Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
26 Feb 2025, 21:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Quantum computing, while still nascent, promises dramatic speed‐ups for problems such as large‐scale optimization, molecular simulation and cryptography. The hardware, however, is expensive, power‐hungry and must operate in ultra‐cold, shielded environments. As a result, stand‐alone quantum machines remain out of reach for most universities, laboratories and private firms that might benefit from them.
One widely discussed remedy is to place quantum processors inside secure cloud data‐centers and let users rent time on the hardware just as they rent classical virtual machines today. Cloud vendors already maintain the specialized infrastructure—cooling systems, vibration isolation and continuous calibration—that quantum chips require. Therefore, embedding quantum processors in cloud platforms will give many more organizations practical access to quantum computing and, in turn, accelerate technological innovation across industries.
The potential advantages are two-fold. First, the elastic capacity of modern clouds means a research group can spin up hundreds of quantum instances for a short period, pay only for what it uses and scale back to zero when the experiment ends. Second, pairing quantum algorithms with the massive storage and classical pre- and post-processing power available in hyperscale data-centers could sharpen applications ranging from portfolio optimization and traffic routing to drug-discovery simulations. Because access is via the internet, geography no longer limits who can experiment with cutting-edge techniques; a start-up in Nairobi can tap the same qubit pool as a Fortune 500 firm in New York.
Substantial hurdles remain. Qubits—the basic units of quantum information—are fragile, decohering in microseconds unless protected by elaborate error‐correction codes. Routing many users’ jobs through a shared quantum back‐end also demands new scheduling algorithms, latency‐tolerant protocols and secure key‐exchange mechanisms. Current research concentrates on stabilizing qubits, perfecting error‐mitigation and designing resource managers that can juggle classical and quantum workloads efficiently. Only if these engineering challenges are solved will quantum‐cloud services fulfil their promise of broad accessibility and rapid progress.
According to the passage, what aspect of cloud platforms’ scalability makes quantum cloud computing especially attractive to researchers?
A. Providing expert personnel to manage quantum hardware for client organizations
B. Allowing companies to relocate quantum processors instantly to any geographic region
C. Enabling users to launch numerous quantum instances on demand, shut them down when finished, and pay only for the capacity they use
D. Eliminating the need for error-correction in fragile qubits by isolating computations in the cloud
E. Distributing quantum computing resources evenly across competing cloud vendors
One widely discussed remedy is to place quantum processors inside secure cloud data‐centers and let users rent time on the hardware just as they rent classical virtual machines today. Cloud vendors already maintain the specialized infrastructure—cooling systems, vibration isolation and continuous calibration—that quantum chips require. Therefore, embedding quantum processors in cloud platforms will give many more organizations practical access to quantum computing and, in turn, accelerate technological innovation across industries.
The potential advantages are two-fold. First, the elastic capacity of modern clouds means a research group can spin up hundreds of quantum instances for a short period, pay only for what it uses and scale back to zero when the experiment ends. Second, pairing quantum algorithms with the massive storage and classical pre- and post-processing power available in hyperscale data-centers could sharpen applications ranging from portfolio optimization and traffic routing to drug-discovery simulations. Because access is via the internet, geography no longer limits who can experiment with cutting-edge techniques; a start-up in Nairobi can tap the same qubit pool as a Fortune 500 firm in New York.
Substantial hurdles remain. Qubits—the basic units of quantum information—are fragile, decohering in microseconds unless protected by elaborate error‐correction codes. Routing many users’ jobs through a shared quantum back‐end also demands new scheduling algorithms, latency‐tolerant protocols and secure key‐exchange mechanisms. Current research concentrates on stabilizing qubits, perfecting error‐mitigation and designing resource managers that can juggle classical and quantum workloads efficiently. Only if these engineering challenges are solved will quantum‐cloud services fulfil their promise of broad accessibility and rapid progress.
According to the passage, what aspect of cloud platforms’ scalability makes quantum cloud computing especially attractive to researchers?
A. Providing expert personnel to manage quantum hardware for client organizations
B. Allowing companies to relocate quantum processors instantly to any geographic region
C. Enabling users to launch numerous quantum instances on demand, shut them down when finished, and pay only for the capacity they use
D. Eliminating the need for error-correction in fragile qubits by isolating computations in the cloud
E. Distributing quantum computing resources evenly across competing cloud vendors
26 Feb 2025, 21:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Quantum computing, while still nascent, promises dramatic speed‐ups for problems such as large‐scale optimization, molecular simulation and cryptography. The hardware, however, is expensive, power‐hungry and must operate in ultra‐cold, shielded environments. As a result, stand‐alone quantum machines remain out of reach for most universities, laboratories and private firms that might benefit from them.
One widely discussed remedy is to place quantum processors inside secure cloud data‐centers and let users rent time on the hardware just as they rent classical virtual machines today. Cloud vendors already maintain the specialized infrastructure—cooling systems, vibration isolation and continuous calibration—that quantum chips require. Therefore, embedding quantum processors in cloud platforms will give many more organizations practical access to quantum computing and, in turn, accelerate technological innovation across industries.
The potential advantages are two-fold. First, the elastic capacity of modern clouds means a research group can spin up hundreds of quantum instances for a short period, pay only for what it uses and scale back to zero when the experiment ends. Second, pairing quantum algorithms with the massive storage and classical pre- and post-processing power available in hyperscale data-centers could sharpen applications ranging from portfolio optimization and traffic routing to drug-discovery simulations. Because access is via the internet, geography no longer limits who can experiment with cutting-edge techniques; a start-up in Nairobi can tap the same qubit pool as a Fortune 500 firm in New York.
Substantial hurdles remain. Qubits—the basic units of quantum information—are fragile, decohering in microseconds unless protected by elaborate error‐correction codes. Routing many users’ jobs through a shared quantum back‐end also demands new scheduling algorithms, latency‐tolerant protocols and secure key‐exchange mechanisms. Current research concentrates on stabilizing qubits, perfecting error‐mitigation and designing resource managers that can juggle classical and quantum workloads efficiently. Only if these engineering challenges are solved will quantum‐cloud services fulfil their promise of broad accessibility and rapid progress.
According to the passage, what aspect of cloud platforms’ scalability makes quantum cloud computing especially attractive to researchers?
A. Providing expert personnel to manage quantum hardware for client organizations
B. Allowing companies to relocate quantum processors instantly to any geographic region
C. Enabling users to launch numerous quantum instances on demand, shut them down when finished, and pay only for the capacity they use
D. Eliminating the need for error-correction in fragile qubits by isolating computations in the cloud
E. Distributing quantum computing resources evenly across competing cloud vendors
A) Incorrect. Scalability in the passage concerns elastic capacity, rapidly adding or removing quantum instances, not supplying expert personnel to manage the hardware.
B) Incorrect. The “elastic capacity” benefit does not involve relocating processors to different geographic regions; it refers to scaling the number of instances up or down on demand.
C) Correct Answer. This option accurately restates the passage’s point that researchers can “spin up hundreds of quantum instances ... pay only for what [they] use and scale back to zero,” capturing how cloud scalability aids quantum computing.
D) Incorrect. Error-correction remains a stated hurdle (paragraph 4); scalability does not remove that requirement. The passage never claims fragile qubits become self-correcting in the cloud.
E) Incorrect. While cloud access is global, the passage does not say scalability “distributes resources evenly across vendors.” The key benefit is flexible capacity for each user, not vendor-level redistribution.
Answer: C
Quantum computing, while still nascent, promises dramatic speed‐ups for problems such as large‐scale optimization, molecular simulation and cryptography. The hardware, however, is expensive, power‐hungry and must operate in ultra‐cold, shielded environments. As a result, stand‐alone quantum machines remain out of reach for most universities, laboratories and private firms that might benefit from them.
