Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
75%
(00:13)
correct 25%
(00:10)
wrong
based on 27
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A highly sought after miniature Mogul painting in the local museum in Shahajanabad has just been shown, by using X-rays, to be recent, and not from the 16th century as previously thought. This has caused its value to drop from lacs to almost nothing, almost overnight. Curiously, when showed to multiple art experts, none of them were able to detect that it was not 'the real thing'. Doesn't this mean that the value of a painting is determined by who painted it rather than any intrinsic artistic merit? Which of the following, if true, would make the argument strong?
A)The works of some forgers of art now sell for very large amounts of money B)Many old masters changed their style during their career C)In controlled tests, art experts have been shown to be very good at identifying the painters works they have not seen before D)Until its true origin was discovered, the painting in the museum was widely regarded as a masterpiece E)The works of the old masters attract higher prices than modern paintings
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.