Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 12:47 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 12:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rocketmandoman
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 09 Nov 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
30
 [4]
Given Kudos: 799
Posts: 13
Kudos: 30
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Abhi077
User avatar
SC Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,084
Own Kudos:
2,435
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,665
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.97
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Posts: 1,084
Kudos: 2,435
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sumi747
Joined: 17 May 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
Posts: 120
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rocketmandoman
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 09 Nov 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Posts: 13
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation: If the perimeter of the window is 28 feet, 2l + 2w = 28, or
l + w = 14.
Statement (1) is insufficient. Since l + w = 14 and the two dimensions are
2 apart, l and w must be 6 and 8. However, we don’t know which is which.
Statement (2) is sufficient. Here, we’re given a relationship between the two
dimensions and we know which is which. If l = w +1/3w, we can solve:
l + w = 14
4/3w + w = 14

7/3w = 14
w = 14( 3/7) = 6
l = 8
Choice (B) is correct.

even i am not convinced with this reasoning,hence i have posted the question here.
avatar
DClifelonglearner
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sarat0994
Explanation: If the perimeter of the window is 28 feet, 2l + 2w = 28, or
l + w = 14.
Statement (1) is insufficient. Since l + w = 14 and the two dimensions are
2 apart, l and w must be 6 and 8. However, we don’t know which is which.
Statement (2) is sufficient. Here, we’re given a relationship between the two
dimensions and we know which is which. If l = w +1/3w, we can solve:
l + w = 14
4/3w + w = 14

7/3w = 14
w = 14( 3/7) = 6
l = 8
Choice (B) is correct.

even i am not convinced with this reasoning,hence i have posted the question here.

IMO this reasoning is correct. The length and the width can take any value among 6 and 8. So option A is insufficient.
With information given in option B we can find out the values of the length and the width. So option B is sufficient.

Hit kudos if you like my post.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Abhi077
User avatar
SC Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,084
Own Kudos:
2,435
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,665
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.97
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Posts: 1,084
Kudos: 2,435
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If in the statement one it's mentioned that L - W = 2, isn't that obvious that L is bigger than W? ( even if it were not, L has to be bigger than W for it to be a rectangle as length of a rectangle is the longest side whether it is vertical or horizontal
So L= 8 & W= 6 Hence statement one is ALSO sufficient
Bunuel please correct me if i'm wrong
avatar
ritika9809
Joined: 06 Dec 2018
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 7
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer should be (D) as
St 1 says L-W=2, L=2+W from which we can easily calculate the length.
St 2 gives the same answers.
So the OA should be D.
User avatar
gmexamtaker1
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 208
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 261
Products:
Posts: 208
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATBusters,

Hello GMATBusters, I was wondering if you could assist me on this problem, I have an issue with statment A, it says that "The difference between the length and width is 2 feet." so I assumed that it means L-W=2 but the OA claims that we cannot deduce which one is bigger L or W, however I believe that if that was the case the statement would state that the distance between L and W (or something like that) is 2 so that it would be
|L-w|=2 and then it would really ensure that we can't assume which one is bigger.
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,922
Own Kudos:
6,856
 [1]
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,922
Kudos: 6,856
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The “difference" between two numbers refers to the distance on a number line. So, it is always positive.
What is the result when you subtract 3 from 5? here it 5-3 =2.
What is the result when you subtract 5 from 3? here it is 3-5 =-2
What is the difference between 3 and 5? it is |3-5| = |5-3|= 2.

UNSTOPPABLE12
GMATBusters,

Hello GMATBusters, I was wondering if you could assist me on this problem, I have an issue with statment A, it says that "The difference between the length and width is 2 feet." so I assumed that it means L-W=2 but the OA claims that we cannot deduce which one is bigger L or W, however I believe that if that was the case the statement would state that the distance between L and W (or something like that) is 2 so that it would be
|L-w|=2 and then it would really ensure that we can't assume which one is bigger.
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,922
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,922
Kudos: 6,856
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Length can be shorter than breadth.it depends on us which side we choose as length and which side as the breadth.

Width is the dimension sideways. Length is usually along the sight of our eyes.

Width can be smaller than the length or bigger than the length.

Abhi077
If in the statement one it's mentioned that L - W = 2, isn't that obvious that L is bigger than W? ( even if it were not, L has to be bigger than W for it to be a rectangle as length of a rectangle is the longest side whether it is vertical or horizontal
So L= 8 & W= 6 Hence statement one is ALSO sufficient
Bunuel please correct me if i'm wrong
avatar
UJJWALGULHANI
Joined: 17 Nov 2019
Last visit: 22 Apr 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Status:Chemical Engineer
WE:Project Management (Manufacturing)
Posts: 3
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is not mentioned in the st. that whether the length or width is greater & Since the difference between length & Width should be positive so we have to use the following equation by taking the mod of the difference:-
/L-B/ = 2 i.e
Case 1 :- L-B = +2
Case 2 :- L+B = -2
Given :- Perimeter is 2(L+B) = 28

By solving above equations will get L= 6,8
W=6,8

Therefore , no unique value Hence st. is insufficient

Statement (2) is sufficient. Here, we’re given a relationship between the two
dimensions and we know which is which. If l = w +1/3w, we can solve:
l + w = 14
4/3w + w = 14

7/3w = 14
w = 14( 3/7) = 6
l = 8
Choice (B) is correct.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109820 posts
498 posts
212 posts