Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 05:21 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 05:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ametsed
Joined: 06 Sep 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AkashAvhad
Joined: 29 Oct 2019
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
22
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: United States (NJ)
Akash: Avhad
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V87 DI80
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V87 DI80
Posts: 7
Kudos: 22
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gchandana
Joined: 16 May 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 192
Own Kudos:
141
 [2]
Given Kudos: 170
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 192
Kudos: 141
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 22,278
Own Kudos:
26,529
 [1]
Given Kudos: 302
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 22,278
Kudos: 26,529
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ametsed
Hi Everyone,

I appeared for the GMAT Focus Edition on 25th March and scored a 525, which is significantly below my target of 670+. I had been preparing for about 4 months averaging around 20 hours a week and scored a 615 in my last mock before the exam, so the result was quite a shock.
The honest truth is that exam day conditions got to me. I was called in earlier than my scheduled slot, had almost no time to settle, and spent the first 15 minutes of Verbal completely unable to concentrate due to nervousness and an uncomfortable environment. By the time I found my rhythm the damage was done. Quant went reasonably well but DI had heavier non-math Two-Part Analysis than I had practiced for, which created time pressure towards the end.
Although the exam analysis painted a different picture i.e. I scored well in the non math DI based questions and the major bottleneck was the data sufficiency questions, but overall the DI section felt hard and I wasnt able to bring out the A game in that section.
Having said that, I want some guidance as to what I can do now to improve my score in the next 1.5 months. I am a working professional and planning to retake in May. I can realistically put in about 10-15 hours a week given my schedule. I would really appreciate inputs from anyone who has been in a similar situation — specifically around building a focused retake strategy, how to approach DI, and how to train for exam day composure so nerves don’t derail the first section again. Any advice from people who have bounced back from a disappointing first attempt would mean a lot.
Hi ametsed,

It takes real self-awareness to break down a disappointing result the way you did, and honestly, your diagnosis is pretty accurate. So let's use it.

A few things stand out to me from what you've described, and I want to address each one directly.

1. The 90-point gap between your mock and your official score
This is larger than typical variance, which tells me exam-day conditions (not content gaps) were the primary driver of your result. A 615 mock is real. That ability didn't disappear. What happened is that your working memory got hijacked early in Verbal, and the cognitive cost of anxiety and disorientation bled into every section that followed. This is a performance problem, not a knowledge problem. That's actually good news, because performance problems respond faster to targeted training than content gaps do.

2. Your DI situation is more nuanced than it looks
Here's what I notice: your exam analysis says you did well on non-math Two-Part Analysis and the major bottleneck was Data Sufficiency, but your experience of DI was that it felt hard and unfamiliar because of heavier non-math TPA volume than you expected. Both things can be true at once. The TPA surprise likely created time pressure that spilled into your DS questions, which then compounded into the accuracy drop the analysis captured. In other words, your DS weakness may have been partly execution under pressure, not purely a conceptual gap. Worth keeping that in mind as you diagnose how much of this is content versus conditions.

3. Your timeline is tight but workable
Six weeks at 10–15 hours per week is roughly 60–90 hours of study time. Going from 525 to 670+ is a 145-point jump — that's ambitious on this timeline, especially since the Focus Edition's 805-point scale compresses score bands at the top. It's possible, but it will require that almost every hour counts. Here's how I'd think about structuring it.

Your 6-Week Retake Framework
Weeks 1–2: Diagnosis and targeted content repair
Before you practice more, figure out exactly what broke down. Pull your official score report. It gives you section-level percentiles and sub-skill breakdowns. Focus your attention on:
  • Data Sufficiency: This is the highest-leverage fix available to you right now. DS has a very learnable logic structure. The core skill is evaluating whether a statement alone is sufficient, not solving for a value, and many students drill the wrong thing. Work through the DS question type systematically: understand the five answer choices cold, practice statement evaluation in isolation, and do sets of 10–15 DS questions untimed until your decision process is automatic. Then add time pressure.
  • Two-Part Analysis: Since you performed well here despite the volume surprise, don't over-invest. 4–6 TPA problems per day is enough to build familiarity with higher-frequency non-math formats so they don't feel foreign on test day.

Weeks 3–4: Timed mixed practice and mock simulation

Shift from topic-level drill to full-section simulation. Do timed 20-question mixed DI sets under real conditions, sitting at a desk, timer running, no pausing. Review every question you miss, but spend 3x more time on questions you got right slowly than questions you got right quickly. Timing inefficiencies often hide there.
Take one full official mock at the end of Week 3. Use GMAC's official practice exams. These are the closest to real exam conditions. Review it aggressively: every miss, every slow correct answer, every section transition. Then adjust Week 4 based on what you see.

Weeks 5–6: Exam-day simulation and composure training
This is where you train the performance layer, not just the content layer. Here's the key insight: anxiety under exam conditions is a habit, and you can train a competing habit. Specifically:
  • Do at least 3 full-length timed practice tests in the next six weeks, and treat each one like it's the real thing. Sit down at the same time of day as your actual exam slot. Don't pause. Don't check your phone. Create the conditions that made March 25th hard, and practice moving through them anyway.
  • For the first section specifically (Verbal in your case, or whatever you take first): build a 90-second pre-section routine. Before the timer starts, take three slow breaths, set an intention ("I'm going to pace myself and not catastrophize a hard question"), and remind yourself that the first few questions will feel hard — that's normal and doesn't mean anything is wrong. Practice this routine before every timed set, not just on mock days.
  • The 30-40 second rule: if a question still feels stuck after 30–40 seconds, move on. An educated guess on a question you can't crack is almost always better than spending 3 minutes getting it wrong anyway. On the GMAT Focus Edition especially, leaving questions unanswered penalizes you more than a wrong answer — always confirm a selection before moving on.
One honest note on your timeline
Getting to 675+ from a 525 in 6 weeks is at the outer edge of what's realistic, especially at 10–15 hours per week. I'd encourage you to take your Week 3 mock seriously as a decision point: if you're scoring in the 605–625 range by then, you're on track. If you're still in the high 500s, it may be worth honestly evaluating whether pushing the test by 4–6 weeks gives you a meaningfully better shot at your target. A 675 opens more doors than a 615, and taking the exam a third time carries its own cost.

That said, a lot can change in six weeks when the gap is primarily performance-based rather than content-based. You already have the foundation. The work now is building reliability under pressure.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
5,140
 [2]
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ametsed
Hi Everyone,

I appeared for the GMAT Focus Edition on 25th March and scored a 525, which is significantly below my target of 670+. I had been preparing for about 4 months averaging around 20 hours a week and scored a 615 in my last mock before the exam, so the result was quite a shock.
The honest truth is that exam day conditions got to me. I was called in earlier than my scheduled slot, had almost no time to settle, and spent the first 15 minutes of Verbal completely unable to concentrate due to nervousness and an uncomfortable environment. By the time I found my rhythm the damage was done. Quant went reasonably well but DI had heavier non-math Two-Part Analysis than I had practiced for, which created time pressure towards the end.
Although the exam analysis painted a different picture i.e. I scored well in the non math DI based questions and the major bottleneck was the data sufficiency questions, but overall the DI section felt hard and I wasnt able to bring out the A game in that section.
Having said that, I want some guidance as to what I can do now to improve my score in the next 1.5 months. I am a working professional and planning to retake in May. I can realistically put in about 10-15 hours a week given my schedule. I would really appreciate inputs from anyone who has been in a similar situation — specifically around building a focused retake strategy, how to approach DI, and how to train for exam day composure so nerves don’t derail the first section again. Any advice from people who have bounced back from a disappointing first attempt would mean a lot.
Hi ametsed,

You could consider switching your section order as well. So if verbal is not your strongest section, you could start with quant (or DI).

Also, don't forget that you can take your time to go through the terms and conditions! If you're feeling a little rushed, don't click through the initial screens quickly. Take as much time as the test allows.
User avatar
ametsed
Joined: 06 Sep 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi
Thank you for your detailed analysis and the next steps, they are really very helpful. For the next attempt, well, I dont want to go in again without scoring good 680+ in the next 3-4 mocks I give and therefore am flexible with the date I choose for the second attempt. Previously, balancing my work and preparation I had no choice but to give the exam in March. What are some tips you recommend for working professionals?

ScottTargetTestPrep

Hi ametsed,

It takes real self-awareness to break down a disappointing result the way you did, and honestly, your diagnosis is pretty accurate. So let's use it.

A few things stand out to me from what you've described, and I want to address each one directly.

1. The 90-point gap between your mock and your official score
This is larger than typical variance, which tells me exam-day conditions (not content gaps) were the primary driver of your result. A 615 mock is real. That ability didn't disappear. What happened is that your working memory got hijacked early in Verbal, and the cognitive cost of anxiety and disorientation bled into every section that followed. This is a performance problem, not a knowledge problem. That's actually good news, because performance problems respond faster to targeted training than content gaps do.

2. Your DI situation is more nuanced than it looks
Here's what I notice: your exam analysis says you did well on non-math Two-Part Analysis and the major bottleneck was Data Sufficiency, but your experience of DI was that it felt hard and unfamiliar because of heavier non-math TPA volume than you expected. Both things can be true at once. The TPA surprise likely created time pressure that spilled into your DS questions, which then compounded into the accuracy drop the analysis captured. In other words, your DS weakness may have been partly execution under pressure, not purely a conceptual gap. Worth keeping that in mind as you diagnose how much of this is content versus conditions.

3. Your timeline is tight but workable
Six weeks at 10–15 hours per week is roughly 60–90 hours of study time. Going from 525 to 670+ is a 145-point jump — that's ambitious on this timeline, especially since the Focus Edition's 805-point scale compresses score bands at the top. It's possible, but it will require that almost every hour counts. Here's how I'd think about structuring it.

Your 6-Week Retake Framework
Weeks 1–2: Diagnosis and targeted content repair
Before you practice more, figure out exactly what broke down. Pull your official score report. It gives you section-level percentiles and sub-skill breakdowns. Focus your attention on:
  • Data Sufficiency: This is the highest-leverage fix available to you right now. DS has a very learnable logic structure. The core skill is evaluating whether a statement alone is sufficient, not solving for a value, and many students drill the wrong thing. Work through the DS question type systematically: understand the five answer choices cold, practice statement evaluation in isolation, and do sets of 10–15 DS questions untimed until your decision process is automatic. Then add time pressure.
  • Two-Part Analysis: Since you performed well here despite the volume surprise, don't over-invest. 4–6 TPA problems per day is enough to build familiarity with higher-frequency non-math formats so they don't feel foreign on test day.

Weeks 3–4: Timed mixed practice and mock simulation

Shift from topic-level drill to full-section simulation. Do timed 20-question mixed DI sets under real conditions, sitting at a desk, timer running, no pausing. Review every question you miss, but spend 3x more time on questions you got right slowly than questions you got right quickly. Timing inefficiencies often hide there.
Take one full official mock at the end of Week 3. Use GMAC's official practice exams. These are the closest to real exam conditions. Review it aggressively: every miss, every slow correct answer, every section transition. Then adjust Week 4 based on what you see.

Weeks 5–6: Exam-day simulation and composure training
This is where you train the performance layer, not just the content layer. Here's the key insight: anxiety under exam conditions is a habit, and you can train a competing habit. Specifically:
  • Do at least 3 full-length timed practice tests in the next six weeks, and treat each one like it's the real thing. Sit down at the same time of day as your actual exam slot. Don't pause. Don't check your phone. Create the conditions that made March 25th hard, and practice moving through them anyway.
  • For the first section specifically (Verbal in your case, or whatever you take first): build a 90-second pre-section routine. Before the timer starts, take three slow breaths, set an intention ("I'm going to pace myself and not catastrophize a hard question"), and remind yourself that the first few questions will feel hard — that's normal and doesn't mean anything is wrong. Practice this routine before every timed set, not just on mock days.
  • The 30-40 second rule: if a question still feels stuck after 30–40 seconds, move on. An educated guess on a question you can't crack is almost always better than spending 3 minutes getting it wrong anyway. On the GMAT Focus Edition especially, leaving questions unanswered penalizes you more than a wrong answer — always confirm a selection before moving on.
One honest note on your timeline
Getting to 675+ from a 525 in 6 weeks is at the outer edge of what's realistic, especially at 10–15 hours per week. I'd encourage you to take your Week 3 mock seriously as a decision point: if you're scoring in the 605–625 range by then, you're on track. If you're still in the high 500s, it may be worth honestly evaluating whether pushing the test by 4–6 weeks gives you a meaningfully better shot at your target. A 675 opens more doors than a 615, and taking the exam a third time carries its own cost.

That said, a lot can change in six weeks when the gap is primarily performance-based rather than content-based. You already have the foundation. The work now is building reliability under pressure.
User avatar
ametsed
Joined: 06 Sep 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi
Thank you for your response and your courtesy means a lot. I would definitely keep in mind the tips you have provided for the next phase of my preparation.
gchandana
Hi ametsed,

Firstly, I am sorry your test didn't go as you expected.
Do take a few days off from prep, rewind, and come back.

Scoring lower than your mocks happens to a lot of us, so don't get discouraged from that.
Many factors come into play on test day, which include things you can control and things you can't.

Things you can control are your prep for the test, registering for the exam on the day and time you want, making sure you have all the IDs and the details match, being there at least 30 minutes before the test, resting well the previous day, and so on.
Things you can't control are system issues, test software issues, or even being called in earlier than your appointment, as you said, and many more. But fortunately, what we can still control is how we respond to these situations. Yes, they definitely disturb us, our focus, but by practicing mindfulness or meditation, one can train to retain one's calm during these situations. So give that a shot.


A few things that could help for your retake:
For prep:
1. As you mentioned, DI is definitely a beast. No doubt about that. But we can still manage it by having a strategy or process for each question type, a skipping strategy to help you decide when to guess, when to invest time, or when to bookmark it and solve it later, etc.
2. For TPA non-math, there will be verbal ones where you have to recursively check the options (as in check each option from column one with each option in column two); they are definitely time-sink ones, but you have to decide if you can find the answer with fewer checks; if not, you can always come back if time permits. And there are these puzzle-like questions, look towards making a diagram, it could be anything, maybe a table, a Venn diagram, or anything, they make a great difference in how quickly you can answer.
(Tip: If you aren't familiar with necessary and sufficient conditions, go through them, as there are some trickiest and time sink questions in TPA that use these concepts)
3. DI also relies more on our decision-making skills than just applying our concepts. Decide quickly whether you can solve that question type in a reasonable time; if not, it is not worth it. It is never worth it to spend too much time on one question. Always look towards maximizing your score by spending time wisely on questions you can solve. And deciding which questions to guess and so on.
4. Except for some questions that are time-sinks, most questions are designed to be solved in say 2-2:30 minutes for DI/GI/TA, around 8 minutes for an MSR set, and 2:30 to 3 minutes for TPA. When you keep this in mind, you will feel less anxious while approaching questions. (Say if the graph is taking time to understand, as it is tricky, the statements could be reasonably simple or vice-versa, in both cases, it could be solved in 2 minutes or so.)


For test day:
1. Being more accustomed to the test environment. You can do this by making sure you take your full-length mocks with the same section order, same time of the day as your main test(also make sure you schedule your main test at the time when you are more active and focused), and even the same day of the week could also help your mind to tune in. Make sure you don't pause the exam; treat the mocks like your real test.
2. Another part of being accustomed to the test environment is being able to handle the time pressure. For this, practice using timed sets or sectional mocks.
3. If you aren't taking the 10-minute optional break already, do consider it. It could help a lot to reset yourself from a section that might not have ended well, or even just to take a break and compose yourself back again.
4. You could do warm-up questions before going, say one question from each or whichever you like, to help you zone in on the exam.
5. Section order matters more than one can think. So it depends on you, you could start with a section you're confident with and one that will help you find your rhythm, or a section you are not so confident with, so that you can get done with it first, whichever works for you.


P.S. You can expect a score difference of +- 30 to 40 points from your mocks to the actual test. (As in you could end up scoring much higher than your mocks or maybe less, both are possible.)

This turned out to be a rather dense reply :upsidedown
But I hope this helps!

Please feel free to reach out if you have any queries.
All the best!

User avatar
ExpertsGlobal
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 18 Apr 2017
Last visit: 14 Apr 2026
Posts: 2,657
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,657
Kudos: 430
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello gchandana,

Here is a structured, step-by-step approach to help you push through:

1. Consolidate your concepts
Revisit all the conceptual material you have covered so far and work on strengthening it. If you are still struggling with certain topics, consider investing in a solid prep course. Keep in mind: while the official material is excellent for practice, it’s not designed for teaching concepts from scratch.

2. Re-attempt all previously incorrect questions
Review your mistakes from earlier practice. Understand why you got them wrong and how to avoid those errors going forward.

3. Practice with a new set of high-difficulty questions
Use either official sources or reliable third-party material to build deeper familiarity with challenging questions.

4. Practice consistently over the next few weeks
Every couple of weeks, go back and re-attempt your earlier incorrect questions. Continue revisiting weak areas in your conceptual understanding along the way.

By diligently following these four steps over a few focused weeks, you will likely find yourself performing at a significantly higher level.

All the best!

Experts’ Global Team

gchandana
Hi ametsed,

Firstly, I am sorry your test didn't go as you expected.
Do take a few days off from prep, rewind, and come back.

Scoring lower than your mocks happens to a lot of us, so don't get discouraged from that.
Many factors come into play on test day, which include things you can control and things you can't.

Things you can control are your prep for the test, registering for the exam on the day and time you want, making sure you have all the IDs and the details match, being there at least 30 minutes before the test, resting well the previous day, and so on.
Things you can't control are system issues, test software issues, or even being called in earlier than your appointment, as you said, and many more. But fortunately, what we can still control is how we respond to these situations. Yes, they definitely disturb us, our focus, but by practicing mindfulness or meditation, one can train to retain one's calm during these situations. So give that a shot.


A few things that could help for your retake:
For prep:
1. As you mentioned, DI is definitely a beast. No doubt about that. But we can still manage it by having a strategy or process for each question type, a skipping strategy to help you decide when to guess, when to invest time, or when to bookmark it and solve it later, etc.
2. For TPA non-math, there will be verbal ones where you have to recursively check the options (as in check each option from column one with each option in column two); they are definitely time-sink ones, but you have to decide if you can find the answer with fewer checks; if not, you can always come back if time permits. And there are these puzzle-like questions, look towards making a diagram, it could be anything, maybe a table, a Venn diagram, or anything, they make a great difference in how quickly you can answer.
(Tip: If you aren't familiar with necessary and sufficient conditions, go through them, as there are some trickiest and time sink questions in TPA that use these concepts)
3. DI also relies more on our decision-making skills than just applying our concepts. Decide quickly whether you can solve that question type in a reasonable time; if not, it is not worth it. It is never worth it to spend too much time on one question. Always look towards maximizing your score by spending time wisely on questions you can solve. And deciding which questions to guess and so on.
4. Except for some questions that are time-sinks, most questions are designed to be solved in say 2-2:30 minutes for DI/GI/TA, around 8 minutes for an MSR set, and 2:30 to 3 minutes for TPA. When you keep this in mind, you will feel less anxious while approaching questions. (Say if the graph is taking time to understand, as it is tricky, the statements could be reasonably simple or vice-versa, in both cases, it could be solved in 2 minutes or so.)


For test day:
1. Being more accustomed to the test environment. You can do this by making sure you take your full-length mocks with the same section order, same time of the day as your main test(also make sure you schedule your main test at the time when you are more active and focused), and even the same day of the week could also help your mind to tune in. Make sure you don't pause the exam; treat the mocks like your real test.
2. Another part of being accustomed to the test environment is being able to handle the time pressure. For this, practice using timed sets or sectional mocks.
3. If you aren't taking the 10-minute optional break already, do consider it. It could help a lot to reset yourself from a section that might not have ended well, or even just to take a break and compose yourself back again.
4. You could do warm-up questions before going, say one question from each or whichever you like, to help you zone in on the exam.
5. Section order matters more than one can think. So it depends on you, you could start with a section you're confident with and one that will help you find your rhythm, or a section you are not so confident with, so that you can get done with it first, whichever works for you.


P.S. You can expect a score difference of +- 30 to 40 points from your mocks to the actual test. (As in you could end up scoring much higher than your mocks or maybe less, both are possible.)

This turned out to be a rather dense reply :upsidedown
But I hope this helps!

Please feel free to reach out if you have any queries.
All the best!

User avatar
Edskore
Joined: 29 Dec 2022
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 273
Kudos: 128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The 90-point gap is frustrating, but honestly - you've already done the hardest part of diagnosing why it happened. That's not nothing.

Here's what jumps out to me. What you're describing isn't a content problem. A 615 mock is real. That score reflects actual ability. The exam day disaster was a performance problem, which is a different thing entirely and responds to different fixes.

On the DI piece specifically: the non-math Two-Part Analysis catching you off-guard is really common and weirdly undertalked about. Most practice resources load you up on the math-heavy TPA (systems of equations, profit optimization, etc.) but the non-math ones - logic-based, linguistic, argument structure - actually appear a lot on the real test and feel completely different. For my second push before the actual exam, I spent two focused weeks doing nothing but non-math TPA questions and MSR sets. The format stopped feeling alien.

For working professionals, the biggest thing I'd say is this: 20 hours a week is a lot, but if those hours are fragmented (30 mins here, 45 mins before dinner), the quality is lower than 3 focused 2-hour blocks. I switched to that schedule and it made a real difference. The GMAT rewards sustained focus, and you can't build that in chunks.

On the DS bottleneck from your exam analysis - try doing Data Sufficiency questions without solving them all the way. The question is always just "do I have enough to know?" not "what's the answer?" Drilling that mindset shift specifically, rather than more practice questions, is what moved my DS accuracy.

You've got the foundation. One more focused, specific attempt and 670+ is very reachable from where you are.
Moderators:
192 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
473 posts