Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Updated on: 23 Sep 2020, 15:01
Originally posted by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 21 Sep 2020, 14:45.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 23 Sep 2020, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 23 Sep 2020, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
79% (01:26) correct
21%
(01:35)
wrong
based on 256
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Pack 20, Question 1 of 5:
Although concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating minorities, they did not provide details on the number of officers involved.
A. concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
B. concessions by police department officials that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
C. police department officials have conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force, as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate
D. police department officials conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language to intimidate
E. police department officials, conceding incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
◀ Pack 19, Question 5
▶ Pack 20, Question 2
⏏ Question Pack Home
48 Hour Window To Win An $85 EMPOWERgmat Tuition Credit (1 Month Free!)
Share your explanation! The GMAT Club member with the most verified Kudos in total on the 5 question SC Block 20 question pack will win an $85 EMPOWERgmat tuition credit, which will entitle the winner to a full month of complete access to the EMPOWERgmat system. Even if you're not sure about your answer or your rationale, share your explanation to help boost your learning and earn a chance to win.
To be eligible, your explanation must:
The OA and official explanation will be held until the 48 hour window has lapsed.
Although concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating minorities, they did not provide details on the number of officers involved.
A. concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
B. concessions by police department officials that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
C. police department officials have conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force, as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate
D. police department officials conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language to intimidate
E. police department officials, conceding incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
◀ Pack 19, Question 5
▶ Pack 20, Question 2
⏏ Question Pack Home
48 Hour Window To Win An $85 EMPOWERgmat Tuition Credit (1 Month Free!)
Share your explanation! The GMAT Club member with the most verified Kudos in total on the 5 question SC Block 20 question pack will win an $85 EMPOWERgmat tuition credit, which will entitle the winner to a full month of complete access to the EMPOWERgmat system. Even if you're not sure about your answer or your rationale, share your explanation to help boost your learning and earn a chance to win.
To be eligible, your explanation must:
- be submitted within the 48 hour window after this post was created
should explain your reasoning why the answer you chose is correct, and why the other 4 options are incorrect within 48 hours of this post
The OA and official explanation will be held until the 48 hour window has lapsed.
21 Sep 2020, 19:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
Although concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating minorities, they did not provide details on the number of officers involved.
A. concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
Concessions: Plural Subject
Was made: Singular Verb.....It should be were
It should be in Active Voice
B. concessions by police department officials that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
Had been: Past Perfect tense which is use to show sequence of event. Therefore, simple past is use with conjunction. But there is no Simple past in the sentence. Hence, this option is wrong
Should use Active voice
C. police department officials have conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force, as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate
Have conceded: Present Perfect
Had been: Past Perfect
The sentence should be in past, therefore present perfect is wrong here. Simple past required
D. police department officials conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language to intimidate
Correct Usage of conceded: Simple past and Had been: Past Perfect
E. police department officials, conceding incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
Police Department officials: Subject, No Verb: Therefore this sentence is a fragment. Wrong
A. concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
Concessions: Plural Subject
Was made: Singular Verb.....It should be were
It should be in Active Voice
B. concessions by police department officials that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
Had been: Past Perfect tense which is use to show sequence of event. Therefore, simple past is use with conjunction. But there is no Simple past in the sentence. Hence, this option is wrong
Should use Active voice
C. police department officials have conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force, as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate
Have conceded: Present Perfect
Had been: Past Perfect
The sentence should be in past, therefore present perfect is wrong here. Simple past required
D. police department officials conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language to intimidate
Correct Usage of conceded: Simple past and Had been: Past Perfect
E. police department officials, conceding incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating
Police Department officials: Subject, No Verb: Therefore this sentence is a fragment. Wrong
21 Sep 2020, 22:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
Although concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating minorities, they did not provide details on the number of officers involved.
A. concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating -----（X）Subject-Verb agreement; "they" refers to concessions
B. concessions by police department officials that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating -----（X）There is no verb in the subordinate clause;"they" refers to concessions
C. police department officials have conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force, as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate -------（X）It's confusing to use present prefect tense here; ", as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate minorities," changes the meaning.
D. police department officials conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language to intimidate ----（O）"they" refers to police department officials; concise verb tense;
E. police department officials, conceding incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating------- （X）There is no verb in the subordinate clause
A. concessions by police department officials was made of incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating -----（X）Subject-Verb agreement; "they" refers to concessions
B. concessions by police department officials that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating -----（X）There is no verb in the subordinate clause;"they" refers to concessions
C. police department officials have conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force, as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate -------（X）It's confusing to use present prefect tense here; ", as well as use of derogatory language to intimidate minorities," changes the meaning.
D. police department officials conceded that there had been incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language to intimidate ----（O）"they" refers to police department officials; concise verb tense;
E. police department officials, conceding incidents involving excessive force and use of derogatory language in intimidating------- （X）There is no verb in the subordinate clause
