GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 27 Jun 2019, 02:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 414
Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2014, 15:21
6
1
2
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 146 sessions

58% (02:56) correct 42% (03:01) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 139 sessions

63% (01:20) correct 37% (01:40) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 131 sessions

61% (01:14) correct 39% (01:39) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from history by the presence or absence of written documents in the societies studied. Beyond question, the absence of written documents in many primitive societies has forced the anthropologist to develop methods and techniques appropriate to the study of activities that remain “imperfectly” conscious on all the levels in which they are expressed. Apart from the fact that this limitation is often overcome by oral tradition (so rich among certain African and Oceanic peoples), it should not be regarded as a rigid barrier. Anthropology is equally concerned with cultures that employ writing, such as those of ancient Meso-America, the Arab world, and the Far East. Similarly, historians have reconstructed the history of a people like the Zulu, who have never known a written language.

Ultimately, distinctions between these fields are a matter of degree, not of kind. The anthropologist is interested in unwritten data, not because the peoples studied are incapable of writing, but because the discipline’s principal concerns differ from the information people ordinarily record on stone or paper. Historians find the concrete examples particularly illuminating regarding transition from the explicit to the implicit. Both disciplines seek an understanding of man in the theater of culture. The complementary nature of their inquiries suggests that neither will achieve that understanding without the other.

1) The primary purpose of this passage is to

A) mediate a contentious dispute between two disciplines
B) describe the underlying connections between two different academic fields
C) delineate the ways in which anthropology and history diverge
D) argue that the essential difference between history and anthropology lies in the presence or absence of written documents
E) criticize anthropologists for failing to acknowledge the contributions of historians

OA:



2) The author uses the phrase "theater of culture" in paragraph two to describe

A) the richness and complexity of oral traditions as compared to the written traditions of the west
B) the momentous historical events and epochs that anthropologists have previously ignored
C) the artistic and religious aspects of a pre-literate society that are used to piece together its history
D) the contextual beliefs and behaviors that must be studied in order to arrive at a more complete understanding of human nature
E) the necessity for social scientists to consider the spoken word as well as written documents in their study of society

OA:



3) According to the author, the presence of written data is

A) useful in addressing the confusion between anthropology and history
B) not important, because historians have described the history of cultures who have never had a written language
C) the single essential element used in determining whether a culture can be subjected to study by historians
D) functions as an important check on the techniques and methods used to assess cultures in Africa and Oceania
E) not a consideration in determining whether a society is appropriate for anthropological study

OA:


Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2014, 19:33
This passage was relatively short , however understanding answers to questions was equally difficult.
Please provide the explanations of the 3 answers.

Regards.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1479
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2014, 22:30
In this passage, the author is showing how a traditional distinction doesn't hold up. The distinction in question is that history studies societies that produce writing, while anthropology studies societies that don't. Paragraph 1 explains this distinction but then shows examples of work that doesn't follow that rule. Paragraph 2 shows how the two disciplines pursue similar goals through somewhat different means.

1) We want an answer that show that the distinction mentioned at the beginning is not really correct.
A) There's no contentious dispute (i.e. fighting) between the disciplines.
B) Yes, these two fields are connected, not sharply separated.
C) This passage is more about similarities than differences. Also, to "delineate the ways" would be to provide a clear list of the ways in which the two fields were different, rather than just to focus on one difference in approach (written vs. oral). We're told that the two disciplines have different concerns, but we're not given a clear accounting of what those concerns are.
D) This is the opposite of the author's point.
E) This just doesn't happen. There is no criticism of anthropologists, nor is there anything about acknowledging (or failing to acknowledge) the contributions of historians.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1479
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2014, 23:16
2) This is a troublesome one, as I'm not sure it's possible to predict the answer based on the text alone. It's very helpful to have some outside understanding of what the passage is getting at. For this reason, I don't think this question would make it into the real GMAT. Still, while the passage doesn't really supply additional information to support our decision, we might get the right answer by understanding that "theater" is being used metaphorically to mean "context." The idea is that the "theater of culture" is the broader context in which both disciplines are trying to understand humans. With this understanding, (D) is the only choice that works.

Note that (A) - (C) are very specific and do not clearly point to practices of both disciplines. (E) seems to be pointing to the author's main point--that there is not such a clear divide between disciplines in terms of spoken vs. written language--but the author never says that both aspects must be used by the same scientists, and in any case, this idea doesn't connect to the phrase "theater of culture."
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1479
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2014, 23:46
2
3) The author is disputing the idea that the presence of data means that a society will be studied by historians rather than anthropologists.

A) opposite
B) "Not important" is too extreme. The presence of written data can still be important--it just doesn't stop us from doing anthropology.
C) opposite and very extreme--you could probably cross this answer choice out without even reading the passage!
D) there's no support for this
E) Exactly. Anthropologists can study a society whether or not it has writing.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: A mind once opened never loses..!
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 203
Location: India
MISSION : 800
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2015, 04:30
Hey DmitryFarber

Thnx for the explanations :)

Tricky questions
_________________
Thank you

+KUDOS

> I CAN, I WILL <
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Affiliations: GMATClub
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 2529
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2018, 22:05

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions


_________________
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 749
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2018, 13:39
1
Relatively short passage but tricky questions to go with it. 3 min 25 sec and two out of three correct.

Summary & Main point: Anthropology and History are considered to be different but are not. Then a whole bunch of similarities and ways they are connected ending with examples. Ending with the bigger purpose of both is "studying the vast human culture" and neither can live without the other ( Harry Potter reference here :-P ) to end it. Great short passage.


Primary purpose - history and antrho are similar even if they seem to be different
1) The primary purpose of this passage is to

A) mediate a contentious dispute between two disciplines HOLD WRONG - there is no contentious dispute ( fight ) between the two. Here it is very important to understand the meaning of the word contentious
B) describe the underlying connections between two different academic fields Bingo - connections are shown to show the similarity between the two fields
C) delineate the ways in which anthropology and history diverge Opposite
D) argue that the essential difference between history and anthropology lies in the presence or absence of written documents Opposite - this is what the passage tries to refute
E) criticize anthropologists for failing to acknowledge the contributions of historians BS Option

Detail question
2) The author uses the phrase "theater of culture" in paragraph two to describe

A) the richness and complexity of oral traditions as compared to the written traditions of the west TRAP choice - first few words are what we are looking for but there is no compari written traditions of the west that we want to signify here
B) the momentous historical events and epochs that anthropologists have previously ignored WRONG - BS option
C) the artistic and religious aspects of a pre-literate society that are used to piece together its history Nah
D) the contextual beliefs and behaviors that must be studied in order to arrive at a more complete understanding of human nature BINGO - the theatre of culture is precisely this
E) the necessity for social scientists to consider the spoken word as well as written documents in their study of society Maybe true but unrelated to the question

Another detail question
3) According to the author, the presence of written data is

A) useful in addressing the confusion between anthropology and history BS Option - there is no confusion
B) not important, because historians have described the history of cultures who have never had a written language "NOT IMPORTANT" is too strong hence wrong
C) the single essential element used in determining whether a culture can be subjected to study by historians Precisely what the author refutes with example given of Hulu tribe
D) functions as an important check on the techniques and methods used to assess cultures in Africa and Oceania Nope
E) not a consideration in determining whether a society is appropriate for anthropological study Bingo - this is what the author mentions... both history and anthro study culture of civilizations that both use and which don't use written text

Best,
Gladi
_________________
Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Nov 2018
Posts: 74
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.88
Reviews Badge
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2018, 20:17
3/3 in 7:30min. Not a hard read but like mentioned by others, tricky questions that require good POE skills.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from   [#permalink] 29 Dec 2018, 20:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Traditionally, anthropology has been distinguished from

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne