Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 23:04 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 23:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,763
Own Kudos:
810,698
 [6]
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,763
Kudos: 810,698
 [6]
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Aboyhasnoname
Joined: 19 Jan 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
100
 [4]
Given Kudos: 64
Products:
Posts: 302
Kudos: 100
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sanjitscorps18
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Schools: IMD'26
Products:
Schools: IMD'26
Posts: 723
Kudos: 740
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Aboyhasnoname
Joined: 19 Jan 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Products:
Posts: 302
Kudos: 100
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanjitscorps18
A close one. One of the key errors in the answers can be that we don't know if the 25% talked about in the answers is the same 25% that is referred as the high calcium group in the question.


(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.
--> Milk differentiation isn't talked about in the passage hence it would be a "may or may not be" option

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.
--> This marks a clear distinction between the two groups, however small it is. A probable answer.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.
--> Since the survey is for people above 40, this may not come out as a strong reason for the difference.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.
--> This is again a "may or may not be". If the calcium percentage is high in the multivitamin and everything else assumed good, we can say this can be the reason but if the calcium percentage is very low in the multivitamin, we can't be sure if this made any difference. Still a probable answer.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
--> This isn't a variable in the stem hence cannot comment on its viability without additional data.

Among B and D, I'll side with B as it assures me of a positive difference in outcome when the same input (milk for the 200 women). While C may or may not give me the intended results. In fact, D can fail to produce results if B is true.

Bunuel
Scientific journal: Recent testing was conducted to examine the health benefits of drinking milk and what effect it has on calcium levels in women over the age of forty. The test was conducted on 200 women in similar states of health over the course of three months. The women were asked to drink two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day. All participants followed this stipulation closely. Results show that 75% of the women showed a mild increase in calcium levels, whereas 25% of the women showed a sharp improvement in calcium levels.

Which of the following, if true, most explains the inconsistency among study participants in their testing results?

(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.


——- But isn’t B changing the fact given in the argument completely... we have to explain the discrepancy from the answers.... D does that without changing any facts... It gives a clear cut additional fact that, 25% took extra calcium..
User avatar
sanjitscorps18
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
740
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Schools: IMD'26
Products:
Schools: IMD'26
Posts: 723
Kudos: 740
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not sure what fact gets changed with B. B doesn't contradict or challenge any of the premise. The question asks to explain the inconsistency. B and D both do the same. For e.g. you took more calcium, but it was expelled from your system or the calcium you took wasn't enough to cause the spike in measures calcium levels.

IMO, the options don't really have enough data to conclude either B or D. Even A can be a candidate to explain the difference but are all of these or any one irrefutable, not IMO.
Aboyhasnoname
sanjitscorps18
A close one. One of the key errors in the answers can be that we don't know if the 25% talked about in the answers is the same 25% that is referred as the high calcium group in the question.


(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.
--> Milk differentiation isn't talked about in the passage hence it would be a "may or may not be" option

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.
--> This marks a clear distinction between the two groups, however small it is. A probable answer.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.
--> Since the survey is for people above 40, this may not come out as a strong reason for the difference.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.
--> This is again a "may or may not be". If the calcium percentage is high in the multivitamin and everything else assumed good, we can say this can be the reason but if the calcium percentage is very low in the multivitamin, we can't be sure if this made any difference. Still a probable answer.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
--> This isn't a variable in the stem hence cannot comment on its viability without additional data.

Among B and D, I'll side with B as it assures me of a positive difference in outcome when the same input (milk for the 200 women). While C may or may not give me the intended results. In fact, D can fail to produce results if B is true.

Bunuel
Scientific journal: Recent testing was conducted to examine the health benefits of drinking milk and what effect it has on calcium levels in women over the age of forty. The test was conducted on 200 women in similar states of health over the course of three months. The women were asked to drink two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day. All participants followed this stipulation closely. Results show that 75% of the women showed a mild increase in calcium levels, whereas 25% of the women showed a sharp improvement in calcium levels.

Which of the following, if true, most explains the inconsistency among study participants in their testing results?

(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.


