AKKAMI-
Hypothetically, if one were to apply for their masters in a year or so, with the classic GMAT having been phased out by then, what would their 780 be interpreted as? Going by the percentile chart published by GMAC earlier this month, the score could be interpreted as anything between 755 and 785 - a 30 point range.
How will adcoms interpret the score ( and rank it among other scores, the vast majority of which will be FOCUS scores ) ?
Do we expect the score conversion table to change as more data on FOCUS results is collected ( as far as I can tell, what we have now is not much more than statistical voodoo by GMAC psychometricians ) ? I know that Marty from [REDACTED*] thinks that the GMAC overestimated the difficulty of the focus, as high-scoring people will do better on DI than they did on IR as it matters more now, skewing the percentiles down on the top end.
I ( selfishly ) hope people that took the test "early" don't get screwed by the transition to the FOCUS test...
Hi AKKAMI,
1. Your 780 will continue to be seen as a very, very good score.
2. Yes, the tables could change as actual Focus Edition data become available, but any changes are likely to be minor over the course of only one year ("in a year or so").
3. As for Focus Edition difficulty, all we have right now is
speculation. This is not to say that Marty is wrong. In fact, I too think that
DI percentiles could drop. However, that's very different from saying that the Focus Edition as a whole is easier. Specifically, to be very clear, there are two big differences between DI and IR:
3a. DI has DS.
3b.
DI is question-adaptive, whereas IR is not adaptive.
I believe these points (especially 3b) could make a difference. The bottom line, as I mentioned earlier, is that every external opinion you've read on DI is most likely just speculation.