Hi!
First - a huge thanks for sharing! This process is frustrating and hard, even when it's going well! That said, you've brought up a ton of great points, and I have a few questions for you!
Quote:
Over the last three years, I’ve taken the GMAT a total of
five times – four times on the classic version and once on the Focus Edition. My most recent attempt was just last week, where I scored a
615 on the GMAT Focus Edition:
Q81 | V82 | DI 79. My highest ever official score was a
700 on the GMAT Classic, 1.5 years ago.
I'd love to see your entire score profile - but I do want to agree with another poster that a 700 on the classic, alongside being able to show that you've taken the test a few times over several years (which highlights effort, grit, and a willingness to work SO hard) is likely more than strong enough for the majority of programs out there.
Quote:
Here’s a quick overview of my recent official mock scores for context:
- 5/30/2025 – 685 (V85 | Q82 | DI85)
- 6/6/2025 – 635 (V85 | Q83 | DI76)
- 6/11/2025 – 595 (V80 | Q84 | DI75)
- 6/18/2025 – 745 (V90 | Q90 | DI81)
I also want to check in on the studying that was going on in those 3 weeks before the official exam. You did get that 745, but with two perfect 90s, it does make me wonder if you'd seen that test before (those scores are just so hard and also out of character with the other scores you were getting more consistently). Also, when we start "cranking," we run the risk of quick burnout and low test scores. You were taking weekly practice tests and presumably still studying quite a bit in between, so how much do you think exhaustion might have played a role in the real thing?
Now some notes on content, strategy, stress, and the GRE...
Quote:
Quant: My foundation is weak, and despite efforts to rebuild it, I often rely on traditional algebra-heavy methods that are time-consuming. I struggle to apply scrappy, intuitive, or shortcut-based approaches that are often essential under time pressure.
This isn't surprising, as I've been in the industry for years and no company out there is doing a great job of really helping students learn and apply better methods. I think of what is currently available,
Manhattan Prep is doing far and away the best job at this. However, they still fall short of what I believe students need to truly get good at these "algebra alternative" methods.
Quote:
Verbal & DI: On test day, I succumbed to stress. Despite daily meditation and good prep, my mind froze during the verbal section. Reading comprehension felt like reading gibberish – I couldn’t retain anything. Later, the TPA section felt overwhelming – almost like a second MSR. I think I blanked out under pressure and didn’t recover in time.
Typically we see stress and exhaustion most acutely in Verbal or DI, where there is so much information to sort through (but it likely contributed to inflexibility with solving methods on quant as well. The more stressed we are, the more we revert to habits, and so if Algebra is your habit, it's going to be hard to shake that on a stressed test day. Once again, there is where I think most test prep fails - it doesn't help you figure out what to do WHEN stress hits (cause stress / anxiety isn't an IF it's a WHEN). So learning how to re-regulate and re-center is crucial, no matter what test you inevitably choose.
Quote:
I’ve poured
years, money, and a lot of emotional energy into this test. I’ve completed almost all official materials (OGs, mocks,
GMAT Club tests, etc.) – so much so that I no longer feel mentally engaged by them. I also have work and MBA applications to juggle, and with R1 deadlines fast approaching, I feel stuck.
Do I push for another GMAT attempt – or take a break, shift to the GRE, and apply in Round 2 with that?I think this is great question to be asking - after all of this time, do I push for one more or try something different? A couple of thoughts (and an invitation to chat) - I think the GRE can be a fantastic fit for students who find timing and anxiety on the GMAT to be a big factor in the score. Being able to bounce around / skip questions and come back can help manage prioritizing strengths in ways that the GMAT structure doesn't allow. It's also true, as another poster mentioned, that the switch to the GRE isn't a full 180 - a lot of the material is the same. I'd also check to see if any of your target schools take the EA (like Columbia, Stern, Darden, Duke, UT Austin, etc). If so, a quick side-bar to take an EA might be more than enough for a competitive score for those schools. And then keep the 700 for everywhere that doesn't take the EA (as it really is a good score). If you're thinking of switching to the GRE or taking an EA, you'll want to speak to someone in admissions consulting once you have the scores to discuss which scores you should send and to who. If you send all of your different scores to a school
they are not going to choose your best for you - they are going to consider them all, and so if the GMAT would have held you back alone, it will still hold you back even if you have a better GRE next to it. You should just send the GRE if it's the most competitive score! So you'll want to chat with a consultant to help you decide once you have the numbers in hand!
And if you'd like to chat more live, you can
schedule a free consult with me!
Hope this helps!

Whit