Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 01:59 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 01:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,340
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,340
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,340
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
paragw
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 16 Apr 2026
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 189
Kudos: 193
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,625
Own Kudos:
5,190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,625
Kudos: 5,190
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.


BF1 : reason is cited why many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient monitoring . as elderly patients unlikely use wearable devices for long period of time
BF 2 : alternate reason mentioned to mention that use of passive sensors can also be done for remote patient monitoring

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
BF 1 is not refute to argument and BF 2 is not in support to conclusion

B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
BF 1 is not key conclusion and BF 2 is not analyst conclusion as well

C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
BF 1 is not mistakenly supported to given conclusion and BF 2 is not in support to premise

D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.

this option is correct as BF 1 is mistakenly used to support conclusion and BF 2 is premise reason to support contention of the analyst correct option

E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

BF 1 is not mistakenly thought to support conclusion and BF 2 is not support to conclusion

OPTION D is correct
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
897
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 897
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BF1: Shares reasoning on why many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote PMP

BF2: Is a premise used to support HP analyst's claim, which is the main conclusion of the argument. Also HP's claim is countering what hospitals believe

D correctly reflects it

A - BF1 is not the conclusion
B - BF1 is not the conclusion
C - BF2 is not the conclusion
E - BF2 doesn't support the conclusion of hospitals

Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
sitrem
Joined: 19 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Feb 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
Posts: 91
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. incorrect. States that the first boldface is a conclusion, but its a premise FOR a conclusion.
B. incorrect. Same reason as A.
C. incorrect. The second statement is not a conclusion, but a premise.
D. correct. The analyst acknowledges the first statement but does not agree to the conclusion that hospital have come to, the second statement is also premise which is used as evidence to support the analyst's conclusion.
E. incorrect. Implies that both statements are used to support the same conclusion.
User avatar
vikramadityaa
Joined: 28 Jul 2025
Last visit: 23 Dec 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 55
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
• Hospitals argue: elderly patients won't reliably use wearables, therefore, remote monitoring won't work.
• The analyst says: This line of reasoning is a mistake. Why? Because remote monitoring does not require complicated wearables or sustained patient efforts; simple passive sensor can still be effective.

First Boldface: The conclusion of an argument that the analyst is criticizing/refuting.
Second Boldface: A premise supporting the analysts' own conclusion.

Hence, OPTION A.
User avatar
batman10bigman
Joined: 23 Apr 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Products:
Posts: 44
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Here's my take on the answer choices:

A: The first boldface is the hospitals' conclusion, which is used to justify not adopting monitoring. The second boldface is a premise the analyst gives to support the analyst's view that this hesitation is mistaken. Correct

B: The first boldface is right. The second boldface is not the analysts main conclusion, its a supporting fact (premise) that shows that remote monitoring can still work. Incorrect

C: The first boldface is not a premise in the hospitals' argument, it is their conclusion. Incorrect

D: Same issue here, the first boldface is treated as a premise, not as the hospitals' conclusion. Incorrect

E: The second boldface does not support the hospitals' original conclusion, it actually undercuts it and supports the analyst instead. Incorrect

Option A
User avatar
aka007
Joined: 15 Nov 2019
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 42
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hospital Premise. It is unlikely that elderly ...long time.
Hospital conclusion. Hospitals hesitate to adopt.... programs.

Analyst premise. Second boldface
Analyst conclusion. remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort

A. Incorrect. First is not a conclusion.
B. Incorrect. First is not conclusion.
C. Incorrect. Second is not a conclusion.
D. Correct. Both are premises.
E. Incorrect. The second boldface doesn't support the first conclusion. Rather is used to support the analysts conclusion.


Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
adityamntr
Joined: 15 Jul 2023
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 111
Kudos: 81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

1) is a mistaken reason that supoort the the conculsion that author opposes
2) shows support for author's conculsion


only D option has got both options correct!
User avatar
pappal
Joined: 24 Nov 2022
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
109
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Products:
Posts: 314
Kudos: 109
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The opening statement is X(some conclusion) because Y(first bold face), so Y cannot be a conclusion, we can strike out A & B.
Second statement "yet to argue in this way is a mistake" is followed by answer to why?--This is the main conclusion of the argument.
Strike out C since second bold face is not the conclusion.
strike out E also since the second bold face doesn't support X.
On contrary second bold face supports analyst's contention.
so D
User avatar
AviNFC
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 10 Apr 2026
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
366
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 306
Kudos: 366
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion. First is not a conclusion, but a premise. Second part is correct.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion. First is not a conclusion but a premise. Second is an evidence & not conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support. First part is nearly correct. 'thought' may not be a good choice. Second is not a conclusion and is a different premise not related to first premise,
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention. Correct. First is a premise that supports the hospitals policy. Second is a premise that supports authors conclusion.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion. First part is nearly correct. Second part supports analyst's conclusion & not the argument of the hospital.

Ans D
User avatar
flippedeclipse
Joined: 26 Apr 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Posts: 105
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

With boldface reasoning, we're trying to find a match for each boldface section. In an option choice, if one of the boldface labels is wrong, the whole answer choice is wrong. For an answer choice to be correct in verbal, the entirety of the answer choice must be correct.

Going through sentence by sentence, lets just review the argument so we understand it properly.

S1: Hospitals think that elderly patients won't use devices long-term. <-- Conclusion
S2: Analyst refutes S1.
S3: Remote devices don't need to be difficult to use, simple, easy sensors can work too. <-- Conclusion

Option A: Boldface 1 is a conclusion yes, Boldface 2 is not evidence though. Eliminate.
Option B: Boldface 1 is a conclusion, Boldface 2 is a conclusion. Both are true, hold onto this.
Option C: Boldface 1 is not a premise, eliminate.
Option D: Boldface 1 is not a premise, eliminate.
Option E: Boldface 1 is not a premise, eliminate.

Therefore B is the answer.
User avatar
Ayeka
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 528
Own Kudos:
402
 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
GPA: 4.2
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
Posts: 528
Kudos: 402
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first boldface prsents an opposing logic, the reason for hesitation is the belied that it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly. And the second boldface presents a counter evidence thatit can be effective when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

A. The first boldface is not a conclusion, it is a premise.....No
B. The first boldface is a premise and not conclusikn......No
C. The first boldface is a premsie bit the second boldface is not a conclusion, it is evidence used to support analyst claim that hospital is wrong........No
D. The first is a premsie analyst contends is mistakenly used to supprt a given conclusion, the second is a premise given to support analyst contention. .....Yes
E. The secodn boldface does not support the hospitals conclusikn......No D

D
User avatar
lkj123
Joined: 17 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Apr 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Posts: 33
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option D because both the bold faced are clearly premise
User avatar
linnet
Joined: 11 Dec 2025
Last visit: 22 Jan 2026
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 81
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is B. The first statement is a conclusion of an argument the analyst purpose to refute and the second is the analyst conclusion.
User avatar
canopyinthecity
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 91
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Analysts's View
Conclusion: Remote monitoring(RM) can be effective.
Premise: It can use simple passive sensors.

Hospital's View
Conclusion: RM may not be effective
Premise: Complicated devices and sustained patient effort makes it unlikely

(A), (B) - First is not a conclusion
(C) - Correct. First is the premise and Second is the conclusion.
(D) - First is not mistakenly used
(E) - Second is not the premise
User avatar
jkkamau
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 226
Own Kudos:
190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 142
Location: Kenya
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 226
Kudos: 190
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Reading the passage closely and keenly we can see that the first bold face is a premise that the analyst is against while the second bold phase is a premise that the analyst uses to counter the conclusion made by the hospitals.
Looking at the answer choices only choice D aligns with our observations
A&B can be eliminated swiftly because the first bold face is not conclusion. For C the second bold face is not a conclusion
Ans D
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
rahumangal
Joined: 20 Nov 2022
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 316
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
Posts: 71
Kudos: 66
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Conclusion- "Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient- monitoring programs"
BF 1- premise supporting Conc
Counter - argument/claim-" Yet to argue in this way is a mistake"
BF1- Premise supporting this counter argument
A- BF1 is not conc &s BF 2 is not supporting conclusion- OUT
B-BF 2 is not the conc- OUT
C-BF 2 is not the conc- OUT
D- correct it correctly shows the function of BF 1& 2 as explained- Correct
E-BF 2 doesn't support the conclusion- OUT
User avatar
iBN
Joined: 13 Jan 2025
Last visit: 06 Mar 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
36
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 45
Kudos: 36
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Health policy analyst: Many hospitals hesitate to adopt remote patient-monitoring programs because it is unlikely that elderly patients will consistently use wearable devices correctly for long periods of time. Yet to argue in this way is a mistake. Remote monitoring need not rely on complicated devices or sustained patient effort: it can be effective even when it involves only simple, passive sensors that require no action from patients.

In the analyst’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is a premise offered in support of the analyst’s conclusion.
B. The first is the conclusion of an argument the analyst purports to refute; the second is the analyst’s conclusion.
C. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a conclusion the analyst believes that premise does support.
D. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly used to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise given to support the analyst’s contention.
E. The first is a premise the analyst contends is mistakenly thought to support a given conclusion; the second is a premise the analyst contends better supports that conclusion.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
When reading the passage we can identify that

there is a conclusion which is supported by a premise (first boldface) which is disapproved by the analyst.
Second boldface is a premise to the analyst's conclusion. Both boldfaces are premises

passage says that General notion is remote monitoring of patients are not opted often by the hospitals as the elderly patients wont wear the trackers. Analyst is contending that there is no need to rely on complicated trackers or require high amount of effort from patient side..it can be even effective through passive sensors.

A - Wrong - First boldface is not a conclusion. Reject immediately
B - Wrong - First boldface is not a conclusion. Reject immediately
C - Wrong - Second boldface is not a conclusion. Reject Immediately
D - Correct - Only statement which aligns with our pre-thinking.
E - wrong - Second premise is not a better premise than the first premise..each premises are supporting seperate conclusions .
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts