Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
19 Sep 2024, 21:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Feminist legal theory manifests through writing and speaking about ‘law’ and ‘women,’ in an effort to promote and improve understanding about justice. In its life span, it has gone through several evolutions, to produce a plural, complex, and fractured body of thought and practice. Developments in feminist legal theory have emerged through engagement with problems connected to inequalities, as experienced by individuals and communities at the hands of people, corporations, or the state. The problem-driven impetus of feminist legal theory contributes to its present-day heterogeneity.
The separation line between feminism and feminist legal theory is porous. While feminist legal theory takes law as a primary focus, the whole field of feminist studies regularly engages legal issues because the state is central to feminism's reformist agenda. Contemporary Western feminism's roots lie in nineteenth-century campaigns to abolish slavery and secure the right to vote for women and enslaved people. Although some US campaigners fought to end both slavery and women's oppression, the post-Civil War movement for women's suffrage splintered over decisions to prioritize the voting rights of white middle-class women.
As an intellectual and political enterprise, feminist legal theory has been a movement embedded in the political currents of its time. The twentieth-century's struggle between liberalism and Marxism set the stage for feminist debates about prioritizing civil equality rights over material inequalities. The contemporary rollback of the welfare state, the foregrounding of the nuclear family as the caretaker of human vulnerability, and the disproportionate impact of austerity policies on marginalized women provide the context for the critical attention among feminist legal theorists to issues such as the feminization of the global care market.
It was not until the 1970s that ‘feminist legal theory’ came to be labeled as a field. The equality stage of feminist legal theory, sometimes labeled ‘liberal feminism’ and dated to the 1970s, focused on formal inequalities between women and men and called for ending legal discrimination. By the 1980s, radical or dominance feminism and difference feminism shifted attention to the differences between women and men and the social production of inequality. Both schools of thought were criticized for single-minded attention to the concerns of class- and race-privileged women.
If feminist legal theory prioritizes civil rights over material inequality, which of the following might be considered a limitation of such a perspective, according to the passage?
A. It may overlook the structural factors that contribute to gender-based economic disparities, thus failing to address the root causes of inequality.
B. It may focus too narrowly on legal reform, leaving social and cultural forms of inequality unchallenged.
C. It may disproportionately benefit people who are already economically privileged, while marginalized those who continue to experience material deprivation.
D. It may inadvertently reinforce the dominance of capitalist systems that rely on the feminization of the global care market.
E. It may assume that once legal barriers are removed, material inequalities will naturally resolve, ignoring the persistence of systemic injustices.
The separation line between feminism and feminist legal theory is porous. While feminist legal theory takes law as a primary focus, the whole field of feminist studies regularly engages legal issues because the state is central to feminism's reformist agenda. Contemporary Western feminism's roots lie in nineteenth-century campaigns to abolish slavery and secure the right to vote for women and enslaved people. Although some US campaigners fought to end both slavery and women's oppression, the post-Civil War movement for women's suffrage splintered over decisions to prioritize the voting rights of white middle-class women.
As an intellectual and political enterprise, feminist legal theory has been a movement embedded in the political currents of its time. The twentieth-century's struggle between liberalism and Marxism set the stage for feminist debates about prioritizing civil equality rights over material inequalities. The contemporary rollback of the welfare state, the foregrounding of the nuclear family as the caretaker of human vulnerability, and the disproportionate impact of austerity policies on marginalized women provide the context for the critical attention among feminist legal theorists to issues such as the feminization of the global care market.
It was not until the 1970s that ‘feminist legal theory’ came to be labeled as a field. The equality stage of feminist legal theory, sometimes labeled ‘liberal feminism’ and dated to the 1970s, focused on formal inequalities between women and men and called for ending legal discrimination. By the 1980s, radical or dominance feminism and difference feminism shifted attention to the differences between women and men and the social production of inequality. Both schools of thought were criticized for single-minded attention to the concerns of class- and race-privileged women.
If feminist legal theory prioritizes civil rights over material inequality, which of the following might be considered a limitation of such a perspective, according to the passage?
A. It may overlook the structural factors that contribute to gender-based economic disparities, thus failing to address the root causes of inequality.
B. It may focus too narrowly on legal reform, leaving social and cultural forms of inequality unchallenged.
C. It may disproportionately benefit people who are already economically privileged, while marginalized those who continue to experience material deprivation.
D. It may inadvertently reinforce the dominance of capitalist systems that rely on the feminization of the global care market.
E. It may assume that once legal barriers are removed, material inequalities will naturally resolve, ignoring the persistence of systemic injustices.
19 Sep 2024, 21:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Feminist legal theory manifests through writing and speaking about ‘law’ and ‘women,’ in an effort to promote and improve understanding about justice. In its life span, it has gone through several evolutions, to produce a plural, complex, and fractured body of thought and practice. Developments in feminist legal theory have emerged through engagement with problems connected to inequalities, as experienced by individuals and communities at the hands of people, corporations, or the state. The problem-driven impetus of feminist legal theory contributes to its present-day heterogeneity.
The separation line between feminism and feminist legal theory is porous. While feminist legal theory takes law as a primary focus, the whole field of feminist studies regularly engages legal issues because the state is central to feminism's reformist agenda. Contemporary Western feminism's roots lie in nineteenth-century campaigns to abolish slavery and secure the right to vote for women and enslaved people. Although some US campaigners fought to end both slavery and women's oppression, the post-Civil War movement for women's suffrage splintered over decisions to prioritize the voting rights of white middle-class women.
As an intellectual and political enterprise, feminist legal theory has been a movement embedded in the political currents of its time. The twentieth-century's struggle between liberalism and Marxism set the stage for feminist debates about prioritizing civil equality rights over material inequalities. The contemporary rollback of the welfare state, the foregrounding of the nuclear family as the caretaker of human vulnerability, and the disproportionate impact of austerity policies on marginalized women provide the context for the critical attention among feminist legal theorists to issues such as the feminization of the global care market.
It was not until the 1970s that ‘feminist legal theory’ came to be labeled as a field. The equality stage of feminist legal theory, sometimes labeled ‘liberal feminism’ and dated to the 1970s, focused on formal inequalities between women and men and called for ending legal discrimination. By the 1980s, radical or dominance feminism and difference feminism shifted attention to the differences between women and men and the social production of inequality. Both schools of thought were criticized for single-minded attention to the concerns of class- and race-privileged women.
If feminist legal theory prioritizes civil rights over material inequality, which of the following might be considered a limitation of such a perspective, according to the passage?
A. It may overlook the structural factors that contribute to gender-based economic disparities, thus failing to address the root causes of inequality.
B. It may focus too narrowly on legal reform, leaving social and cultural forms of inequality unchallenged.
C. It may disproportionately benefit people who are already economically privileged, while marginalized those who continue to experience material deprivation.
D. It may inadvertently reinforce the dominance of capitalist systems that rely on the feminization of the global care market.
E. It may assume that once legal barriers are removed, material inequalities will naturally resolve, ignoring the persistence of systemic injustices.
A. Correct Answer. The question prompt asks: If feminist legal theory prioritizes civil rights over material inequality, which of the following might be considered a limitation of such a perspective, according to the passage?
Supporting evidence from the passage:
1. "The equality stage of feminist legal theory, sometimes labeled ‘liberal feminism’ and dated to the 1970s, focused on formal inequalities between women and men and called for ending legal discrimination." This quote indicates that there was a focus on civil rights and legal reforms.
2. "By the 1980s, radical or dominance feminism and difference feminism shifted attention to the differences between women and men and the social production of inequality. Both schools of thought were criticized for single-minded attention to the concerns of class- and race-privileged women."
This quote indicates a later acknowledgment within feminist legal theory that earlier approaches might have been too narrow, focusing on legalistic aspects of inequality which do not encompass broader economic and structural disparities.
B. Incorrect. This option is too broad. The passage does not focus on social or cultural inequalities but specifically on the tension between civil rights and material inequality.
C. Incorrect. This option is close but not quite correct because yes, it touches on a relevant critique, but it shifts the focus to class-based privilege and talks about people vs. specifically women, implying an impact that is too broad and outside of the scope.
D. Incorrect. This introduces a critique of capitalism and the global care market, which, though mentioned, is not central to the issue of prioritizing civil rights over material inequality.
E. Incorrect. This option introduces an assumption not supported by the passage. The passage does not imply that feminist legal theory assumes material inequalities will naturally resolve once legal barriers are removed.
Answer: A
Feminist legal theory manifests through writing and speaking about ‘law’ and ‘women,’ in an effort to promote and improve understanding about justice. In its life span, it has gone through several evolutions, to produce a plural, complex, and fractured body of thought and practice. Developments in feminist legal theory have emerged through engagement with problems connected to inequalities, as experienced by individuals and communities at the hands of people, corporations, or the state. The problem-driven impetus of feminist legal theory contributes to its present-day heterogeneity.
The separation line between feminism and feminist legal theory is porous. While feminist legal theory takes law as a primary focus, the whole field of feminist studies regularly engages legal issues because the state is central to feminism's reformist agenda. Contemporary Western feminism's roots lie in nineteenth-century campaigns to abolish slavery and secure the right to vote for women and enslaved people. Although some US campaigners fought to end both slavery and women's oppression, the post-Civil War movement for women's suffrage splintered over decisions to prioritize the voting rights of white middle-class women.
As an intellectual and political enterprise, feminist legal theory has been a movement embedded in the political currents of its time. The twentieth-century's struggle between liberalism and Marxism set the stage for feminist debates about prioritizing civil equality rights over material inequalities. The contemporary rollback of the welfare state, the foregrounding of the nuclear family as the caretaker of human vulnerability, and the disproportionate impact of austerity policies on marginalized women provide the context for the critical attention among feminist legal theorists to issues such as the feminization of the global care market.
It was not until the 1970s that ‘feminist legal theory’ came to be labeled as a field. The equality stage of feminist legal theory, sometimes labeled ‘liberal feminism’ and dated to the 1970s, focused on formal inequalities between women and men and called for ending legal discrimination. By the 1980s, radical or dominance feminism and difference feminism shifted attention to the differences between women and men and the social production of inequality. Both schools of thought were criticized for single-minded attention to the concerns of class- and race-privileged women.
If feminist legal theory prioritizes civil rights over material inequality, which of the following might be considered a limitation of such a perspective, according to the passage?
A. It may overlook the structural factors that contribute to gender-based economic disparities, thus failing to address the root causes of inequality.
B. It may focus too narrowly on legal reform, leaving social and cultural forms of inequality unchallenged.
C. It may disproportionately benefit people who are already economically privileged, while marginalized those who continue to experience material deprivation.
D. It may inadvertently reinforce the dominance of capitalist systems that rely on the feminization of the global care market.
E. It may assume that once legal barriers are removed, material inequalities will naturally resolve, ignoring the persistence of systemic injustices.
A. Correct Answer. The question prompt asks: If feminist legal theory prioritizes civil rights over material inequality, which of the following might be considered a limitation of such a perspective, according to the passage?
Supporting evidence from the passage:
1. "The equality stage of feminist legal theory, sometimes labeled ‘liberal feminism’ and dated to the 1970s, focused on formal inequalities between women and men and called for ending legal discrimination." This quote indicates that there was a focus on civil rights and legal reforms.
2. "By the 1980s, radical or dominance feminism and difference feminism shifted attention to the differences between women and men and the social production of inequality. Both schools of thought were criticized for single-minded attention to the concerns of class- and race-privileged women."
This quote indicates a later acknowledgment within feminist legal theory that earlier approaches might have been too narrow, focusing on legalistic aspects of inequality which do not encompass broader economic and structural disparities.
B. Incorrect. This option is too broad. The passage does not focus on social or cultural inequalities but specifically on the tension between civil rights and material inequality.
C. Incorrect. This option is close but not quite correct because yes, it touches on a relevant critique, but it shifts the focus to class-based privilege and talks about people vs. specifically women, implying an impact that is too broad and outside of the scope.
D. Incorrect. This introduces a critique of capitalism and the global care market, which, though mentioned, is not central to the issue of prioritizing civil rights over material inequality.
E. Incorrect. This option introduces an assumption not supported by the passage. The passage does not imply that feminist legal theory assumes material inequalities will naturally resolve once legal barriers are removed.
Answer: A
15 Nov 2024, 13:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
I don't agree with the explanation. The criticism was very explicitly mentioned in the passage as "single-minded attention to the concerns of class and race-privileged women". The answer should touch upon that limitation "according to the passage", as per the question, which is exactly what option C does.