One widely discussed remedy is to place quantum processors inside secure cloud data‐centers and let users rent time on the hardware just as they rent classical virtual machines today. Cloud vendors already maintain the specialized infrastructure—cooling systems, vibration isolation and continuous calibration—that quantum chips require. Therefore, embedding quantum processors in cloud platforms will give many more organizations practical access to quantum computing and, in turn, accelerate technological innovation across industries.
The potential advantages are two-fold. First, the elastic capacity of modern clouds means a research group can spin up hundreds of quantum instances for a short period, pay only for what it uses and scale back to zero when the experiment ends. Second, pairing quantum algorithms with the massive storage and classical pre- and post-processing power available in hyperscale data-centers could sharpen applications ranging from portfolio optimization and traffic routing to drug-discovery simulations. Because access is via the internet, geography no longer limits who can experiment with cutting-edge techniques; a start-up in Nairobi can tap the same qubit pool as a Fortune 500 firm in New York.
Substantial hurdles remain. Qubits—the basic units of quantum information—are fragile, decohering in microseconds unless protected by elaborate error‐correction codes. Routing many users’ jobs through a shared quantum back‐end also demands new scheduling algorithms, latency‐tolerant protocols and secure key‐exchange mechanisms. Current research concentrates on stabilizing qubits, perfecting error‐mitigation and designing resource managers that can juggle classical and quantum workloads efficiently. Only if these engineering challenges are solved will quantum‐cloud services fulfil their promise of broad accessibility and rapid progress.
According to the passage, what aspect of cloud platforms’ scalability makes quantum cloud computing especially attractive to researchers?
A. Providing expert personnel to manage quantum hardware for client organizations
B. Allowing companies to relocate quantum processors instantly to any geographic region
C. Enabling users to launch numerous quantum instances on demand, shut them down when finished, and pay only for the capacity they use
D. Eliminating the need for error-correction in fragile qubits by isolating computations in the cloud
E. Distributing quantum computing resources evenly across competing cloud vendors
A) Incorrect. Scalability in the passage concerns elastic capacity, rapidly adding or removing quantum instances, not supplying expert personnel to manage the hardware.
B) Incorrect. The “elastic capacity” benefit does not involve relocating processors to different geographic regions; it refers to scaling the number of instances up or down on demand.
C) Correct Answer. This option accurately restates the passage’s point that researchers can “spin up hundreds of quantum instances ... pay only for what [they] use and scale back to zero,” capturing how cloud scalability aids quantum computing.
D) Incorrect. Error-correction remains a stated hurdle (paragraph 4); scalability does not remove that requirement. The passage never claims fragile qubits become self-correcting in the cloud.
E) Incorrect. While cloud access is global, the passage does not say scalability “distributes resources evenly across vendors.” The key benefit is flexible capacity for each user, not vendor-level redistribution.
Answer: C
03 Sep 2025, 19:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
I did not quite understand the solution. Hi ,
For this question , it is specifically asking about how the scalability of the cloud computing can help in quantum processors.
In the 3rd paragraph, we have been given the advantages of cloud computing for quantum processors --> "First, the elastic capacity of modern clouds means a research group can spin up hundreds of quantum instances for a short period, pay only for what it uses and scale back to zero when the experiment ends"
So according to this Option B which talks about spinning multiple instances at the same time seems more revelant to me than option C.
Let me know your thoughts
For this question , it is specifically asking about how the scalability of the cloud computing can help in quantum processors.
In the 3rd paragraph, we have been given the advantages of cloud computing for quantum processors --> "First, the elastic capacity of modern clouds means a research group can spin up hundreds of quantum instances for a short period, pay only for what it uses and scale back to zero when the experiment ends"
So according to this Option B which talks about spinning multiple instances at the same time seems more revelant to me than option C.
Let me know your thoughts
