Hi! So a quick run down of my stats: 28 years old, 0.7 years work experience as financial analyst, worked as restaurant server then bartender then manager for 8 or so years until I graduated. Right out of high school went to a state school for computer science, got a 1.54 gpa. 5 years later went back to a smaller state school and got a 4.0 gpa, 27 straight A's, graduated with an Econ degree. GPA from both schools together is 2.79.
I make around $50k.
My goals are to become at least a finance manager in a Corp FP&A dept for something like $80 to $120K salary, beyond that maybe a VP or even CFO. If I go the MBA route it looks like I have two choices:
1.) Get a low ranked part time MBA. I could go to where I graduated for near free and wouldn't have to take the GMAT since I graduated with a 4.0. This option would allow me greater chance to get finance manage/senior financial analyst jobs that say "MBA preferred". Technically I could get these jobs without an MBA but it would be easier. I would continue working while in school so very low opp cost.
2.) Spend 180 hours and take the GMAT with the goal of getting into a T25 B school full time, preferably UNC. I would spend a lot of time on the application as well, making sure my story, EC, and essay are aligned and solid. Would need a 700+ GMAT score. Goal here would be to take on $100k debt but make $110k right out school with a much faster career projection. I realize the likelihood of getting in is not great.
At this time I'm not considering a T30-T60 school, because I don't think it is a better option than option 1.
So would you spend the time to take the GMAT if you were me? I'm really struggling with this, I want to do option 1 but 180 hours is no joke if my chance is only 5%.
Thanks!!