The argument states that the availability of alcohol frees people of their inhibitions and their money, linking alcohol availability to higher spending.
For this conclusion to hold, the argument assumes a causal connection between alcohol availability and spending habits, particularly regarding reduced inhibition due to alcohol.
Evaluating the options:A. Most people supported the idea of no restrictions on alcohol.
This does not connect directly to the argument's reasoning about spending habits and the availability of alcohol. Irrelevant.
B. The availability of alcohol has increased over the years.
While potentially true, this doesn't address the causal link between alcohol and increased spending, which is the core assumption.
C. People are less inhibited after the consumption of alcohol and thus tend to spend more.
This directly supports the causal link implied in the argument: alcohol consumption leads to reduced inhibition, which causes increased spending. This is the key assumption.
D. The people who saved the most when the sale of alcohol was limited were the ones who supported such limitations.
This is irrelevant to the argument about spending patterns and the availability of alcohol.
E. There are more consumer goods available since lifting the restrictions on the sale of alcohol.
While this might explain some increase in spending, it does not support the argument's claim that alcohol availability itself causes people to spend more.
Correct Answer: C