aragonn
If the cost of House L increased by 20% over the same time that the cost of House M decreased by 20%, then the ratio of the new price of House M to the new price of House L is what percent of the original cost of House M ?
(1) If House L had increased by 30%, then the increased price of House L would have been equal to the original price of House M.
(2) The price of House L is $300,000.
The only explanation that I can come up with this:
Question: Ratio/Original Price * 100 %
Lets consider
L(O)=Original price of house L
L(N)=New price of house L
M(O)=Original price of house M
M(N)=New price of house M
Given in the Q-stem,
\(L(N)=1.2*L(O)\)
\(M(N) = 0.8* M(O)\)
Now we have to find,
\(((\frac{M(N)}{L(N)})/M(O))*100\).......................(i)
Now let's consider the given statements,
St.1 : If House L had increased by 30%, then the increased price of House L would have been equal to the original price of House M.=> \(1.3* L(O) = M(O)\)
=> \(L(O)= \frac{M(O)}{1.3}\).............(ii)
Now from the Q-stem,
\(L(N)=1.2*L(O)\)
=> \(L(N)= 1.2 * \frac{M(O)}{1.3}\) .............from (ii)
Also from the Q-stem, we have \(M(N) = 0.8* M(O)\)
So putting these values in (i),
\(\frac{(0.8* M(O))}{(1.2 *M(O)/1.3)}/M(O))*100\)
=> \((\frac{0.8*1.3}{1.2}/M(O))*100\)
Now as M(O) is unknown to us, this statement is insufficient.
St.2: The price of House L is $300,000=> \(L(O)=$300,000\)
From Q-stem, we have
\(L(N)=1.2*L(O)\)
=>\(L(N)=360,000\)
and
\(M(N) = 0.8* M(O)\)
So putting these values in (i),
\(((\frac{M(N)}{L(N)})/M(O))*100\)
=> \((\frac{(0.8*M(O)}{360,000})/M(O))*100\)
=> \(\frac{(0.8*100)}{360,000}\)
Hence we do have a value for the required question and thus statement 2 is sufficient.