Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 08:32 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 08:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,814
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,871
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,814
Kudos: 811,022
 [20]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
MaryKaaviya
Joined: 29 Apr 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2021
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22
Schools: ISB'22
Posts: 17
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
santosh93
Joined: 07 Jul 2020
Last visit: 19 May 2022
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
39
 [2]
Given Kudos: 340
Location: India
GRE 1: Q169 V152
GPA: 3.94
WE:Research (Manufacturing)
GRE 1: Q169 V152
Posts: 47
Kudos: 39
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,223
Own Kudos:
1,138
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,223
Kudos: 1,138
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi santosh93 ,

This is a common mistake. This exact expression is a bit special but in general, when you see variables in inequalities we have to be cautious. Here what you did was "multiply both sides by (a - b) then (b - a)" but we don't know if these two terms are positive or negative. We wouldn't know if the inequality should result in ">" or "<", thus we wouldn't be allowed to "move" these terms without knowing the signs.

However, we do know (a - b) and (b - a) have OPPOSITE signs so no matter what the result is \(b - a < a - b\) for this expression and we get \(b < a\) (this is still insufficient alone).

Hope that helps!
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,223
Own Kudos:
1,138
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,223
Kudos: 1,138
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is |a| > |b|?

(1) 1/(a − b) > 1/(b − a)

(2) a + b < 0

Statement 1:

Normally we are not allowed to move variables around in an inequality using multiplication/division but \(a - b\) and \(b - a\) have opposite signs so no matter what this simplifies to \(b - a < a - b\) and \(b < a\). This is still insufficient as we can have \(-5 < 3\) vs \(-1 < 3\).

Statement 2:

(a, b) = (3, -5) vs (a, b) = (-3, -1). Insufficient.

Combined:

We may write statement 2 as \(a < -b\). Combining \(b < a\) from statement 1 we have \(b < a < -b\) which means b must be negative. Since \(a\) is between both b's, \(a\)'s magnitude must be less than that of b, which we can translate to \(|a| < |b|\). Sufficient.

Ans: C
User avatar
imaityaroy
Joined: 18 Nov 2020
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 19
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My 2 cents:
a != b because if they are equal then the inequality will become infinite (1 divided by 0 = infinite) which is not a valid solution in gmat

If a and b are not same then a-b and b-a will have opposite signs (try #'s if you doubt this statement)

S(1) -> Given 1/(a-b)> 1/(b-a) we know LHS will be positive and RHS will be negative ...but this does not ensure |a|>|b|... all we can take away from this statement is that a is greater than b
so 2 cases -> a = 1 and b = -10 .....then |a|<|b|.
a = 10 and and b = -1 ...then |a|>|b|.
hence insufficient

S(2) -> a+b<0 .... a <-b
so 2 cases -> a = -1 and -b = 10 .....then |a|<|b|.
a = -10 and -b = 1...then |a|>|b|.

combining statement 1 and 2

b<a<-b

a is between b and a on the numberline hence |a|<|b|

thus c is sufficient
Moderators:
Math Expert
109814 posts
498 posts
212 posts