Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
09 Feb 2025, 22:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is often proposed as a geoengineering solution to combat global warming, offering the potential to temporarily reduce rising temperatures. However, concerns have emerged that SRM could unintentionally undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Critics argue that by presenting SRM as a viable option, there is a risk of creating a "moral hazard," where the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is diminished.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
What can be inferred about the author's perspective on SRM?
A. The author believes SRM will certainly shift focus away from emissions reduction.
B. The author believes SRM should not be prioritized over other climate interventions.
C. The author believes policymakers are best equipped to decide the risks of SRM.
D. The author believes SRM might prove useful in the battle against climate change.
E. The author believes SRM is ineffective in addressing climate change.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
What can be inferred about the author's perspective on SRM?
A. The author believes SRM will certainly shift focus away from emissions reduction.
B. The author believes SRM should not be prioritized over other climate interventions.
C. The author believes policymakers are best equipped to decide the risks of SRM.
D. The author believes SRM might prove useful in the battle against climate change.
E. The author believes SRM is ineffective in addressing climate change.
09 Feb 2025, 22:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is often proposed as a geoengineering solution to combat global warming, offering the potential to temporarily reduce rising temperatures. However, concerns have emerged that SRM could unintentionally undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Critics argue that by presenting SRM as a viable option, there is a risk of creating a "moral hazard," where the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is diminished.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
What can be inferred about the author's perspective on SRM?
A. The author believes SRM will certainly shift focus away from emissions reduction.
B. The author believes SRM should not be prioritized over other climate interventions.
C. The author believes policymakers are best equipped to decide the risks of SRM.
D. The author believes SRM might prove useful in the battle against climate change.
E. The author believes SRM is ineffective in addressing climate change.
A) Incorrect. This answer choice is too extreme. The passage hints that SRM could shift focus away from emissions reduction but does not definitively state that this will happen. The concern is presented as a possibility in the text, not a certainty, which makes this answer choice incorrect.
B) Incorrect. The author does not state that SRM should not be prioritized over other interventions. The argument is about balancing SRM with emissions reduction, not establishing a priority order.
C) Incorrect. The author does not imply that policymakers are the best suited to assess the risks of SRM. The passage mentions policymakers only in the context of weighing SRM's benefits and risks, but no comment about their decision capability is provided.
D) Correct Answer. This option captures the author's balanced perspective. The passage suggests SRM could be useful in addressing climate change but warns against relying on it too heavily at the expense of emissions reduction efforts.
E) Incorrect. The author does not claim that SRM is ineffective in addressing climate change. This is the opposite of what the author suggests. The author argues that SRM could be part of the solution, as long as it doesn't undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Answer: D
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is often proposed as a geoengineering solution to combat global warming, offering the potential to temporarily reduce rising temperatures. However, concerns have emerged that SRM could unintentionally undermine efforts to address the root causes of climate change. Critics argue that by presenting SRM as a viable option, there is a risk of creating a "moral hazard," where the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is diminished.
Several studies suggest that awareness of SRM may reduce public support for critical mitigation strategies, such as emission reductions, aligning with the moral hazard theory. While some research points to increased backing for policies like carbon taxes after exposure to SRM, these findings are not conclusive. The broader concern remains that SRM may foster complacency, potentially delaying the necessary actions to address climate change in a comprehensive way.
Ultimately, while SRM could serve as a part of the climate solution, its role must be carefully evaluated. If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk of reducing momentum in the fight to lower emissions—an effort widely regarded as essential for addressing the long-term impacts of climate change.
What can be inferred about the author's perspective on SRM?
A. The author believes SRM will certainly shift focus away from emissions reduction.
B. The author believes SRM should not be prioritized over other climate interventions.
C. The author believes policymakers are best equipped to decide the risks of SRM.
D. The author believes SRM might prove useful in the battle against climate change.
E. The author believes SRM is ineffective in addressing climate change.
A) Incorrect. This answer choice is too extreme. The passage hints that SRM could shift focus away from emissions reduction but does not definitively state that this will happen. The concern is presented as a possibility in the text, not a certainty, which makes this answer choice incorrect.
B) Incorrect. The author does not state that SRM should not be prioritized over other interventions. The argument is about balancing SRM with emissions reduction, not establishing a priority order.
C) Incorrect. The author does not imply that policymakers are the best suited to assess the risks of SRM. The passage mentions policymakers only in the context of weighing SRM's benefits and risks, but no comment about their decision capability is provided.
D) Correct Answer. This option captures the author's balanced perspective. The passage suggests SRM could be useful in addressing climate change but warns against relying on it too heavily at the expense of emissions reduction efforts.
E) Incorrect. The author does not claim that SRM is ineffective in addressing climate change. This is the opposite of what the author suggests. The author argues that SRM could be part of the solution, as long as it doesn't undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Answer: D
10 May 2025, 23:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
This seems too technical of a point to discard Option B.
"If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk "
This aspect of the psg which talks about over reliance essentially, means over prioritization of SRM over others could weaken progress driven by other solutions.
Balancing SRM with other climate solutions is prioritizing it the right amount.
Rejecting inference Q, options based on adjectives / synonyms which differ with psg but convey same meaning is wrong. pls correct me if otherwise.
Compare this with Option E, which is counter intuitive to the entire tone of the psg which is aimed at conveying that SRM may not end up supporting climate solutions. Only the 1st line of the last psg acknowledges, it could be a part of the solution. Hence, I had to reject it.
pls help me understand if I am approaching inference Qs the wrong way
"If overreliance on SRM shifts focus away from emissions reduction, the progress made in mitigating climate risks could be significantly weakened. Policymakers will need to weigh its potential benefits against the risk "
This aspect of the psg which talks about over reliance essentially, means over prioritization of SRM over others could weaken progress driven by other solutions.
Balancing SRM with other climate solutions is prioritizing it the right amount.
Rejecting inference Q, options based on adjectives / synonyms which differ with psg but convey same meaning is wrong. pls correct me if otherwise.
Compare this with Option E, which is counter intuitive to the entire tone of the psg which is aimed at conveying that SRM may not end up supporting climate solutions. Only the 1st line of the last psg acknowledges, it could be a part of the solution. Hence, I had to reject it.
pls help me understand if I am approaching inference Qs the wrong way
