313
 [4]
Given Kudos: 338
GMAT 1: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 2: 570 Q43 V27
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 242
Kudos: 313
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
3,905
 [4]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,905
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
targetbusiness
Joined: 06 Mar 2017
Last visit: 24 Feb 2021
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 330
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Posts: 177
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
siddreal
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Possibly, therefore, the herb's high histidine production is what allows it to grow in metal-rich soils, a hypothesis that would gain support if ______.


A. histidine is found in all parts of the plant-roots, stem, leaves, and flowers

B. the herb's high level of histidine production is found to be associated with an unusually low level of production of other amino acids

C. others of the closely related group of plants are also found to produce histidine in large quantities

D. cultivation of the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over an extended period, make the soil suitable for plants to which the metals are toxic

E. the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity
This is a CAUSAL argument.
In a causal argument, A and B are observed together, and the CR concludes that A CAUSES B.

Premise = A and B are observed together:
A cultivated herb produces histidine and is able to grow in metal rich soils.
Conclusion = A causes B:
Histidine CAUSES the herb to be able to grow in metal rich soils.

One way to strengthen the conclusion that A causes B is give ANOTHER SUPPORTING EXAMPLE that links A to B.
C: others of the closely related group of plants are also found to produce histidine in large quantities.
Here, other plants in the closely related group THAT THRIVE IN SOIL WITH HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF METALS also produce HISTIDINE, STRENGTHENING the conclusion that histidine CAUSES a plant to be able to grow in metal-rich soils.


The posted OA is incorrect.
The OA to the CR above is virtually the same as the OA to CR644 in the OG18:

Quote:
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test‐tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Hence, the herb’s high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal‐rich soils.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?

A) Whether the herb can thrive in soil that does not have high concentrations of the toxic metals
B) Whether others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities
Whether the herb’s high level of histidine production is associated with an unusually low level of production
C) of some other amino acid
D) Whether growing the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over time, reduce their concentrations in the soil
E) Whether the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity”

The OA to CR644 is:

I agree with your answer. In fact, that is the answer I had in mind.
But when I saw the solution to the question, it was not at all convincing. I tried to search it on all gmat platforms, but did not find the exact question posted anywhere (though similar ones are there). Did not even have a OA for same. Later Bunuel added the OA which was in line with the solution provided by the first respond received here urvashis09. I believe that the herb renders the metals inert in the vicinity of the plant, the herb may not make the complete soil in the area suitable for growth of other plants.
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,905
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
siddreal
I agree with your answer. In fact, that is the answer I had in mind.
But when I saw the solution to the question, it was not at all convincing. I tried to search it on all gmat platforms, but did not find the exact question posted anywhere (though similar ones are there). Did not even have a OA for same. Later Bunuel added the OA which was in line with the solution provided by the first respond received here urvashis09. I believe that the herb renders the metals inert in the vicinity of the plant, the herb may not make the complete soil in the area suitable for growth of other plants.
To what solution does the phrase in red refer?
Regardless, the only opinion that truly matters is GMAC's.
Given the OA to CR644 in the OG18, the OA to the CR above must be C.

D: Cultivation of the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over an extended period, make the soil suitable for plants to which the metals are toxic.
Here, it is unclear HOW cultivation of the herb makes the soil suitable for other plants.
The soil could become suitable for any number of reasons.
To strengthen the conclusion, the correct answer must connect a high production of HISTIDINE to the ability to grow in metal-rich soil.
Only C accomplishes this goal.
Eliminate D.
avatar
mlo0703
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Last visit: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Possibly, therefore, the herb's high histidine production is what allows it to grow in metal-rich soils, a hypothesis that would gain support if ______.

The passage mentions that the specific herb they are speaking of is part of a closely related group, therefore if "others of the closely related group of plants are also found to produce histidine in large quantities" you can logically complete the stated hypothesis

C is the answer
avatar
prgmatbiz
Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Last visit: 15 Jun 2020
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 400
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V33
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V33
Posts: 18
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
siddreal
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test-tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Possibly, therefore, the herb's high histidine production is what allows it to grow in metal-rich soils, a hypothesis that would gain support if ______.


A. histidine is found in all parts of the plant-roots, stem, leaves, and flowers

B. the herb's high level of histidine production is found to be associated with an unusually low level of production of other amino acids

C. others of the closely related group of plants are also found to produce histidine in large quantities

D. cultivation of the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over an extended period, make the soil suitable for plants to which the metals are toxic

E. the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity
This is a CAUSAL argument.
In a causal argument, A and B are observed together, and the CR concludes that A CAUSES B.

Premise = A and B are observed together:
A cultivated herb produces histidine and is able to grow in metal rich soils.
Conclusion = A causes B:
Histidine CAUSES the herb to be able to grow in metal rich soils.

One way to strengthen the conclusion that A causes B is give ANOTHER SUPPORTING EXAMPLE that links A to B.
C: others of the closely related group of plants are also found to produce histidine in large quantities.
Here, other plants in the closely related group THAT THRIVE IN SOIL WITH HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF METALS also produce HISTIDINE, STRENGTHENING the conclusion that histidine CAUSES a plant to be able to grow in metal-rich soils.


The posted OA is incorrect.
The OA to the CR above is virtually the same as the OA to CR644 in the OG18:

Quote:
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals that are toxic to most other plants. Agronomists studying the growth of this herb have discovered that it produces large amounts of histidine, an amino acid that, in test‐tube solutions, renders these metals chemically inert. Hence, the herb’s high histidine production must be the key feature that allows it to grow in metal‐rich soils.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?

A) Whether the herb can thrive in soil that does not have high concentrations of the toxic metals
B) Whether others of the closely related group of plants also produce histidine in large quantities
C) Whether the herb’s high level of histidine production is associated with an unusually low level of production of some other amino acid
D) Whether growing the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over time, reduce their concentrations in the soil
E) Whether the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity”

The OA to CR644 is:

Great explanation. So if the question had asked for "lose support" instead of "gain support", then we should be looking for an example that does NOT link A to B?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,472
Own Kudos:
5,640
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,472
Kudos: 5,640
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prgmatbiz
So if the question had asked for "lose support" instead of "gain support", then we should be looking for an example that does NOT link A to B?
Something that would cause the hypothesis to lose support would have to somehow indicate that A (high histidine production) does not cause B (the plant's thriving in the soil with high concentrations of the metals).

An example that simply does not link A to B wouldn't necessarily reduce the support for the hypothesis. What would cause the hypothesis to lose support is an example that indicates that the link does not exist.

For instance, a choice that says, "NONE of the others of the closely related group of plants are found to produce histidine in large quantities," would cast doubt on the hypothesis by showing that B, the effect, exists even when A, the supposed cause, high histidine production, is not present.

Of course, information indicating that the effect is present when the supposed cause is not would make us wonder whether the supposed cause really does cause the effect.
User avatar
nayas96
Joined: 26 Jan 2021
Last visit: 24 Apr 2022
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 42
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My reasoning for answer choice (D) to be wrong, even though i selected it, is because it mentions that that particular soil post growing the certain herb would be suitable for the toxic plant to grow, which would be wrong because we tend to assume here that just by rendering the chemicals inert in the soil the plant does not become suitable for growth in that particular soil (this is neither given in the passage, its something that we assume)
Would answer choice (D) be correct if it mentioned that
cultivation of the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over an extended period, reduce or nullify the toxicity of the soil.

Kindly please clarify MartyTargetTestPrep egmat Sajjad1994
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,472
Own Kudos:
5,640
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,472
Kudos: 5,640
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nayas96
My reasoning for answer choice (D) to be wrong, even though i selected it, is because it mentions that that particular soil post growing the certain herb would be suitable for the toxic plant to grow, which would be wrong because we tend to assume here that just by rendering the chemicals inert in the soil the plant does not become suitable for growth in that particular soil (this is neither given in the passage, its something that we assume)
Would answer choice (D) be correct if it mentioned that
cultivation of the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over an extended period, reduce or nullify the toxicity of the soil.

Kindly please clarify MartyTargetTestPrep egmat Sajjad1994
The conclusion of the argument is not about the effect the herb has on the soil. It's that the herb USES HISTIDINE to thrive in the toxic soil.

So, information regarding the effect of the herb on the soil has no effect one way or another on the support for the conclusion.

In other words, the fact that the herb make the soil less toxic does not indicate how the herb thrives in toxic soil and does not indicate that histidine is what enables the herb to thrive in toxic soil.

So, neither choice (D) nor your version of choice (D) strengthens the argument.
User avatar
Namangupta1997
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 142
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 142
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi AndrewN

Isn't choice C a bit incomplete ? We have to give support to the hypothesis : the herb's high histidine production is what allows it to grow in metal-rich soils. Even if the plants in consideration in option C are related and produce histidine in the same amount, nothing is mentioned on what kind of soil they are grown. The heart of the conclusion is to determine the effectiveness of histidine is metal rich soils. How is this addressed in option C? Or do we have to assume that just because a plant produces histidine, it is obvious that it would be grown in metal rich soils.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,663
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Hi AndrewN

Isn't choice C a bit incomplete ? We have to give support to the hypothesis : the herb's high histidine production is what allows it to grow in metal-rich soils. Even if the plants in consideration in option C are related and produce histidine in the same amount, nothing is mentioned on what kind of soil they are grown. The heart of the conclusion is to determine the effectiveness of histidine is metal rich soils. How is this addressed in option C? Or do we have to assume that just because a plant produces histidine, it is obvious that it would be grown in metal rich soils.
Hello, Namangupta1997. I do not think we need to go out on a limb to infer metal-rich soils in answer choice (C), in part because the final line of the passage mentions these very soils, and we have a link to the other plants in the first line of the passage:

Quote:
Possibly, therefore, the herb's high histidine production is what allows it to grow in metal-rich soils, a hypothesis that would gain support if ______.

and, from earlier,

Quote:
A certain cultivated herb is one of a group of closely related plants that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals
Putting the two together, we can say that answer choice (C) strengthens the hypothesis in the following manner:

If others of the closely related group of plants [that thrive in soil with high concentrations of metals] are also found to produce histidine in large quantities, then these herbs' high histidine production is what may allow them to grow in metal-rich soils.

The causation (from histidine production) is certainly strengthened if this whole family of herbs thrives in metal-rich soils.

Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,418
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,418
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts