Last visit was: 18 May 2026, 03:23 It is currently 18 May 2026, 03:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sudhir18n
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Last visit: 13 Feb 2013
Posts: 351
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 351
Kudos: 618
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rubashov1
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Last visit: 29 Sep 2016
Posts: 864
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Schools:Kellogg '10
Posts: 864
Kudos: 107
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhaypratapsingh
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Last visit: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Posts: 107
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sudhir18n
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Last visit: 13 Feb 2013
Posts: 351
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 351
Kudos: 618
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am based out of India and an R2 applicant to H/S/W... there is no way I can imagine coming back to India post MBA and earn in Rupees to Pay loan in Dollars ,its umimagineable. I dont mind working in S'pore, HK, London where I believe the brand of HSW is very very good, work permit is relatively easy and the pay is same if not more than that of US. But this move by US government will deinitely every intl student think twice before joining an MBA no matter if its top 3 or top 5.
User avatar
leonidas
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Last visit: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
Posts: 215
Kudos: 369
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO and from what I have see from the past, the government can bring as many rules as it wants, the companies will always find a loop-hole or circumvent the issue. I think that, there will be a minimal impact wrt to H1B Visa restrictions.
User avatar
refurb
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Last visit: 30 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Schools:Tuck
Posts: 1,321
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Honestly, those "new" restrictions are pretty much in line with the rules right now.

From what I've read, finance firms don't tend to sponsor a ton of H1-Bs anyways.

RF
User avatar
mba07
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Last visit: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
Schools:Ross, Kellogg, Darden (i/v)
Posts: 219
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
refurb

Honestly, those "new" restrictions are pretty much in line with the rules right now.

From what I've read, finance firms don't tend to sponsor a ton of H1-Bs anyways.

RF

I agree to your first point. It is not very different from what is already in place.
In the good days, finance/IB along with consulting used to be the biggest H1B sponsor at business schools.
User avatar
refurb
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Last visit: 30 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Schools:Tuck
Posts: 1,321
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mba07
refurb

Honestly, those "new" restrictions are pretty much in line with the rules right now.

From what I've read, finance firms don't tend to sponsor a ton of H1-Bs anyways.

RF

I agree to your first point. It is not very different from what is already in place.
In the good days, finance/IB along with consulting used to be the biggest H1B sponsor at business schools.

Hmmm! Did not know that!

I've always heard that it's pretty difficult to get H1B sponsorship for most positions coming out of an MBA program, so I just assumed that was across the board.

RF
User avatar
spiridon
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Last visit: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 274
Kudos: 127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Things are definitely not good for H1B. Microsoft, who was a bigest proposal and supporter of H1B visa expansion (prolly because of cheaper labor...) is now laying off more then 5000 ppl. They wont be able to make a case anymore alltogether with financial companies.

Decreasing h1B will decrease global competitiveness of these companies but everyone is now looking for a scapegoat to blame for high unemployment among the US workforce

I think Bush placed a big cap on number of H1B visas that can be issued annualy, so this is a reflection of those kind of policies
User avatar
abhaypratapsingh
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Last visit: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Posts: 107
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just cannot put the numbers to justify an MBA in US in current situation ... I have drop the idea of applying any US MBA and will stick to europe and Singapore.

thnks
User avatar
3underscore
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 1,428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Finance (Corp Fin, Financial Instruments)
Schools:NYU Stern 2009
Posts: 1,428
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is a pool of H1B for MBA grads, it doesn't get fully subscribed until about 1 month of being available (compare to immediate for non-grad study).

Banks will still sponsor for H1B. I know that from direct experience, as do a bunch of my friends graduating this year. I don't know where these rumours start - I know consultants are going through the same process. The only thing that seems to be open to debate is the situation of being in H1B when you start, so not having the full time period.

The conditions seem fine - why not employ equally qualified domestic candidates at the same price? It also effectively says "employ overseas candidates where they are better".

For the person upthread, I strongly recommend you look into European visas. The UK definitely tightened the policy last year. Singapore still remains by far and away the easier option.
User avatar
riverripper
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Last visit: 20 Aug 2022
Posts: 4,306
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Back in Chicago, IL
Concentration: General/Operations Management
Schools:Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 4,306
Kudos: 806
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am far from a protectionist, and definitely support bringing the best and the brightest to the US to keep our position in the global economy. Personally, if you are going to come here for an advance degree and get paid the same thing as another grad no matter what your country of origin then thats fine.

However, many companies use the H1B to bring in people when they claim they can't find people who are qualified. As someone who is an engineer, is married to an engineer, and has tons of friends who are engineers this is not really a very accurate picture of what companies do. They say OK we need an electrical engineer and we will pay 50k...oh we can't find anyone to take the position. Surprising? I think not when you are paying far below market value. Well we can easily find some one overseas who fits this job requirement and they will be willing to work for 35% below what an American with a few years experience and still holding 50k worth of student loans will want. I am don't hold it against people from overseas taking the jobs, but most companies can't honestly say they can't find people to fill those positions with qualified people from here.

Personally, I think we should be more in-line with the UK system which awards points based on things like salary, where you got your degree, what degree it is. Make it simple to bring in people who are either going to be better than the talent that is available or fill a job function we cant fill from within the US easily. I think people who come here for degrees should have an added advantage. Yes Insead is a great school but someone who spent 2 years and 150k getting a degree from a top 10 school in the US should have priorities. I feel bad for some of my classmates who want the same career path as I do but there are far fewer doors open for them. Its silly in my opinion to bring them here, teach them at the best schools, and then show them the door and let them bring all that talent someplace else.

If you want to attract and keep the best and the brightest, just create a point system that ensures you are awarding a visa to the electrical engineering Phd from MIT here instead of giving it to just some recent bachelor grad from whatever unknown school in whatever country. No offense but how many MIT phd's in EE are there compared to how many of the other people? Find the best schools overseas and award them high points too; MBA's from Insead, engineers from IIT...but still say priorty should go to the MBA from Wharton and the Cal Tech engineer.
User avatar
spiridon
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Last visit: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 274
Kudos: 127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
riverripper,

That is an interesting idea but a lot of talented students cannot afford to go to the top schools and a lot of talent would be lost. Also, the pressure on high ranked schools would be enourmous and thats not fair towards 90% of other schools either.

When you say that 50k is below the market value - It is in the US. But in today's global economy companies are competing world-wide. They develope strategies and programs and compete with each other for 6 billion ppl marketshare. If US companies cannot access cheaper labor that would increase their costs and they will lose some of their competiveness, especially in a long run.

Labor is just another cost as is material. Should manufacturers be forced to pay a certain price of raw materials such as wood, steel or whatever?

It is understandable that some forces want to protect US labor but shouldnt the market value supposed to be observed globally, so if there is such a big source of engineers ready to work for 50k then why not? Why pay double that amount?

That is exactly what happened with US based car makers, they were spoiled for years, protected, and over time become uncompetitive on the global market.

Protective measures are good in the short run but they cripple the economy in the long run.

H1B workers are forced to pay social security but they never get to use it and dont get their money back. The company also have to do a lot of paperwork and to prove there are no Americans available at the moment, ofcourse there are many loop-holes to this but... its not as easy to hire one.

US Companies should be set free to have easy access to cheapest material and labor available or they will be outperformed by the competition.

After all, if company cannot decrease labor costs within the US, they will completely outsource their factories and everything overseas, perhaps register it under different name or whatever so thats even bigger lost
User avatar
refurb
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Last visit: 30 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Schools:Tuck
Posts: 1,321
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
riverripper

They say OK we need an electrical engineer and we will pay 50k...oh we can't find anyone to take the position. Surprising? I think not when you are paying far below market value.

The H1B visa requires that the sponsor completes a labor condition application (LCA) and pays at least the prevailing wage (which is determine by the Department of Labor).

Every H1B that I've seen at our company is paid the exact same any a US employee and it is far above the "prevailing wage".

However, the system is open for abuse. If a company wants to hire someone on an H1B, they will often create a position with a very specific role description that only the foreign worker can fill. There may be US citizens who could do the job, but because they don't fit the job description perfectly, they are passed over.

RF
User avatar
highhopes
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Last visit: 26 Mar 2022
Posts: 643
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Schools:Duke 2012
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 643
Kudos: 138
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Whether or not you feel it's fair or smart, protectionism in the US is only going to get worse in the coming months. Geithner's accusing China of currency manipulation last month is only going to start the dam flowing. That combined with all the job loss, we are going to be hearing tons about how there's an uneven playing field. The government is going to be stuck in a tough spot, because people are going to be very angry once unemployment checks stop paying out and they will demand this kind of thing.
avatar
fall09
Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Last visit: 03 Dec 2009
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
Posts: 251
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree with some of the points mentioned above.There is certainly a lot of abuse of the H1B system,especially by outsourcing firms.Add to that the innumerable number of boutique(desi) consulting companies. There should be some sort of merit system.

On the topic of wages,I keep hearing that H1Bs are paid less,but that is not the case atleast from what I saw.The LCA specifies the minimum prevailing wage in that region and companies will pay that to abide by the DOL rules.
User avatar
Toubab
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Last visit: 07 Oct 2014
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Schools:Fuqua
Posts: 117
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is primarily a CYA move on the part of the Senate. When things start to get worse (before they get better), they want to show that they've tried to help out the American worker. Incidentally, the vast majority of the job losses over the last few months have been focused in manufacturing and low-end service-sector jobs (those highly publicized losses at Microsoft et. al. notwithstanding), not in the kinds of fields that MBA-holders generally end up in. Finance is an obvious exception to that.

I too support expanding the H-1B visa program, but in a more strategic way. For example, if we really wanted to screw the government of Iran, a smart thing to do would be to offer H1-B visas to any highly-skilled Iranian engineer who wanted to come over.

In other cases, I think we should remember that recruiting all of the "best and brightest" of the rest of the world to come work in the U.S. generally contributes to the brain drain phenomenon that deprives many developing nations of the human capital they need to build their own economies.
User avatar
Audio
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Last visit: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Booth, Stern
Posts: 408
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rca215
Any restrictions on the employment of highly skilled workers in the US is, in my opinion, irresponsible and contrary to one of the key factors that has made this country an epicenter for commerce and innovation.

I second that opinion 200%.
User avatar
bostonsparky
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Last visit: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Management Consulting, Social Enterprise, Environmental Sustainability, International Business
Schools:Fuqua '11
Posts: 348
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Jerz
Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Last visit: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 1,221
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Health Enterprise Management, Marketing, Strategy, Finance, Analytical Consulting, Economics
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 770 Q49 V47
Posts: 1,221
Kudos: 254
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's not just us Yanks who are feeding the protectionist beast. Our neighbors to the north look to be getting in on it:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... m_mostview
 1   2