Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 01:57 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 01:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
 [153]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
147
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Paras96
Joined: 11 Sep 2022
Last visit: 30 Dec 2023
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
337
 [46]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Paras: Bhawsar
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 580 Q49 V21
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE:Project Management (Other)
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 456
Kudos: 337
 [46]
28
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
 [14]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
AryaSwagat
Joined: 08 Nov 2021
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
114
 [8]
Given Kudos: 105
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 8.7
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Posts: 81
Kudos: 114
 [8]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer = Highest Common Factor of 24 and 36 = 12

Let M= 24 a = (2^3 * 3 ) a
and N= 36 b= (2^2*3^2) b
So M+N= 24 a+36 b = (2^3* 3)a+ (2^2*3^2) b = 2^2*3 (2a+3b)= 12 (2a+3b)

Answer 12
A
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
11,438
 [7]
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,438
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72

\(M = 24x\)

\(N = 36y\)

\(M + N = 24x + 36y\)

\(= 12*(2x + 3y)\)

2x + 3y can either be odd or it can be even. Hence, we cannot take out any additional factors without knowing the value of \((2x + 3y)\).

The sum however must be divisible by 12.

Option A
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,974
Own Kudos:
8,708
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,974
Kudos: 8,708
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72

Since 24 is a divisor of M, we have:

M = 24m, where m is an integer.

Since 36 is a divisor of N, we have:

N = 36n, where n is an integer.

M + N = 24m + 36n = 12(2m + 3n)

We see that 12 is definitely a divisor of M + N.

What about 2m + 3n ? Besides 1, the expression 2m + 3n is not necessarily divisible by any other positive integer.

So, the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N is 12.

Answer: A
User avatar
gautham83
Joined: 29 Jan 2024
Last visit: 12 Mar 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 3
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why can't 'm' and 'n' be 1? 28 can be a divisor of 28 and 36 can be a divisor of 36. So the answer would be '60'?
Gmatguy007
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Own Kudos:
0
 [1]
Kudos: 0
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

gautham83
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72

Why can't 'm' and 'n' be 1? 28 can be a divisor of 28 and 36 can be a divisor of 36. So the answer would be '60'?
­

So, you are basically asking why M and N cannot be 24 and 36, respectively. Notice that the question asks "what is the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N?" NOT "COULD be a divisor of M + N?". While any number COULD be a divisor of M + N, only 12 is ALWAYS a divisor of M + N, regardless of what they are (provided 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N). For example, if M and N are 48 and 36, respectively, then among the options only 12 is a factor of M + N = 84.­
­

So, since we're given the divisors of M,N and we're asked about the max possible divisor of M+N (unconditionally) then we're just looking for the greatest common factor of 24,36?
And similarly if we wanted to find the minimum integer that must be a divisor of the sum we would looking for the least common factor?
Finally, -if my reasoning above is correct- would it be true for every arithmetic operation or just for the sum?­
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gmatguy007

Bunuel

gautham83
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72

Why can't 'm' and 'n' be 1? 28 can be a divisor of 28 and 36 can be a divisor of 36. So the answer would be '60'?
­

So, you are basically asking why M and N cannot be 24 and 36, respectively. Notice that the question asks "what is the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N?" NOT "COULD be a divisor of M + N?". While any number COULD be a divisor of M + N, only 12 is ALWAYS a divisor of M + N, regardless of what they are (provided 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N). For example, if M and N are 48 and 36, respectively, then among the options only 12 is a factor of M + N = 84.­
­

So, since we're given the divisors of M,N and we're asked about the max possible divisor of M+N (unconditionally) then we're just looking for the greatest common factor of 24,36?
And similarly if we wanted to find the minimum integer that must be a divisor of the sum we would looking for the least common factor?
Finally, -if my reasoning above is correct- would it be true for every arithmetic operation or just for the sum?­
­Not followiong your logic.

The question does NOT ask about the greatest integer that COULD divide M + N. ANY number could be a divisor of M + N. 

The question asks about the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N. 

P.S. Also, note that the least common positive factor of two integers is 1.
Gmatguy007
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Gmatguy007

So, since we're given the divisors of M,N and we're asked about the max possible divisor of M+N (unconditionally) then we're just looking for the greatest common factor of 24,36?
And similarly if we wanted to find the minimum integer that must be a divisor of the sum we would looking for the least common factor?
Finally, -if my reasoning above is correct- would it be true for every arithmetic operation or just for the sum?­
­Not followiong your logic.

The question does NOT ask about the greatest integer that COULD divide M + N. ANY number could be a divisor of M + N. 

The question asks about the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N. 

P.S. Also, note that the least common positive factor of two integers is 1.
I know that we're looking for the maximum integer that must be a divisor, that's why I added in parenthesis the unconditionally . What I'm saying is that we're given divisors of each one seperately and we want to find the greatest one of the sum that MUST be a divisor. Which lead me to the question if that means that we're looking for the greatest integer of both divisors that, no matter what is a divisor of the sum.

