Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
03 Oct 2025, 19:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Despite the bilateral nature of the human auditory system, many species, including humans, exhibit lateralized auditory processing. Certain birds, such as zebra finches, favor their right ear when listening for predators, while frogs often respond more to sounds entering their left ear during mating calls. In humans, this asymmetry is most evident in speech processing, which typically engages the left hemisphere. Less apparent, however, is the tendency to react more quickly to sounds entering the right ear. Studies indicate that people prefer to hold phones to their right ear, despite equal hearing capacity in both, suggesting a deeper neural basis for this phenomenon.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following statements concerning the studies by Kimura and Deutsch most accurately reflects information provided in the passage?
A. Both studies found that the hemisphere dominant for language also aids in recognizing unfamiliar musical patterns.
B. Kimura’s study linked right-ear recall to left-hemisphere language centers, while Deutsch tied right-ear melody recognition to the same hemisphere’s timing expertise.
C. Each study highlights a different aspect of auditory lateralization, with Kimura focusing on speech recall and Deutsch on musical perception.
D. Both researchers agree that non-verbal sounds are processed exclusively by the right hemisphere, regardless of environmental factors.
E. Kimura and Deutsch’s findings primarily challenge the idea that lateralization influences tasks beyond speech and melody.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following statements concerning the studies by Kimura and Deutsch most accurately reflects information provided in the passage?
A. Both studies found that the hemisphere dominant for language also aids in recognizing unfamiliar musical patterns.
B. Kimura’s study linked right-ear recall to left-hemisphere language centers, while Deutsch tied right-ear melody recognition to the same hemisphere’s timing expertise.
C. Each study highlights a different aspect of auditory lateralization, with Kimura focusing on speech recall and Deutsch on musical perception.
D. Both researchers agree that non-verbal sounds are processed exclusively by the right hemisphere, regardless of environmental factors.
E. Kimura and Deutsch’s findings primarily challenge the idea that lateralization influences tasks beyond speech and melody.
03 Oct 2025, 19:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Despite the bilateral nature of the human auditory system, many species, including humans, exhibit lateralized auditory processing. Certain birds, such as zebra finches, favor their right ear when listening for predators, while frogs often respond more to sounds entering their left ear during mating calls. In humans, this asymmetry is most evident in speech processing, which typically engages the left hemisphere. Less apparent, however, is the tendency to react more quickly to sounds entering the right ear. Studies indicate that people prefer to hold phones to their right ear, despite equal hearing capacity in both, suggesting a deeper neural basis for this phenomenon.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following statements concerning the studies by Kimura and Deutsch most accurately reflects information provided in the passage?
A. Both studies found that the hemisphere dominant for language also aids in recognizing unfamiliar musical patterns.
B. Kimura’s study linked right-ear recall to left-hemisphere language centers, while Deutsch tied right-ear melody recognition to the same hemisphere’s timing expertise.
C. Each study highlights a different aspect of auditory lateralization, with Kimura focusing on speech recall and Deutsch on musical perception.
D. Both researchers agree that non-verbal sounds are processed exclusively by the right hemisphere, regardless of environmental factors.
E. Kimura and Deutsch’s findings primarily challenge the idea that lateralization influences tasks beyond speech and melody.
A) Incorrect. Kimura’s work dealt with speech sounds (digits) and did not examine musical patterns. Therefore her study provides no evidence that the language-dominant hemisphere helps recognize unfamiliar melodies. The premise of parallel findings about music in both studies is not supported.
B) Correct. Kimura observed greater digit-recall accuracy when numbers entered the right ear and attributed this to language processing in the left hemisphere. Deutsch found that right-handed listeners identified melodic pitch changes more accurately through the right ear and linked this to the left hemisphere’s strength in handling temporal patterns needed for melody and rhythm. Thus both studies tie a right-ear advantage to specialized functions of the same (left) hemisphere, one for language, the other for timing.
C) Incorrect. It is true that Kimura focused on speech recall and Deutsch on musical perception, but this choice omits their shared conclusion about left-hemisphere involvement. Because it leaves out the key explanatory link that both authors emphasize, the statement is less accurate than option B.
D) Incorrect. Neither researcher claimed that non-verbal sounds are processed only by the right hemisphere. Deutsch actually reported a right-ear advantage for certain musical tasks, and Kimura did not address non-verbal sounds at all.
E) Incorrect. The studies do not challenge the influence of lateralization; they reinforce it. Both Kimura and Deutsch provide evidence that ear preference and hemisphere specialization affect tasks involving speech and melody rather than refuting such influence.
Answer: B
Despite the bilateral nature of the human auditory system, many species, including humans, exhibit lateralized auditory processing. Certain birds, such as zebra finches, favor their right ear when listening for predators, while frogs often respond more to sounds entering their left ear during mating calls. In humans, this asymmetry is most evident in speech processing, which typically engages the left hemisphere. Less apparent, however, is the tendency to react more quickly to sounds entering the right ear. Studies indicate that people prefer to hold phones to their right ear, despite equal hearing capacity in both, suggesting a deeper neural basis for this phenomenon.
Kimura found that individuals asked to recall digits were more accurate when the numbers were presented to their right ear. She suggested that this bias reflected the dominance of the left hemisphere in language processing. However, subsequent research by Bryden proposed that environmental factors, such as handedness, might contribute to ear preference. Despite this, later studies confirmed that the right-ear advantage persisted even when such external factors were controlled, reinforcing the role of hemispheric specialization in auditory tasks and cognitive processing.
Deutsch explored whether this lateralization extended to musical perception. In her study, participants listened to melodies through headphones and were tasked with identifying pitch variations. Right-handed participants consistently performed better when the melodies were presented to the right ear. Deutsch hypothesized that this was due to the left hemisphere’s superior processing of temporal patterns, essential for rhythm and melody recognition, particularly for complex compositions or unfamiliar pieces requiring greater auditory attention.
Not all studies align. Beck suggested that ear preferences might stem from the mechanics of the auditory pathway rather than neural dominance. His experiments exposed participants to speech and non-verbal sounds in soundproof environments. Beck found that while speech favored the right ear, non-verbal stimuli showed no significant ear preference, suggesting differences in how the brain organizes auditory inputs.
To build on this, Beck tested sound localization under varying noise conditions. His findings revealed that, in noisy environments, individuals consistently relied on their right ear regardless of sound type. This suggests that ear preference, while linked to hemispheric specialization, may also reflect situational adaptations, highlighting the complexity and variability of auditory lateralization.
Which of the following statements concerning the studies by Kimura and Deutsch most accurately reflects information provided in the passage?
A. Both studies found that the hemisphere dominant for language also aids in recognizing unfamiliar musical patterns.
B. Kimura’s study linked right-ear recall to left-hemisphere language centers, while Deutsch tied right-ear melody recognition to the same hemisphere’s timing expertise.
C. Each study highlights a different aspect of auditory lateralization, with Kimura focusing on speech recall and Deutsch on musical perception.
D. Both researchers agree that non-verbal sounds are processed exclusively by the right hemisphere, regardless of environmental factors.
E. Kimura and Deutsch’s findings primarily challenge the idea that lateralization influences tasks beyond speech and melody.
A) Incorrect. Kimura’s work dealt with speech sounds (digits) and did not examine musical patterns. Therefore her study provides no evidence that the language-dominant hemisphere helps recognize unfamiliar melodies. The premise of parallel findings about music in both studies is not supported.
B) Correct. Kimura observed greater digit-recall accuracy when numbers entered the right ear and attributed this to language processing in the left hemisphere. Deutsch found that right-handed listeners identified melodic pitch changes more accurately through the right ear and linked this to the left hemisphere’s strength in handling temporal patterns needed for melody and rhythm. Thus both studies tie a right-ear advantage to specialized functions of the same (left) hemisphere, one for language, the other for timing.
C) Incorrect. It is true that Kimura focused on speech recall and Deutsch on musical perception, but this choice omits their shared conclusion about left-hemisphere involvement. Because it leaves out the key explanatory link that both authors emphasize, the statement is less accurate than option B.
D) Incorrect. Neither researcher claimed that non-verbal sounds are processed only by the right hemisphere. Deutsch actually reported a right-ear advantage for certain musical tasks, and Kimura did not address non-verbal sounds at all.
E) Incorrect. The studies do not challenge the influence of lateralization; they reinforce it. Both Kimura and Deutsch provide evidence that ear preference and hemisphere specialization affect tasks involving speech and melody rather than refuting such influence.
Answer: B
amoeba99
Joined: 19 Feb 2025
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 31
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Schools: HBS '26 Stanford '26 Wharton '26
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V89 DI84 
GPA: 7.95
05 Oct 2025, 03:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
Timing expertise is not mentioned in the passage for research done by Deutsch. How can an option that includes that be correct?