——- But isn’t B changing the fact given in the argument completely... we have to explain the discrepancy from the answers.... D does that without changing any facts... It gives a clear cut additional fact that, 25% took extra calcium..
User avatar
Aboyhasnoname
Joined: 19 Jan 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
100
 [1]
Given Kudos: 64
Products:
Posts: 302
Kudos: 100
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B says that 75% of them a certain health condition. The argument says all the women were of similar health conditions. Hence B changes the fact given in argument.


sanjitscorps18
A close one. One of the key errors in the answers can be that we don't know if the 25% talked about in the answers is the same 25% that is referred as the high calcium group in the question.


(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.
--> Milk differentiation isn't talked about in the passage hence it would be a "may or may not be" option

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.
--> This marks a clear distinction between the two groups, however small it is. A probable answer.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.
--> Since the survey is for people above 40, this may not come out as a strong reason for the difference.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.
--> This is again a "may or may not be". If the calcium percentage is high in the multivitamin and everything else assumed good, we can say this can be the reason but if the calcium percentage is very low in the multivitamin, we can't be sure if this made any difference. Still a probable answer.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
--> This isn't a variable in the stem hence cannot comment on its viability without additional data.

Among B and D, I'll side with B as it assures me of a positive difference in outcome when the same input (milk for the 200 women). While C may or may not give me the intended results. In fact, D can fail to produce results if B is true.

Bunuel
Scientific journal: Recent testing was conducted to examine the health benefits of drinking milk and what effect it has on calcium levels in women over the age of forty. The test was conducted on 200 women in similar states of health over the course of three months. The women were asked to drink two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day. All participants followed this stipulation closely. Results show that 75% of the women showed a mild increase in calcium levels, whereas 25% of the women showed a sharp improvement in calcium levels.

Which of the following, if true, most explains the inconsistency among study participants in their testing results?

(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
User avatar
Aboyhasnoname
Joined: 19 Jan 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Products:
Posts: 302
Kudos: 100
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here, let me break it down.


Bunuel
Scientific journal:

(Fact 1) Recent testing was conducted to examine the health benefits of drinking milk and what effect it has on calcium levels in women over the age of forty.

(Fact 2) The test was conducted on 200 women in similar states of health over the course of three months.

(Fact 3) The women were asked to drink two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.

All participants followed this stipulation closely.

(Paradoxical fact - PF 1) Results show that 75% of the women showed a mild increase in calcium levels,

(Paradoxical Fact - PF 2) whereas 25% of the women showed a sharp improvement in calcium levels.

Which of the following, if true, most explains the inconsistency among study participants in their testing results?

Reframing the question
What explains the discrepancy in the results given that they took same amount of milk and had similar health conditions...

(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.

(How can we say which has more calcium which has less, this answer requires assumption that whole milk has more calcium than low fat milk. Ruled out, not possible at all)

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.
(Contradicts with the fact, that all of them were in similar health condition)



(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty...
(Firstly we can’t say if age 50 absorbs less calcium, age has no bearing.. secondly what if someone was 49 from those who absorbed more and 51 from those who absorbed less calcium) .. also we don’t know if the 25% under fifty were same who absorbed more calcium... Bad answer


(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.
(Correctly explains the contradiction)

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
(Again, same as A.. requires outside assumption that those who’ve not given birth will absorb more calcium)


­
User avatar
CapedCrusader09
Joined: 07 Sep 2024
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Posts: 9
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you! This helps explain why we can eliminate option B properly. I was also puzzled.
Aboyhasnoname
B says that 75% of them a certain health condition. The argument says all the women were of similar health conditions. Hence B changes the fact given in argument.


sanjitscorps18
A close one. One of the key errors in the answers can be that we don't know if the 25% talked about in the answers is the same 25% that is referred as the high calcium group in the question.


(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.
--> Milk differentiation isn't talked about in the passage hence it would be a "may or may not be" option

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.
--> This marks a clear distinction between the two groups, however small it is. A probable answer.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.
--> Since the survey is for people above 40, this may not come out as a strong reason for the difference.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.
--> This is again a "may or may not be". If the calcium percentage is high in the multivitamin and everything else assumed good, we can say this can be the reason but if the calcium percentage is very low in the multivitamin, we can't be sure if this made any difference. Still a probable answer.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
--> This isn't a variable in the stem hence cannot comment on its viability without additional data.

Among B and D, I'll side with B as it assures me of a positive difference in outcome when the same input (milk for the 200 women). While C may or may not give me the intended results. In fact, D can fail to produce results if B is true.

Bunuel
Scientific journal: Recent testing was conducted to examine the health benefits of drinking milk and what effect it has on calcium levels in women over the age of forty. The test was conducted on 200 women in similar states of health over the course of three months. The women were asked to drink two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day. All participants followed this stipulation closely. Results show that 75% of the women showed a mild increase in calcium levels, whereas 25% of the women showed a sharp improvement in calcium levels.

Which of the following, if true, most explains the inconsistency among study participants in their testing results?

(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,763
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,763
Kudos: 810,698
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Scientific journal: Recent testing was conducted to examine the health benefits of drinking milk and what effect it has on calcium levels in women over the age of forty. The test was conducted on 200 women in similar states of health over the course of three months. The women were asked to drink two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day. All participants followed this stipulation closely. Results show that 75% of the women showed a mild increase in calcium levels, whereas 25% of the women showed a sharp improvement in calcium levels.

Which of the following, if true, most explains the inconsistency among study participants in their testing results?

(A) Twenty-five percent of the women drank whole milk each day, whereas the other 75% chose to drink low-fat milk.

(B) Seventy-five percent of the women were suffering from osteoporosis and thus did not absorb as much of the calcium from the milk.

(C) Seventy-five percent of the women were over the age of fifty, whereas the other 25% were under the age of fifty.

(D) Twenty-five percent of the women were taking a multi-vitamin with added calcium in addition to drinking two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day.

(E) Seventy-five percent of the women had given birth, while the other 25% had never had children.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



Overview:

Question recounts information about a test regarding the effects of drinking milk on calcium levels in women over the age of forty. The passage details what the participating women were asked to do, mentioning specifically that all followed the requirements closely. But the passage also notes that the test results indicated a disparity between the rise in calcium levels in some women over others. The question asks the student to choose a statement that best explains the discrepancy in results. To select the correct answer, the student must give close attention to the details in the passage and be careful not to assume details that are inconsistent with the information the passage presents.

The Correct Answer:

D The passage indicates that all of the women were required to drink the required two eight-ounce glasses of milk each day, and that all did this faithfully. There is nothing, however, to indicate that the women were not allowed to take a multi-vitamin with calcium, so answer choice (D) provides the best explanation about why some women had higher levels of calcium than others, when all were following the stipulations of the test carefully.

The Incorrect Answers:

A Although the difference between whole milk and low-fat milk might result in different calcium levels, it is impossible to deduce this from the passage; contrast this with correct answer choice (D), which specifically indicates that the vitamins some women took included calcium. Because one cannot infer from the passage that the fat content of milk affects its calcium levels, it also cannot be inferred with any certainty that the fat content of the milk contributed to the disparity in the test results Answer choice (A) is incorrect.

B The passage states quite clearly that all of the participants in the test were “in similar states of health.” Answer choice (B) contradicts this and can therefore be eliminated immediately.

C As with answer choice (A), it is possible that an age difference affected the results, but there is no indication in the passage or in the statement itself that this explains the difference in calcium levels among the women. Had answer choice (C) made the additional claim that women over the age of fifty have more difficulty in absorbing calcium, this choice might be reasonable. As it is, though, it must be eliminated.

E Answer choice (E) provides no explanation for why giving birth would affect calcium levels in women, so it cannot be correct within the context of the passage.
User avatar
iamjatinagrawal
Joined: 03 Jul 2024
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 283
Posts: 67
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) - Cannot be the answer as it doesn't specify what's the difference between calcium content in the type of milk.

(B) - This cannot be the answer as the study was conducted on women with similar health conditions but this answer choice tells that 75% of the women were suffering with "osteoporosis" which is not what the argument tells us, if the women were suffering with "osteoporosis", it should have been 100% and not just 75%.

Hence (D) is absolutely the correct answer.


Hope this helps!

sanjitscorps18
Not sure what fact gets changed with B. B doesn't contradict or challenge any of the premise. The question asks to explain the inconsistency. B and D both do the same. For e.g. you took more calcium, but it was expelled from your system or the calcium you took wasn't enough to cause the spike in measures calcium levels.

IMO, the options don't really have enough data to conclude either B or D. Even A can be a candidate to explain the difference but are all of these or any one irrefutable, not IMO.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts