Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 06:14 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 06:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,865
 [10]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,865
 [10]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sonalgmat123
Joined: 04 Feb 2020
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
24
 [5]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 54
Kudos: 24
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sushil117
Joined: 04 Mar 2020
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
297
 [1]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: India
GPA: 3.3
Posts: 248
Kudos: 297
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
winterschool
User avatar
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Last visit: 13 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,891
Own Kudos:
1,664
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,681
Posts: 1,891
Kudos: 1,664
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A proposed law would prohibit any individual who has been employed as a lobbyist on behalf of a particular industry from serving as the director of a government agency charged with regulating that same industry. The purpose of the proposed law is to prevent conflicts of interest. However, if passed, the law would prove counterproductive because it would prevent individuals who are knowledgeable about industries from serving as government regulators.

The argument above depends most directly on which of the following assumptions?

(A) The individuals in government that hold the power to enact the proposed law are susceptible to influence on the part of industry lobbyists. Incorrect

(B) Government has a legitimate role to play in the regulation of most industries. Irrelevant

(C) Only individuals who have served as lobbyists on behalf of an industry are knowledgeable about that industry. Correct

it supports argument conclusion, if only lobbyists are knowledgeable and they cant serve as the director of a government agency in that industry then the law should be counterproductive

(D) Those who have served as lobbyists on behalf of an industry are capable of objective, unbiased decisions as regulators. Incorrect

it supports conclusion

(E) The primary objective of government regulation of industry should be to strengthen and support that industry Irrelevant
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,865
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,865
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

The argument’s conclusion, stated in the passage’s final sentence, is true only if it is also true that the government has no other choice but to turn to former industry lobbyists if it wants to find knowledgeable regulators. (This is the assumption that choice (C) provides.) If such people are available elsewhere—for example, among university professors—then the conclusion is faulty.

The correct answer is (C).
User avatar
JuniqueLid
Joined: 04 Feb 2025
Last visit: 18 Jan 2026
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 687
Posts: 51
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Think the OA (C) is flawed.
(C) is too extreme and not necessary for the argument. Even if other people are knowledgeable (i.e. negation of the statement), removing former lobbyists from the pool still reduces the number of knowledgeable candidates, which could make regulation less effective. The argument can hold without assuming exclusivity — it only needs to assume that former lobbyists are a valuable part of the talent pool.
(D) is a better assumption. Because if former lobbyists are biased, then excluding them isn't necessarily counterproductive. In other words, if they’re inherently biased, then losing their expertise might be a worthwhile trade-off for protecting the integrity of regulation.
Experts please help clarify. Bunuel
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts