Last visit was: 18 May 2026, 12:04 It is currently 18 May 2026, 12:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
aceman626
Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
Posts: 469
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jylo
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Last visit: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Posts: 23
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
johnnyx9
Joined: 28 Jun 2006
Last visit: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 958
Own Kudos:
Posts: 958
Kudos: 100
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kidderek
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 13 Jul 2019
Posts: 1,959
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,959
Kudos: 372
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
They are bad as simulators of the GMAT, but good for practice. If you feel high and mighty, take an MGMAT exam and you will be humbled.
User avatar
VirtualM
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Last visit: 03 Dec 2009
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just finished taking an MGMAT CAT. I had previously done several GMAT paper tests and scored well (670 - 730 range), but this test, especially the quant part, left me feeling like an idiot. In fact, I got frustrated and quit in my previous try. The Reading Comprehension questions are also highly technical and loooooong. I managed to get a 690 (Q 42, V 41), but I still think that this test is not indicative of what the actual GMAT will look and feel like. The questions are unrealistically difficult - in the actual GMAT you can expect to face a couple of these types of questions, but not as many as these, and not in succeeding order! :shock:

I think the MGMAT CAT is good for honing content and pacing skills, but is probably not an accurate predictor of test day, in terms of the entire test's content as well as the score that you'll be getting. Maybe on my next try, I'll increase the time limit (MGMAT gives you the option) since the questions are more challenging than the standard GMAT questions anyway.
User avatar
lepium
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Last visit: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 1,359
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,359
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aceman626
Is anybody else puzzled by Manhattan CATs? I scored a 740 (43 Q, 51 V) on my first MGMAT CAT, but I am definitely not happy. Why? Well because I got 20 questions wrong on my quant! And 5 out of the first 10 wrong! And I still got a 43, which is quite surprising. In the real GMAT or GMAT Prep, I am sure that getting this many wrong will get you no more than a 35 on quant.

Also, on verbal, I got 9 or 10 wrong! How is it possible that I get a 51? On the real GMAT or GMATPrep that would get you no higher than a 42-43 probably.

So in conclusion I have 2 issues with Manhattan CATs:

1) The quant is extremely hard, much harder than GMATPrep. I am lucky to even get 17 problems right, I think a lot of them were lucky guesses. I think I honestly knew how to do no more than 13 or 14 of the quant problems. Is it even worthwhile to do something that much harder than the real one? Will it help or would it just be a waste of time?

2) With the extermely generous scoring, is it even close to being an accurate prediction of what you will get in the real test? I need more practice CATs, and I heard good stuff about Manhattan so I bought it. But it's hard to imagine that the scores would be accurate! I have already done GMATPrep several times (scoring 630-670) so I need more pratice elsewhere. Any ideas?


I have no experience with Manhattan. However, remember that GMAT scores are not about % of right and wrong answers. They are about the difficulty of correct answers. For eg: if you answer questions 1 - 10 correctly, and then you answer 2 out of 3 questions right thereafter, you are constantly faced with difficult questions and could get a great score with several wrong answers.

On GMATprep (which scores similarly to GMAT), I scored 40 Q and 48Q with exactly the same quantity of wrong answers (about 15). The main difference was the distribution of those wrong answers.

Cheers. L.
User avatar
sm176811
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Last visit: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 1,038
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,038
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMAT Prep generates the closest scorfes to the real test and is a good way to predict the scores. Use the others for practice but do not be bogged down by the scores!
User avatar
OasisNYK
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Last visit: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 449
Own Kudos:
Products:
Posts: 449
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just took MGMAT exam 1 and got a 640 Q:37 V:39

I have to say I think it in no way represents the real thing. The quant was almost impossible and the verbal was reasonable.

I think its probably designed like the Kaplans, to make the test seem impossible and then when you take the real thing you get a much better score.

I wish they would release an update to the GMAT Prep question bank so we could get more CATs out of that. 2 is really rediculous, even if you reset them it loses its credibility to predict your score.
User avatar
ricokevin
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Last visit: 09 Jan 2009
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Posts: 193
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yep. It puzzled me the first time I took one of the six online CATs.
The quant section...It just destroyed my confidence to the last bit and I started to panick. Later, tho I realized how un-real-test-like the MGMAT CAT was and that made me feel much better.

I think I got something like 37 for Quant :shock: and 51 for verbal (and yes with around 10 questions wrong!)

I think they're definately NOT good predictors of your real score. But the math problems are challenging and they should help you prepare for medium to difficult problems....

I have never taken the real thing yet, but just for the comparison:

PowerPrep 1 - Q 49 V 41 740
PowerPrep 2 - Q 49 V 44 760
GMATPrep 1 - Q 50 V 44 770 :-D

PowerPreps I think are too easy (the math) to use for preparation...

Good luck!
Moderators:
201 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts