Statement 1 is not sufficient because of the triangle inequality theorem which states: the sum of any 2 sides of a triangle must always be greater than the 3rd side.
We know one side is 6.
S1: we are given the other side as 3
There are 2 possibilities for an isosceles triangle, in which 2 of the side lengths are equal:
Case 1: 3 - 3 - 6
However, this does not form a valid triangle
3 + 3 = 6
Therefore, it must be that the 3rd unknown side is equal to = 6
Case 2: 6 - 6 - 3
Perimeter = 15 - unique value so S1 is Sufficient alone.
S2: we are told that the other side PR < 4
And we are given that the side must be integers
If we allow the 2 equal sides to be 6 and 6, then PR would be the non equal side.
PR in this scenario can take the following integer values: 1, 2, or 3
6 - 6 - 3
3 + 6 > 6 ——-> valid triangle
6 - 6 - 2
2 + 6 > 6 ———> valid triangle
As this two cases provides us with valid isosceles triangles within the constraints of statement 2 and the question stem, we can stop here.
The perimeter can vary and we do not get a unique answer. S2 is not sufficient
A - s1 alone is sufficient
shalin23
Can someone tell the answer?
Posted from my mobile device