IMO D
All last three choices can be very tempting but we have to be very careful with the argument. We have to notice that argument mostly talks about
INTERNAL COMPETITION AMONGST TIERS OF SUBSCRIPTION. Argument ultimately assumes that if we give more access in basic, but limit a very specific constraint, people will upgrade rather than reacting in any other manner, it talks about the member being upgrading rather than of any other behaviour.
Option D states exactly that Limiting convinient time slots is a strong incentive to upgrade to be able to use new equipments.
Why i think other's are wrong?
A. OOS. Cost isn't the issue, irrelevant.
B. Weakens if anything, not what assumptions rely upon.
C. Even if some people would do this, plan would still succeed.
E. Again, tempting but out of scope.
IT TALKS ABOUT CURRENT MEMBERS (INTERNAL COMPETITION). Not whats gonna happen outside.
Bunuel
PulsePoint Gym recently upgraded the equipment in the basic-members area so that it now matches many of the features previously available only in the elite zone. This makes the basic membership far more attractive and risks reducing upgrades to elite memberships. To prevent that, PulsePoint plans to restrict basic members from using the new equipment during the most convenient time slots, even though the facility has enough capacity to allow it.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the plan depends?
(A) Elite memberships are currently too expensive for most basic members.
(B) Most basic members prefer to work out during inconvenient time slots anyway.
(C) Basic members will not respond to the restrictions by switching to another gym.
(D) Restricting access during convenient time slots will give basic members enough reason to upgrade.
(E) Other gyms in the area do not offer comparable equipment.
Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more