adityakaregamba
Hey can you please tell me where I am going wrong
GMATNinjacommission >= d+0.05d(16) (for at least 28 orders)
its given that d >500
so if I put d = 500
then for 28 orders min. commission has to be greater than 900 (500 + 400)
1) First statement
1.9d = 1.9*500 = 950
since 950 > 900
therefore the number orders will be greater than 28
Sufficient
2) Second statement
total commission = 1159 $
which again is greater than 900
therefore the number of orders will be greater than 28
Sufficient
where am I going wrong ?
At the very beginning of your solution, you're on the right track. Here's the original question:
And you translated it into a completely equivalent question, as shown in the video:
- Q: Is total commission ≥ 1.8d ?
So far, so good. The trouble started when you replaced d with 500, which gave you this (incorrect) version of the question:
- Q: Is total commission ≥ $900 ?
You're suggesting that if the commission was greater than $900, then the salesperson MUST have sold more than 28 items, and that simply isn't the case, since d could be MUCH greater than $500. For example, imagine what happens if d = $1000. In that scenario, the salesperson could have sold just 12 items, and still earned a commission greater than $900, right?
In other words, by replacing d with $500, you end up with a version of the question that isn't logically equivalent to the original. Yes, if at least 28 items were sold, the total commission had to be greater than $900. But the converse isn't true: if the commission is greater than $900, we still don't know whether the salesperson sold at least 28 items, since we don't know much about the value of d.
For more on why (B) isn't sufficient, check out the video explanation above.
I hope that helps a bit!