Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 06:27 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 06:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,813
Own Kudos:
810,988
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,870
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,813
Kudos: 810,988
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
errorlogger
Joined: 01 Nov 2020
Last visit: 31 Jan 2022
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Posts: 81
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
shalin23
Joined: 27 Aug 2021
Last visit: 21 Jan 2022
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,331
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,331
Kudos: 772
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1 is not sufficient because of the triangle inequality theorem which states: the sum of any 2 sides of a triangle must always be greater than the 3rd side.

We know one side is 6.

S1: we are given the other side as 3

There are 2 possibilities for an isosceles triangle, in which 2 of the side lengths are equal:

Case 1: 3 - 3 - 6

However, this does not form a valid triangle

3 + 3 = 6

Therefore, it must be that the 3rd unknown side is equal to = 6

Case 2: 6 - 6 - 3

Perimeter = 15 - unique value so S1 is Sufficient alone.

S2: we are told that the other side PR < 4

And we are given that the side must be integers

If we allow the 2 equal sides to be 6 and 6, then PR would be the non equal side.

PR in this scenario can take the following integer values: 1, 2, or 3

6 - 6 - 3

3 + 6 > 6 ——-> valid triangle


6 - 6 - 2

2 + 6 > 6 ———> valid triangle


As this two cases provides us with valid isosceles triangles within the constraints of statement 2 and the question stem, we can stop here.

The perimeter can vary and we do not get a unique answer. S2 is not sufficient


A - s1 alone is sufficient


shalin23
Can someone tell the answer?

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Shreyaskn
Joined: 04 Jan 2020
Last visit: 14 Jul 2022
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Posts: 11
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1 is correct because, if QR is three then other unknown side must be less than 9 and greater than 3. Therefore PR will be 6 as triangle is isosceles..
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,972
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,972
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109813 posts
498 posts
212 posts