Senator Wiley argues that frequent flyer programs are essentially a bribe to gain corporate clients by offering untaxed personal benefits to employees, and that this causes ticket prices for the general public to stay artificially high.
Walter Healey defends the programs by saying they benefit millions of everyday Americans who earn points not just through flights, but also through supermarkets and credit cards.
To weaken Healey’s response, we need to show that:
The major beneficiaries of frequent flyer programs are corporate travelers, not the general public, or
That the general public’s benefit is relatively minor compared to corporate usage.
(A): This slightly undercuts Healey’s point, but not significantly—it doesn’t address how many people earn points this way or how that compares to corporate travelers.
(B): This supports Wiley’s side slightly, but still doesn’t directly address how much of the benefit is tied to corporate use.
(C): Irrelevant. This is about perks on flights, not the systemic financial effect.
(D): Strongly weakens Healey. If over two-thirds of tickets are bought by companies, it strongly supports Wiley’s argument that these programs are more about serving corporate interests than the general public.
(E): Irrelevant. Government review of ticket prices doesn’t impact the issue of who benefits from frequent flyer programs.
Therefore, answer is D.