Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
27 Mar 2026, 03:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
There is a very specific kind of humbling that happens when you are an IIT graduate and a standardized test makes you feel like you are bad at math. I went into GMAT prep fully expecting quant to be my strength and verbal to be where I would struggle. Engineering background, IIT pedigree, I thought quant should be fine. I barely gave it a second thought. That plan did not survive contact with reality.
The Reality Check
My first practice test came back at Q80. Not terrible, but for someone who expected to breeze through it, that score landed differently than I'd like to admit. Every mistake felt like a silly error. I kept telling myself I just needed to be more careful. That mindset that these were just careless slips cost me weeks.
What I eventually understood, and what the e-GMAT Quant course helped me see clearly, is that GMAT quant is not testing the same thing as engineering entrance exams. For JEE and at IIT, I felt that I there is a need to know a lot and apply the right concept at the right moment. GMAT is almost the opposite, the concept load is lighter, but the decoding work is heavier. One needs to figure out what is actually being asked before beginning to solve. I came across this idea in an MBA application forum: GMAT quant is really more of a reading test than a math test, especially for engineers. I printed that out and taped it next to my desk. It helped more than I expected.
Where I Actually Stood
When I started working through the e-GMAT portal properly, the picture became clear fast. Number Properties and Word Problems were the areas dragging me down. My hard question accuracy on Number Properties was sitting around 50% — not awful, but nowhere near what I needed. The pattern from Scholaranium was consistent: I was getting the concept right but ineffective at solving the problem. I'd calculate correctly and give the wrong answer because I'd misread what the question was actually asking.
The fix felt almost embarrassingly simple. While going through the e-GMAT course, I discovered a structured approach that I started applying to every single problem: write down what is given on one side of the scratch paper, write down what is being asked on the other, then work below that. Two columns, every time, no exceptions. The hard accuracy on Number Properties went from 50% to 85%. That improvement did not come from learning new concepts. It came from learning how to read questions differently, exactly what the e-GMAT course is designed to teach.
The Word Problem Wall
If Number Properties was a hurdle, Word Problems was a wall. I spent more time on improving my skill to solve questions in the Word Problems section than any other quant topic, more than I had planned, more than I wanted. The frustrating thing was that the root issue was not the math. I would go into a Word Problem question expecting to quickly jot down a setup and start calculating, and the question would not cooperate. They are long, layered, and if when I rushed through the reading to get to what feels like math, I ended up solving the wrong problem.
The e-GMAT Scholaranium cementing quizzes starting in relaxed time mode were where this became most visible. I would give myself plenty of time and still make mistakes. Going back through the solutions, I kept finding the same pattern: I had misidentified what was being constrained. Dhruv, my e-GMAT mentor told me the timing would sort itself out once the process was right. I did not fully believe that at first, but I stayed with it. Eventually I started treating Word Problems exactly the way the course structured them, reading like a passage, owning all the given information before touching any calculation. Questions that used to take five or six minutes dropped to three and a half, then three.
Building the Internal Clock
One thing I did not expect to struggle with was time management once I switched from relaxed to standard timing on Scholaranium. The problem was not overall pace, it was that I would get attached to a hard question and refuse to let go. Four or five minutes on a single problem, and I would only notice the damage afterwards.
What fixed this was developing an internal clock through deliberate repetition on the e-GMAT Scholaranium custom quizzes. I would pull sets of hard Number Properties questions or hard Word Problems specifically, filtered by topic and difficulty rather than mixed practice where weak areas got diluted. Running those targeted sets, the three-minute cut-off signal gradually became instinct. By my final rounds, I was hitting that mark without consciously checking the time. The skill data in Scholaranium showed me exactly where my accuracy and timing were still off at the sub-topic level, which made every session purposeful rather than generic. Dhruv played a pivotal role in the development of my internal clock.
The Ask the Expert Feature
I want to mention this because it does not get talked about enough. I have been an engineer and I have my own methods of solving math problems. Sometimes my approach was different from what the e-GMAT solution showed, and I genuinely could not tell if my method was generalizable or if I had just gotten lucky. Being able to post that question directly under the problem in the Ask the Expert section, explaining my approach and asking whether it extended to similar questions, was more useful than I had anticipated. Sometimes the answer was yes, your method works. Sometimes it was no, here is why it breaks down. Either way, I stopped carrying that uncertainty into my next attempt, which mattered a lot when I was trying to build reliable instincts.
Verbal and Data Insights
My V82 came in without heavy dedicated verbal prep, which was genuinely surprising and a positive sign I plan to build on. My DI79, however, is the honest lesson of this attempt. The e-GMAT DI course structure is well-organized, but I did not invest the time the section deserved. If you are reading this: do not repeat that mistake. DI is its own section and needs its own prep block from the start.
What I Would Tell Someone Starting Where I Started
- Don't confuse familiarity with preparation. If you have a technical background, quant will feel comfortable until it may not. If it does get uncomfortable, accepting that GMAT is testing something different helps a lot.
- The slow phase is part of the process. When I was taking six minutes on questions that I felt that I should do in three, it felt terrible. But that is where the process got internalized. Speed comes after the process is solid, not before.
- Definitely use the e-GMAT Scholaranium data. The hard question accuracy numbers definitely help. The analytics presented in the Scholaranium also contributed meaningfully in me understanding my strengths and the areas I needed improvement.
- DI needs its own prep plan. It is not a section you can pick up at the end. Start early.
Final Thoughts
The e-GMAT platform is completely self-sufficient. The course structure, the Scholaranium cementing quizzes, the custom quiz builder, the skill tracking, the Ask the Expert section — all of it works as a system, and following it consistently delivers results without needing anything external. My Q88 came from trusting that system and staying with the process even when the improvement felt invisible. The eGMAT mentors also played a huge role in my preparation and I am very thankful to Dhruv for sticking with me all along.
The curve is not linear, but it compounds. If you are somewhere in the middle of your own prep right now and it feels like the work is not paying off yet — just stay with it. Good luck out there.
Attachments
eGMAT_Metrics.png [ 143.2 KiB | Viewed 160 times ]
27 Mar 2026, 05:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
Congratulations on the 665! I wish you all the best with your applications.
27 Mar 2026, 06:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
congrats man , all the best for applications
