Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Please have a look at Bunuel's solution for details. I have 2 specific question:
1. when 2x^2+9<9x is solved it comes to (2x-3)(x-3)<0 Implies (please poke a hole in my either or logic as the solution provided is confusing me a bit currently either x-3 <0 implies x< 3 or 2x - 3 < 0 implies x< 3/2
Now if the above is drawn on a number line the values of X would look like
-5-4-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Left of +3 or Left of 3/2
In essence implies X (integer) could be lie anywhere left of 3 ? Rather than X lies between 1.5 and 3 leading to the solution of 2 and thus sufficient? thats 2x-3 > 0 - HRS vs LHS makes a difference? Happy to listen to alternative suggestions
2. |x+10|=2x+8
For the above situations there could be 2 situations either of = or > < Bunuels solution by logic that the LHS is always positive and thus solve RHS first sounds a bit unintuitive in an algebraic equation. Generally speaking algebraic solutions are supposed to be solved together ? to keep all sides positive we could square both sides and then solve or alternatively do the +ve and -ve for x+10 and solve?
But first solving HRS and then replacing that solution - should this be the way if a combination of equality and equation comes across? What if
|x+10| = |2x+8|
What should be done then or
|x+10| > 2x+8 or equivalent?
Please suggest
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.