Then, I expanded my query to whether is the same logic for the minimum integer (if it had been asked) and also if the methodology can be used in any other arithmetic operation or is just for the sum.

Lastly, of course I would excluded the 1 if my reasoning is correct since as you said is the same for every integers.­
User avatar
GMATkid1997
Joined: 10 May 2018
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
42
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 44
Kudos: 42
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is there any difference between these 2 questions?

GCF of (N + M)
GCF of (N , M)

They look the same, and appear to yield the same result, but I want to make sure I am 100% correct

Thanks in advance!

Bunuel
User avatar
DanTheGMATMan
Joined: 02 Oct 2015
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 380
Own Kudos:
267
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 380
Kudos: 267
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Find the greatest common factor of M and N, and M + N must be a multiple of that:

User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATkid1997
Is there any difference between these 2 questions?

GCF of (N + M)
GCF of (N , M)

They look the same, and appear to yield the same result, but I want to make sure I am 100% correct

Thanks in advance!

Bunuel

GCF stands for Greatest Common Factor, and it applies to two or more integers. For example, the GCF of 12, 16, and 20 is 4. The term GCF cannot be applied to a single number, so asking for the GCF of (N + M) doesn’t make sense. The question is actually about the greatest factor that the sum (N + M) must have.
User avatar
Gambrosio
Joined: 23 Apr 2024
Last visit: 05 Jan 2026
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 12
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72
Prime factors:

M = 24k = 2^3x3^1*k
N = 36k = 2^2x3^2*k

greatest divisor: take the lowest powers of the common prime factors

2^2x3^1 = 12

Hence A
User avatar
maingi95
Joined: 04 Nov 2024
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q81 V83 DI80
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q81 V83 DI80
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

gautham83
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72

Why can't 'm' and 'n' be 1? 28 can be a divisor of 28 and 36 can be a divisor of 36. So the answer would be '60'?
­

So, you are basically asking why M and N cannot be 24 and 36, respectively. Notice that the question asks "what is the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N?" NOT "COULD be a divisor of M + N?". While any number COULD be a divisor of M + N, only 12 is ALWAYS a divisor of M + N, regardless of what they are (provided 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N). For example, if M and N are 48 and 36, respectively, then among the options only 12 is a factor of M + N = 84.­
Why are the words 'divisor' and 'factor' used interchangeably? I noticed in other questions as well. When dividing a dividend, the divisor can yield a remainder, whereas in the case of a factor, the remainder must be zero. So in this case M can be 30 as well with divisor 24 and remainder 6, so by that logic all the options can be divisors of M + N. Let me know where is my understanding wrong?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maingi95
Bunuel

gautham83
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72

Why can't 'm' and 'n' be 1? 28 can be a divisor of 28 and 36 can be a divisor of 36. So the answer would be '60'?
­

So, you are basically asking why M and N cannot be 24 and 36, respectively. Notice that the question asks "what is the greatest integer that MUST be a divisor of M + N?" NOT "COULD be a divisor of M + N?". While any number COULD be a divisor of M + N, only 12 is ALWAYS a divisor of M + N, regardless of what they are (provided 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N). For example, if M and N are 48 and 36, respectively, then among the options only 12 is a factor of M + N = 84.­
Why are the words 'divisor' and 'factor' used interchangeably? I noticed in other questions as well. When dividing a dividend, the divisor can yield a remainder, whereas in the case of a factor, the remainder must be zero. So in this case M can be 30 as well with divisor 24 and remainder 6, so by that logic all the options can be divisors of M + N. Let me know where is my understanding wrong?

In this case, divisor = factor.
User avatar
00291681
Joined: 15 Mar 2023
Last visit: 03 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This was my first approach to the problem. Does it always works? I saw that people used a more simpler approach.
Gambrosio

Prime factors:

M = 24k = 2^3x3^1*k
N = 36k = 2^2x3^2*k

greatest divisor: take the lowest powers of the common prime factors

2^2x3^1 = 12

Hence A
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 853
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
Posts: 853
Kudos: 909
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00291681
This was my first approach to the problem. Does it always works? I saw that people used a more simpler approach.

As mentioned here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/for-positive ... l#p3456397, we are asked to find a greatest number that must be a factor M + N; the approach you mentioned finds GCF of M and N, it's working here since when you add you bring out the greatest common factors, but it's worth noting the difference and having a clarity what the question asks.
User avatar
bot00078
Joined: 08 Mar 2025
Last visit: 01 Apr 2026
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT Focus 1: 345 Q70 V66 DI62
GMAT Focus 1: 345 Q70 V66 DI62
Posts: 37
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For positive integers M and N, if 24 is a divisor of M and 36 is a divisor of N, what is the greatest integer that must be a divisor of M + N?

A. 12
B. 24
C. 36
D. 60
E. 72
So,
Here in this question i done is M/24 and N/36 but the thing mention is greatest integer This one is indicate G.C.F.(Greatest Common Factor)
G.C.F. of (24,36) is 12 so the greatest integer is also 12
Moderators:
Math Expert
109715 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts