Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 05:53 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 05:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,865
 [6]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,865
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Ghostrider3147
Joined: 21 Jun 2021
Last visit: 08 Oct 2022
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 209
GPA: 2.91
Posts: 82
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,865
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,865
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Last visit: 21 Nov 2022
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
54
 [4]
Given Kudos: 259
Posts: 146
Kudos: 54
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ghostrider3147
Sajjad1994 pls explain Q3??

Posted from my mobile device

The author mentions in the passage that the proponents of deregulation were supporting the equilibrium theory thus it is clear that they didn't consider economic regulation as a necessary option. ''Catastrophic'' is an extraordinarily strong word, there is no indication in the passage to employ such a strong word, passage only states that proponents of deregulation ''insist'' on removing the regulations. The word ''ínsist'' doesn't permit us to equate it with ''catastrophic''.
''Insufficient'' is again nowhere indicated in the passage, as it would mean regulation is acceptable, but it requires something more to it. However, the proponents of deregulation clearly insisted on removing the regulations altogether. Thus, the only safe bet is ''unnecessary''. Other two options such as salutary is completely opposite to the passage's line of thought.

Thank You
Vighnesh
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,400
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,400
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts