Last visit was: 18 May 2026, 03:26 It is currently 18 May 2026, 03:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Wayxi
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York, NY
Schools:Columbia, Johnson, Tuck, Stern
Posts: 28
Kudos: 574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
whiplash2411
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 1,761
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 210
Status:Three Down.
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Posts: 1,761
Kudos: 3,602
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Wayxi
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York, NY
Schools:Columbia, Johnson, Tuck, Stern
Posts: 28
Kudos: 574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HopefulOldie
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2014
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GPA: 3.5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't by any means claim to understand the GMAT CAT Algorithm, but if I had to decipher its working, I would say it gauges your level and keeps giving you problems at that level. Remember, only in MGMAT you see questions with levels LABELED like 600 - 700 and 700 - 800. I am pretty sure GMAT CAT is more fine grained. So maybe it has levels like 600 - 620, 740 - 760, 760 - 800 etc. Also, since I have written a few fuzzy logic programs and my general understanding of the same, I think the variance in the initial questions is much larger than in the later questions. And lets throw some experimental questions in the mix making it more confusing. So honestly, I would not think of GMAT as 1- 10 on 600 level and 11 - 20 on 700 EVEN if you get every single question correct.

Another thing that I have noted about GMAT and lots of practice questions, a lot of them are not representative of the questions encountered in GMAT. So you can surely try practicing from 800Score for Quant or IIM CAT's Math for REAL 700+ level questions, but not sure that is going to help you for GMAt. I would stick with Kaplan 800 or Jeff Sackmann's Extreme Challenge.
User avatar
VeritasPrepBrian
User avatar
Veritas Prep Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Last visit: 02 Mar 2022
Posts: 416
Own Kudos:
3,274
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 416
Kudos: 3,274
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree with you, HopefulOldie - the GMAT scoring algorithm is a lot more nuanced than "600 vs. 700". They heavily research the actual difficulty level of each question so that they can firmly differentiate between a 660 and a 670 question.

Part of that research comes in the form of experimental questions, so you'll see at least a few questions that are NOT designed to test your ability level, but rather to test how someone of your difficulty level responds to that question. For that reason, please DO NOT assume that an easy question means that you're not doing well! Keep this in mind - if I want to prove that a question is a 400-level question, I need to be able to statistically demonstrate that:

1) Those scoring below 400 almost always get it wrong
2) Those scoring above 400 almost always get it right

That means that I have to show that question to several 700-level scorers to ensure that it is, indeed, a question that people scoring well above 400 will overwhelmingly answer correctly - otherwise it's not a valid question. So you will see some experimental questions (you won't know which they are, of course) and that will impact the difficulties that you see.


Now, in terms of practicing the top-shelf questions, you're right that there's a lack of those in circulation, which if you think about it is because:

1) There are more 400-600 level questions necessary for this test than there are 700-800 and 200-300 questions. On a normal, bell-shaped distribution, more examinees fall toward the middle of the range than the outskirts, so they have to write more questions to service that middle ground.

2) 700+ level questions are hard to write responsibly - you need questions that someone scoring a very-excellent 690 will usually miss, but that someone scoring 750 will frequently get right. And it can't be for arbitrary reasons...it needs to show, legitimately, that a 750 examinee is a better problem solver than a 690 examinee. That's really tough to do, and so it doesn't make a ton of sense for the GMAT to retire those questions and put them in general circulation as quickly - if you have that question available, you have to use it!

I'd argue that the best way to study for the 700+ questions is to take the hard questions that you do see and ask yourself: How can they make this harder? How can they change the question slightly to elicit the other answer?

To become an elite test-taker, you really have to be able to think like the test-makers, and learn to spot those devices that they use to make the questions tougher. Yes, there's a lack of really good hard questions out there, but you can create more of them by asking yourself follow-up questions to the harder questions that you do see (what if they flipped the inequality? What if "less than" became "less than or equal to"? What if they asked for x instead of y? What if it said nonnegative and not positive?) so that you're aware of all the subtleties that the truly hard questions on the GMAT will contain.
Moderators:
201 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts